Wear of 3D printed and CAD/CAM milled interim resin materials after chewing simulation |
Myagmar, Gerelmaa
(Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Lee, Jae-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) Ahn, Jin-Soo (Department of Dental Biomaterials Science and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) Yeo, In-Sung Luke (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) Yoon, Hyung-In (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) Han, Jung-Suk (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) |
1 | Tasin S, Ismatullaev A, Usumez A. Comparison of surface roughness and color stainability of 3-dimensionally printed interim prosthodontic material with conventionally fabricated and CAD-CAM milled materials. J Prosthet Dent 2021:S0022-3913(21)00075-5. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.027. Epub ahead of print. DOI |
2 | Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997;13:258-69. DOI |
3 | Revilla-Leon M, Morillo JA, Att W, Ozcan M. Chemical composition, Knoop hardness, surface roughness, and adhesion aspects of additively manufactured dental interim materials. J Prosthodont 2020 Dec 8. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13302. Epub ahead of print. DOI |
4 | Shim JS, Kim JE, Jeong SH, Choi YJ, Ryu JJ. Printing accuracy, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, and microbial adhesion of 3D-printed resins with various printing orientations. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 124:468-75. DOI |
5 | Rosentritt M, Behr M, van der Zel JM, Feilzer AJ. Approach for valuating the influence of laboratory simulation. Dent Mater 2009;25:348-52. DOI |
6 | Hahnel S, Behr M, Handel G, Rosentritt M. Two-body wear of artificial acrylic and composite resin teeth in relation to antagonist material. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 101:269-78. DOI |
7 | Johansson A, Haraldson T, Omar R, Kiliaridis S, Carlsson GE. An investigation of some factors associated with occlusal tooth wear in a selected high-wear sample. Scand J Dent Res 1993;101:407-15. |
8 | Johansson A, Kiliaridis S, Haraldson T, Omar R, Carlsson GE. Covariation of some factors associated with occlusal tooth wear in a selected high-wear sample. Scand J Dent Res 1993;101:398-406. |
9 | Kim SK, Kim KN, Chang IT, Heo SJ. A study of the effects of chewing patterns on occlusal wear. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:1048-55. DOI |
10 | Kadokawa A, Suzuki S, Tanaka T. Wear evaluation of porcelain opposing gold, composite resin, and enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:258-65. DOI |
11 | Zafar MS. Prosthodontic applications of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA): an update. Polymers (Basel) 2020;12:2299. DOI |
12 | Mair LH, Stolarski TA, Vowles RW, Lloyd CH. Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop. J Dent 1996;24:141-8. DOI |
13 | Oh WS, Delong R, Anusavice KJ. Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:451-9. DOI |
14 | Alevizakos V, Mitov G, Teichert F, von See C. The color stability and wear resistance of provisional implant restorations: a prospective clinical study. Clin Exp Dent Res 2020;6:568-75. DOI |
15 | Pham DM, Gonzalez MD, Ontiveros JC, Kasper FK, Frey GN, Belles DM. Wear resistance of 3D printed and prefabricated denture teeth opposing zirconia. J Prosthodont 2021 Jan 24. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13339. Epub ahead of print. DOI |
16 | Drago C. Frequency and type of prosthetic complications associated with interim, immediately loaded full-arch prostheses: a 2-year retrospective chart review. J Prosthodont 2016;25:433-9. DOI |
17 | Drago C. Cantilever lengths and anterior-posterior spreads of interim, acrylic resin, full-arch screw-retained prostheses and their relationship to prosthetic complications. J Prosthodont 2017;26:502-7. DOI |
18 | Patras M, Naka O, Doukoudakis S, Pissiotis A. Management of provisional restorations' deficiencies: a literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2012;24:26-38. DOI |
19 | Perry RD, Magnuson B. Provisional materials: key components of interim fixed restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2012;33:59-60, 62. |
20 | Priest G. Esthetic potential of single-implant provisional restorations: selection criteria of available alternatives. J Esthet Restor Dent 2006;18:326-38; discussion 339. DOI |
21 | Savabi O, NejatiDanesh F. A method for fabrication of temporary restoration on solid abutment of ITI implants. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:419. DOI |
22 | Rosentritt M, Behr M, Gebhard R, Handel G. Influence of stress simulation parameters on the fracture strength of all-ceramic fixed-partial dentures. Dent Mater 2006;22:176-82. DOI |
23 | Buergers R, Rosentritt M, Handel G. Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to provisional fixed prosthodontic material. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:461-9. DOI |
24 | Simoneti DM, Pereira-Cenci T, Dos Santos MBF. Comparison of material properties and biofilm formation in interim single crowns obtained by 3D printing and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 2020:S0022-3913(20)30513-8. |
25 | Tahayeri A, Morgan M, Fugolin AP, Bompolaki D, Athirasala A, Pfeifer CS, Ferracane JL, Bertassoni LE. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dent Mater 2018; 34:192-200. DOI |
26 | Javaid M, Haleem A. Current status and applications of additive manufacturing in dentistry: a literature-based review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2019;9: 179-85. DOI |
27 | Jung YG, Peterson IM, Kim DK, Lawn BR. Lifetime-limiting strength degradation from contact fatigue in dental ceramics. J Dent Res 2000;79:722-31. DOI |
28 | Stawarczyk B, Ozcan M, Trottmann A, Schmutz F, Roos M, Hammerle C. Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:325-32. DOI |
29 | Jones CS, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations. Br Dent J 2004; 196:42-5; discussion 31. DOI |
30 | Park JM, Ahn JS, Cha HS, Lee JH. Wear resistance of 3D printing resin material opposing zirconia and metal antagonists. Materials (Basel) 2018;11:1043. DOI |
31 | Unkovskiy A, Bui PH, Schille C, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Huettig F, Spintzyk S. Objects build orientation, positioning, and curing influence dimensional accuracy and flexural properties of stereolithographically printed resin. Dent Mater 2018 ;34:e324-33. |
32 | DeLong R, Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, Pintado MR. The wear of dental amalgam in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dent Mater 1985;1:238-42. DOI |
33 | Abduo J, Lyons K, Bennamoun M. Trends in computer-aided manufacturing in prosthodontics: a review of the available streams. Int J Dent 2014;2014:783948. DOI |
34 | Park JY, Jeong ID, Lee JJ, Bae SY, Kim JH, Kim WC. In vitro assessment of the marginal and internal fits of interim implant restorations fabricated with different methods. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:536-42. DOI |
35 | Burns DR, Beck DA, Nelson SK. Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional fixed prosthodontic treatment: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:474-97. DOI |
36 | Preis V, Behr M, Kolbeck C, Hahnel S, Handel G, Rosentritt M. Wear performance of substructure ceramics and veneering porcelains. Dent Mater 2011;27:796-804. DOI |
37 | Krejci I, Albert P, Lutz F. The influence of antagonist standardization on wear. J Dent Res 1999;78:713-9. DOI |
38 | Rayyan MM, Aboushelib M, Sayed NM, Ibrahim A, Jimbo R. Comparison of interim restorations fabricated by CAD/CAM with those fabricated manually. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:414-9. DOI |