Rating criteria to evaluate student performance in digital wax-up training using multi-purpose software |
Mino, Takuya
(Department of Oral Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences)
Kurosaki, Yoko (Department of Oral Rehabilitation and Implantology, Okayama University Hospital) Tokumoto, Kana (Department of Oral Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences) Higuchi, Takaharu (Department of Oral Rehabilitation and Implantology, Okayama University Hospital) Nakanoda, Shinichi (Insidefield Corporation) Numoto, Ken (Department of Oral Rehabilitation and Implantology, Okayama University Hospital) Tosa, Ikue (Department of Oral Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences) Kimura-Ono, Aya (Department of Oral Rehabilitation and Implantology, Okayama University Hospital) Maekawa, Kenji (Department of Oral Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences) Kim, Tae Hyung (Removable Prosthodontics, Division of Restorative Sciences, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry of University of Southern California) Kuboki, Takuo (Department of Oral Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences) |
1 | Iacopino AM. The influence of "new science" on dental education: current concepts, trends, and models for the future. J Dent Educ 2007;71:450-62. DOI |
2 | Fasbinder DJ. Computerized technology for restorative dentistry. Am J Dent 2013;26:115-20. |
3 | Callan RS, Blalock JS, Cooper JR, Coleman JF, Looney SW. Reliability of CAD CAM technology in assessing crown preparations in a preclinical dental school environment. J Dent Educ 2014;78:40-50. DOI |
4 | Schwindling FS, Deisenhofer UK, Porsche M, Rammelsberg P, Kappel S, Stober T. Establishing CAD/CAM in preclinical dental education: evaluation of a handson module. J Dent Educ 2015;79:1215-21. DOI |
5 | Afshari FS, Sukotjo C, Alfaro MF, McCombs J, Campbell SD, Knoernschild KL, Yuan JC. Integration of digi- tal dentistry into a predoctoral implant program: program description, rationale, and utilization trends. J Dent Educ 2017;81:986-94. DOI |
6 | de Azevedo Rde A, da Rosa WL, da Silva AF, Correa MB, Torriani MA, Lund RG. Comparative effectiveness of dental anatomy carving pedagogy: a systematic review. J Dent Educ 2015;79:914-21. DOI |
7 | Reifeis PE, Kirkup ML, Willis LH, Browning WD. Introducing CAD/CAM into a predoctoral dental curricu- lum: a case study. J Dent Educ 2014;78:1432-41. DOI |
8 | Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009;28:44-56. DOI |
9 | Douglas RD, Hopp CD, Augustin MA. Dental students' preferences and performance in crown design: conventional wax-added versus CAD. J Dent Educ 2014; 78:1663-72. DOI |
10 | Haj-Ali R, Feil P. Rater reliability: short- and long-term effects of calibration training. J Dent Educ 2006;70: 428-33. DOI |
11 | Satterthwaite JD, Grey NJ. Peer-group assessment of pre-clinical operative skills in restorative dentistry and comparison with experienced assessors. Eur J Dent Educ 2008;12:99-102. DOI |
12 | Renne WG, McGill ST, Mennito AS, Wolf BJ, Marlow NM, Shaftman S, Holmes JR. E4D compare software: an alternative to faculty grading in dental education. J Dent Educ 2013;77:168-75. DOI |
13 | Gratton DG, Kwon SR, Blanchette D, Aquilino SA. Impact of digital tooth preparation evaluation technology on preclinical dental students' technical and self-evaluation skills. J Dent Educ 2016;80:91-9. DOI |
14 | Hamil LM, Mennito AS, Renne WG, Vuthiganon J. Dental students' opinions of preparation assessment with E4D compare software versus traditional methods. J Dent Educ 2014;78:1424-31. DOI |
15 | Gratton DG, Kwon SR, Blanchette DR, Aquilino SA. Performance of two different digital evaluation systems used for assessing pre-clinical dental students' prosthodontic technical skills. Eur J Dent Educ 2017;21: 252-60. DOI |
16 | Cardoso JA, Barbosa C, Fernandes S, Silva CL, Pinho A. Reducing subjectivity in the evaluation of pre-clinical dental preparations for fixed prosthodontics using the Kavo PrepAssistant. Eur J Dent Educ 2006;10:149-56. DOI |
17 | Sharaf AA, AbdelAziz AM, El Meligy OA. Intra- and inter-examiner variability in evaluating preclinical pe- diatric dentistry operative procedures. J Dent Educ 2007;71:540-4. DOI |
18 | Licari FW, Knight GW, Guenzel PJ. Designing evaluation forms to facilitate student learning. J Dent Educ 2008;72:48-58. DOI |
19 | Kwon SR, Restrepo-Kennedy N, Dawson DV, Hernandez M, Denehy G, Blanchette D, Gratton DG, Aquilino SA, Armstrong SR. Dental anatomy grading: comparison between conventional visual and a novel digital assessment technique. J Dent Educ 2014;78:1655-62. DOI |
20 | Kunkel TC, Engelmeier RL, Shah NH. A comparison of crown preparation grading via PrepCheck versus grading by dental school instructors. Int J Comput Dent 2018;21:305-311. |
21 | Garrett PH, Faraone KL, Patzelt SB, Keaser ML. Comparison of dental students' self-directed, faculty, and software-based assessments of dental anatomy waxups: a retrospective study. J Dent Educ 2015;79:1437-44. DOI |
22 | Kurosaki Y, Mino T, Maekawa K, Izumi K, Kuboki T. Digital transfer of the subgingival contour and emergence profile of the provisional restoration to the final bone-anchored fixed restoration. J Prosthodont Res 2019;63:125-9. DOI |
23 | Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33: 159-74. DOI |
![]() |