1 |
Belvedere P. Posterior composites experiencing growth trend Dentistry Today 1999: 18(3) :44.46-47
|
2 |
Alster D. FeiIzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Mol A, Davidson CL. The dependence of shrinkage stress reduction on porosity concentration in thin resin layers. J Dent Res 1992: 71: 1619-1621
DOI
PUBMED
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Qvist V. Resin resorations: Leakage. bacteria, pulp. Endod Dent TraumatIo 1993:9: 127-152
DOI
|
4 |
Lutz E, Krejci I. Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margin of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 1986:17: 777-784
|
5 |
A. Kugel G, Hurley E. Class II composite resin restorations using glass-ionomer liners: microleakage studies. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1996:21: 67-70
|
6 |
Belli S, Inokoshi S, Ozer F, Pereira PN, Ogata M, Tagami J. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of class II adhesive composite restoration. Oper Dent 2001 :26(1) :70-75
|
7 |
Ashraf M. Estafan. Denise Estafan. Microleakage study of fl owa ble composite resin systems. Compendium 2000: vol.21. No.9:705-712
|
8 |
R. Labella. P. Lambrechts. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 15(1999)128-137
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Kanca J. Suh BI. Pulse activation: Reducing resinbased composite contraction stresses at the enamel cavosurface margins. Am J Dent 1999: 12: 107-112
PUBMED
|
10 |
C Beznos. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 2001 :26:60-69
|
11 |
Chuang SF, Liu JK, Chao ce, Liao FP, Chen YH. Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite resorations. J Prosthet Dent 2001: 85(2): 177-183
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Leevailoj c. Cochran MA, Matis BA. Moore BK, Platt JA. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners. Oper Dent 2001 :26(3) :302-307
|
13 |
Kemp-Scholte CM. Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990:69(6): 1240-1243
DOI
PUBMED
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Davidson CL. de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 1984:63(2): 146-148
|
15 |
Feilzer A. de Gee A. Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoratives. J Dent Res 1987:66: 1636-1639
DOI
PUBMED
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Peutzfeldt A. Resin composites in dentistry: The monomer systems. Eur J Oral Sci 1997:105:92-116
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Phillips RW, Avery DR, Mehra R, Swartx ML & Mccune RJ. Observations on a composite resin for Class II restorations: Three-year report. J of Prosthet Dent 1973:30(6) :891-897
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Van Meerbeek B. Willems G. Celis JP. Roos JH. Braem M. Lambrechts P. Banherle G. Assessment by nanoindentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resindentin bonding area. J Dent Res 1993:72:1434-1442
DOI
PUBMED
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Tjan AH. Bergh BH. Lindner C. Effect of various incremental techniques on the marginal adaptation of class II composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1992 :67 :62-66
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Leeson TS: Atlas of Histology 1 ed. Philadelphia: Saunders. 401.1988
|
21 |
Versluis A. Tantbirojn D. Douglas WH. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res 1998: 77:1435-1445
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Leinfelder KF. Radz GM & Nash RW. A report on a new condensable composite resin. Compendium 1998: 19(3):230-237
|
23 |
Crim GA, Champman KW. Reducing microleakage in class II restorations: an in vitro study. Quintessence Int 1994:25:781-785
|
24 |
Kays BT, Sneed WD. Muckles DB. lvIicrohardness of class II composite resin restorations with different matrices and light positions. J Prosth Dent 1991: 65(4) :487-490
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Bonner PB. New developments in composite resins. Dentistry Today 1997: 16(4) :44-47
PUBMED
|
26 |
John H. Payne IV. The marginal seal of class II resoration: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer. J of Clin Pediat Dent 1999: voI.23, No.2: 123-130
|
27 |
Bayne se, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr. Stamatiades P. Wilkersin M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998: 129:567-577
DOI
|
28 |
Fusayama T. Indications for self-cured and light cured adhesive composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1992: 67:46-51
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Ehrnflrd L. Derand T. Cervical gap formation in class II composite resin restoration. Swed Dent J 1984:8:15-19
PUBMED
|