Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.3.127

Correlation between microhardness and wear resistance of dental alloys against monolithic zirconia  

Cha, Min-Sang (Department of Dentistry, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
Lee, Sang-Woon (Department of Dentistry, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
Huh, Yoon-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Cho, Lee-Ra (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Park, Chan-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.13, no.3, 2021 , pp. 127-135 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose. The aim of this study is to compare the hardness according to the conditions of metal alloys. Moreover, the correlation between the cast crown hardness before and after wear testing and the degree of wear for each dental alloy was assessed. Materials and Methods. Cast crowns of three metal alloys (Co-Cr, gold, and Ni-Cr alloys) opposing smooth-surface monolithic zirconia were used. The Vickers microhardness of the ingot (which did not undergo wear testing) and the cast crown before and after wear testing were measured for each alloy. Two-way ANOVA and Scheffé tests were used to compare the measured hardness values. Moreover, the Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between the surface hardness and the wear of the cast crown (α=.05). Results. There was no significant difference in the hardness before and after wear testing for the gold alloy (P>.05); however, the hardness of the worn surface of the cast crown increased compared to that of the cast crown before the wear tests of Ni-Cr and Co-Cr alloys (P<.05). Furthermore, there was no correlation between the wear and hardness of the cast crown before and after wear testing for all three metal alloys (P>.05). Conclusion. There was a significant difference in hardness between dental alloys under the same conditions. No correlation existed between the surface hardness of the cast crown before and after wear testing and the wear of the cast crown.
Keywords
Dental alloys; Hardness; Wear; Zirconia;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Triwatana P, Nagaviroj N, Tulapornchai C. Clinical performance and failures of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures: a review literature. J Adv Prosthodont 2012; 4:76-83.   DOI
2 Vermilyea SG, Cai Z, Brantley WA, Mitchell JC. Metallurgical structure and microhardness of four new palladium-based alloys. J Prosthodont 1996;5:288-94.   DOI
3 Bomicke W, Rammelsberg P, Stober T, Schmitter M. Short-term prospective clinical evaluation of monolithic and partially veneered zirconia single crowns. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017;29:22-30.   DOI
4 Hmaidouch R, Weigl P. Tooth wear against ceramic crowns in posterior region: a systematic literature review. Int J Oral Sci 2013;5:183-90.   DOI
5 Saiki O, Koizumi H, Nogawa H, Hiraba H, Akazawa N, Matsumura H. Influence of ceramic surface texture on the wear of gold alloy and heat-pressed ceramics. Dent Mater J 2014;33:865-73.   DOI
6 Jung YS, Lee JW, Choi YJ, Ahn JS, Shin SW, Huh JB. A study on the in-vitro wear of the natural tooth structure by opposing zirconia or dental porcelain. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2:111-5.   DOI
7 Cha MS, Lee SW, Huh YH, Cho LR, Park CJ. Metal stain on monolithic zirconia restoration: a case report. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:138-42.   DOI
8 Faria AC, Rodrigues RC, Claro AP, da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos M, Ribeiro RF. Wear resistance of experimental titanium alloys for dental applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2011;4:1873-9.   DOI
9 Hsu HC, Kikuchi H, Yen SK, Nishiyama M. Evaluation of different bonded investments for dental titanium casting. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007;18:605-9.
10 Oilo M, Nesse H, Lundberg OJ, Gjerdet NR. Mechanical properties of cobalt-chromium 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by casting, milling, and additive manufacturing. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:156.e1-7.
11 Guess PC, Schultheis S, Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Ferencz JL, Silva NR. All-ceramic systems: laboratory and clinical performance. Dent Clin North Am 2011;55:333-52, ix.   DOI
12 Jacobi R, Shillingburg HT Jr, Duncanson MG Jr. A comparison of the abrasiveness of six ceramic surfaces and gold. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:303-9.   DOI
13 Turner KA, Missirlian DM. Restoration of the extremely worn dentition. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:467-74.   DOI
14 Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Forjanic M, Zellweger G, Rousson V. Wear of ceramic and antagonist-a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro. Dent Mater 2008;24:433-49.   DOI
15 Albashaireh ZS, Ghazal M, Kern M. Two-body wear of different ceramic materials opposed to zirconia ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104:105-13.   DOI
16 Kanbara T, Sekine H, Homma S, Yajima Y, Yoshinari M. Wear behavior between zirconia and titanium as an antagonist on fixed dental prostheses. Biomed Mater 2014;9:025005.   DOI
17 Burgess JO, Janyavula S, Lawson NC, Lucas TJ, Cakir D. Enamel wear opposing polished and aged zirconia. Oper Dent 2014;39:189-94.   DOI
18 Luangruangrong P, Cook NB, Sabrah AH, Hara AT, Bottino MC. Influence of full-contour zirconia surface roughness on wear of glass-ceramics. J Prosthodont 2014;23:198-205.   DOI
19 Chan KS, Koike M, Okabe T. Modeling wear of cast Ti alloys. Acta Biomater 2007;3:383-9.   DOI
20 Cha MS, Huh YH, Cho LR, Park CJ. A comparative study of the wear of dental alloys against monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:866-73.   DOI
21 American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM E384-17. Standard test method for microindentation hardness of materials. Available at: https://www.astm.org/Standards/E384
22 Chen WC, Teng FY, Hung CC. Characterization of Ni-Cr alloys using different casting techniques and molds. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2014;35:231-8.   DOI
23 Tamirisakandala S, Bhat RB, Tiley JS, Miracle DB. Grain refinement of cast titanium alloys via trace boron addition. Scripta Mater 2005;53:1421-6.   DOI
24 Bezzon OL, de Barros C, de Almeida Rollo JM, Di Lorenzo PL. Pilot study of the relationship between the hardness and abrasion resistance of two base metal alloys used for metal-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:190-4.   DOI
25 Amer R, Kurklu D, Kateeb E, Seghi RR. Three-body wear potential of dental yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramic after grinding, polishing, and glazing treatments. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1151-5.   DOI
26 Wataha JC. Alloys for prosthodontic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:351-63.   DOI
27 Nogues L, Martinez-Gomis J, Molina C, Peraire M, Salsench J, Sevilla P, Gil FJ. Dental casting alloys behaviour during power toothbrushing with toothpastes with various abrasivities. Part I: wear behavior. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008;19:3041-8.   DOI
28 Preis V, Behr M, Handel G, Schneider-Feyrer S, Hahnel S, Rosentritt M. Wear performance of dental ceramics after grinding and polishing treatments. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2012;10:13-22.   DOI
29 Wassell RW, Walls AW, Steele JG. Crowns and extra-coronal restorations: materials selection. Br Dent J 2002;192:199-202, 205-11.   DOI
30 Stockl C, Hampe R, Stawarczyk B, Haerst M, Roos M. Macro- and microtopographical examination and quantification of CAD-CAM composite resin 2- and 3-body wear. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:537-45.   DOI