Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.1.012

ANTICARIOGENCI EFFECT OF COMPOMER AND RMGIC  

Park, Sung-Ho (Department of Consercative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.27, no.1, 2002 , pp. 12-15 More about this Journal
Abstract
The first purpose of present study was to compare the anticariogenic effect of compomer, resin modified glass ionomer cement and composite (RMGIC). The second purpose was to evaluate the recently introduced methods, which use confocal scanning micro-scope, in detecting initial caries around restoration. 2$\times$4$\times$1.5mm cavities were prepared from the recently extracted 50 human teeth on the buccal or lingual surface. The prepared teeth were randomly devided into 5 groups and restored with each filling material. Group 1: Dyract AP, Group 2: compoglass F, Group 3: F2000, Group 4: Z100. Group 5:Fuji II LC. The teeth were stored for 30 days in the distilled water, then stored in the buffer solution for artificial caries development: pH 4.3, lactic acid 100 mM, calcium 16 mM, phosphate 8mM, sodium azide 3mM. Then, the samples were sectioned longitudinally and examined with confical scanning microscope. The results showed that the use of compomer and resin modified glass ionomer cement showed caries inhibition zone whereas the composite did not. There was no difference in the width of caries inhibition zone between compomers and RMGIC. The confocal scanning microscope was useful in detecting initial caries around restoration.
Keywords
Compomer; RMGIC; Fluoride; Anticariogenic effect;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Momoi Y. Kida K. Ikejima I. Yamamoto S, Murakami T, Kohno A. Compomer as a competitor to resin composite restorations. Modern trends in adhesive dentis try: Proceedings of the adhesive dentistry forum 99 in Tsurumi. Yokohama. Japan. 1st edition. Osaka, Japan. Kuraray Co. Ltd. 2-19
2 Qvist V. Lauberg L. Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Resin modified glass ionomers and compomer restorations in primary teeth. Three-year results (abstract) J Dent Res (Spec Iss) 77:637.1998
3 Folwaczny M. Mehl A. Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 57ear results Am J Dent 14 153-156,2001   PUBMED
4 Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Papadogiannis Y, Konstantinidis A. Artificial secondary caries around two new Frcontalning restoratives, Oper Dent 23 81-86,1998   PUBMED
5 Fontana M, Li Y, Dunipace AJ, Noblitt TW, Fischer GM, Katz BP, Stookey GK. Measurement of enamel demineralization using microradiography and confocal microscopy. Caries Res 30 317-325, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Gonzalez-Cabezas C, Fontana M, Stookey GK, Detection of Mutans Streptococci in secondary carious lesions using immunofluorescent technique and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Caries Res 29 198-203   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Millar BJ, Abiden F, Nicholson JW. In vitro caries inhibition by polyacid-modified composite resins. J Dent 26 133-136, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Park SH, Kim KY. The anticariogenic effect of fluoride in primer, bonding agent, and composite resin in the cavosurface enamel area. Oper Dent 22 115-120, 1997   PUBMED
9 차승우, 윤태철, 박성호, 이찬영, 금기연. 공초점 레이저 주사 현미경을 이용한 법랑질 초기 우식 재광화의 정량적 분석. 대한치과보존학회지 26 1-8, 2001
10 Folwaczny M. Loher C, Mehl A. Benz C, Hickel R. Class-V fillings with four different light curing materials: three year results (abstract) J Dent Res (Spec Iss) 77: 190
11 Forsten L. Paunio IK. Fluoride release by silicate cements and composite resins. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 80 515-519.1972
12 박성호, 이찬영, 이정석. 유산완충용액을 이용한 인공치아우식의 형성에 미치는 산의 농도와 pH 에 관한 연구. 대한치과보존학회지 18 277-290, 1993
13 Wilson AD. Groffmann DM & Kuhn AT. The release of fluoride and other chemical species from a glass ionomer cement. Biomater 6431-433.1985
14 Rawls HR & Zimmerman BF. Fluoride-exchanging resins for caries prevention. Caries Research 17 32-43.1983   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Forsten L. Fluoride release from a fluoride containing amalgam and luting cements. Journal of Dental Research 84 348-350.1976