Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.5.294

Does the palatal vault form have an influence on the scan time and accuracy of intraoral scans of completely edentulous arches? An in-vitro study  

Osman, Reham (Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University)
Alharbi, Nawal (Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.14, no.5, 2022 , pp. 294-304 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of different palatal vault configurations on the accuracy and scan speed of intraoral scans (IO) of completely edentulous arches. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three different virtual models of a completely edentulous maxillary arch with different palatal vault heights- Cl I moderate (U-shaped), Cl II deep (steep) and Cl III shallow (flat)-were digitally designed using CAD software (Meshmixer; Autodesk, USA) and 3D-printed using SLA-based 3D-printer (XFAB; DWS, Italy) (n = 30; 10 specimens per group). Each model was scanned using intraoral scanner (Trios 3; 3ShapeTM, Denmark). Scanning time was recorded for all samples. Scanning accuracy (trueness and precision) were evaluated using digital subtraction technique using Geomagic Control X v2020 (Geomagic; 3DSystems, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to detect differences in scanning time, trueness and precision among the test groups. Statistical significance was set at α = .05. RESULTS. The scan process could not be completed for Class II group and manufacturer's recommended technique had to be modified. ANOVA revealed no statistically significant difference in trueness and precision values among the test groups (P=.959 and P=.658, respectively). Deep palatal vault (Cl II) showed significantly longer scan time compared to Cl I and III. CONCLUSION. The selection of scan protocol in complex cases such as deep palatal vault is of utmost importance. The modified, adopted longer path scan protocol of deep vault cases resulted in increased scan time when compared to the other two groups.
Keywords
Dimensional measurement accuracy; Palatal vault height; Scan strategy; Scan;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Zarone F, Ruggiero G, Ferrari M, Mangano F, Joda T, Sorrentino R. Comparison of different intraoral scanning techniques on the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:762.e1-8.
2 Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, Kilpela A, Makynen A. Recent advances in dental optics - Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Opt Laser Eng 2014;54:203-21.   DOI
3 Sun L, Lee JS, Choo HH, Hwang HS, Lee KM. Reproducibility of an intraoral scanner: A comparison between in-vivo and ex-vivo scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;154:305-310.   DOI
4 Mangano A, Beretta M, Luongo G, Mangano C, Mangano F. Conventional vs digital impressions: acceptability, treatment comfort and stress among young orthodontic patients. Open Dent J 2018;12:118-24.   DOI
5 Joda T, Lenherr P, Dedem P, Kovaltschuk I, Bragger U, Zitzmann NU. Time efficiency, difficulty, and operator's preference comparing digital and conventional implant impressions: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:1318-23.   DOI
6 AlRumaih HS. Clinical applications of intraoral scanning in removable prosthodontics: a literature review. J Prosthodont 2021;30:747-62.   DOI
7 Patzelt SB, Vonau S, Stampf S, Att W. Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws. J Am Dent Assoc 2013;144:914-20.   DOI
8 Zhongpeng Y, Tianmin X, Ruoping J. Deviations in palatal region between indirect and direct digital models: an in vivo study. BMC Oral Health 2019;19:66.   DOI
9 Schimmel M, Akino N, Srinivasan M, Wittneben JG, Yilmaz B, Abou-Ayash S. Accuracy of intraoral scanning in completely and partially edentulous maxillary and mandibular jaws: an in vitro analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2021;25:1839-47.   DOI
10 Rasaie V, Abduo J, Hashemi S. Accuracy of intraoral scanners for recording the denture bearing areas: a systematic review. J Prosthodont 2021;30:520-39.   DOI
11 Deferm JT, Schreurs R, Baan F, Bruggink R, Merkx MAW, Xi T, Berge SJ, Maal TJJ. Validation of 3D documentation of palatal soft tissue shape, color, and irregularity with intraoral scanning. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:1303-9.   DOI
12 Pan S, Guo D, Zhou Y, Jung RE, Hammerle CHF, Muhlemann S. Time efficiency and quality of outcomes in a model-free digital workflow using digital impression immediately after implant placement: A double-blind self-controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019;30:617-26.   DOI
13 Bohner L, Gamba DD, Hanisch M, Marcio BS, Tortamano Neto P, Lagana DC, Sesma N. Accuracy of digital technologies for the scanning of facial, skeletal, and intraoral tissues: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:246-51.   DOI
14 Tapie L, Lebon N, Mawussi B, Fron-Chabouis H, Duret F, Attal JP. Understanding dental CAD/CAM for restorations--accuracy from a mechanical engineering viewpoint. Int J Comput Dent 2015;18:343-67.
15 Mennito AS, Evans ZP, Nash J, Bocklet C, Lauer Kelly A, Bacro T, Cayouette M, Ludlow M, Renne WG. Evaluation of the trueness and precision of complete arch digital impressions on a human maxilla using seven different intraoral digital impression systems and a laboratory scanner. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019;31:369-77.   DOI
16 Revilla-Leon M, Subramanian SG, Ozcan M, Krishnamurthy VR. Clinical study of the influence of ambient light scanning conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of an intraoral scanner. J Prosthodont 2020;29:107-13.   DOI
17 Gan N, Xiong Y, Jiao T. Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions for whole upper jaws, including full dentitions and palatal soft tissues. PLoS One 2016;11:e0158800.   DOI
18 Kim SJ, Donovan DM, Blanchard SB, Kowolik JE, Eckert GJ. The relationship between acute otitis media and the anatomic form of the hard palate. Pediatr Dent 2008;30:9-14.
19 ISO 5725-1. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results-Part 1: general principles and definitions. International Standard Organization (ISO); Geneva; Switzerland, 1994.
20 Sallorenzo A, Gomez-Polo M. Comparative study of the accuracy of an implant intraoral scanner and that of a conventional intraoral scanner for complete-arch fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2021;S0022-3913(21)00083-4. [Online ahead of print]
21 Quaas S, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations. J Dent 2007;35:903-8.   DOI
22 Keul C, Guth JF. Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24:735-45.   DOI