Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.6.329

Biomechanical behavior of CAD/CAM cobalt-chromium and zirconia full-arch fixed prostheses  

Barbin, Thais (Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas)
Silva, Leticia Del Rio (Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas)
Veloso, Daniele Valente (Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas)
Borges, Guilherme Almeida (Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas)
Presotto, Anna Gabriella Camacho (Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas)
Barao, Valentim Adelino Ricardo (Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas)
Groppo, Francisco Carlos (Department of Physiological Sciences, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas)
Mesquita, Marcelo Ferraz (Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.12, no.6, 2020 , pp. 329-337 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. To verify the influence of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) implant-supported prostheses manufactured with cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) and zirconia (Zr), and whether ceramic application, spark erosion, and simulation of masticatory cycles modify biomechanical parameters (marginal fit, screw-loosening torque, and strain) on the implant-supported system. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Ten full-arch fixed frameworks were manufactured by a CAD/CAM milling system with Co-Cr and Zr (n=5/group). The marginal fit between the abutment and frameworks was measured as stated by single-screw test. Screw-loosening torque evaluated screw stability, and strain analysis was explored on the implant-supported system. All analyses were performed at 3 distinct times: after framework manufacturing; after ceramic application in both materials' frameworks; and after the spark erosion in Co-Cr frameworks. Afterward, stability analysis was re-evaluated after 106 mechanical cycles (2 Hz/150-N) for both materials. Statistical analyses were performed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (α=.05). RESULTS. No difference between the two materials was found for marginal fit, screwloosening torque, and strain after framework manufacturing (P>.05). Ceramic application did not affect the variables (P>.05). Spark erosion optimized marginal fit and strain medians for Co-Cr frameworks (P<.05). Screw-loosening torque was significantly reduced by masticatory simulation (P<.05) regardless of the framework materials. CONCLUSION. Co-Cr and Zr frameworks presented similar biomechanical behavior. Ceramic application had no effect on the biomechanical behavior of either material. Spark erosion was an effective technique to improve Co-Cr biomechanical behavior on the implant-supported system. Screw-loosening torque was reduced for both materials after masticatory simulation.
Keywords
Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM); Dental marginal adaptation; Dental stress analysis; Implant-supported dental prostheses; Spark erosion;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Rojas Vizcaya F. Retrospective 2- to 7-year follow-up study of 20 double full-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed prostheses: measurements and recommendations for optimal design. J Prosthodont 2018;27:501-8.   DOI
2 Jokstad A, Shokati B. New 3D technologies applied to assess the long-term clinical effects of misfit of the full jaw fixed prosthesis on dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26:1129-34.   DOI
3 de Torres EM, Rodrigues RC, de Mattos Mda G, Ribeiro RF. The effect of commercially pure titanium and alternative dental alloys on the marginal fit of one-piece cast implant frameworks. J Dent 2007;35:800-5.   DOI
4 Ciocca L, Meneghello R, Savio G, Scheda L, Monaco C, Gatto MR, Micarelli C, Baldissara P. Manufacturing of metal frameworks for full-arch dental restoration on implants: A comparison between milling and a novel hybrid technology. J Prosthodont 2019;28:556-63.   DOI
5 Abduo J, Lyons K. Effect of vertical misfit on strain within screw-retained implant titanium and zirconia frameworks. J Prosthodont Res 2012;56:102-9.   DOI
6 Burguete RL, Johns RB, King T, Patterson EA. Tightening characteristics for screwed joints in osseointegrated dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:592-9.   DOI
7 Papaspyridakos P, Bordin TB, Natto ZS, Kim YJ, El-Rafie K, Tsigarida A, Chochlidakis K, Weber HP. Double full-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses: Outcomes and complications after a mean follow-up of 5 years. J Prosthodont 2019; 28:387-97.   DOI
8 Presotto AGC, Oliveira LV, Pisani MX, Barao VAR, Mesquita MF. Influence of spark erosion on the fit of screw-retained Co-Cr fixed complete denture frameworks veneered with different materials. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:797-803.   DOI
9 Abduo J. Fit of CAD/CAM implant frameworks: a comprehensive review. J Oral Implantol 2014;40:758-66.   DOI
10 de França DG, Morais MH, das Neves FD, Carreiro AF, Barbosa GA. Precision fit of screw-retained implant-supported fixed dental prostheses fabricated by CAD/CAM, copymilling, and conventional methods. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017;32:507-13.   DOI
11 Bhering CL, Marques Ida S, Takahashi JM, Barao VA, Consani RL, Mesquita MF. The effect of casting and masticatory simulation on strain and misfit of implant-supported metal frameworks. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2016;62: 746-51.   DOI
12 de França DG, Morais MH, das Neves FD, Barbosa GA. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:22-8.   DOI
13 Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-11.   DOI
14 Drago C, Howell K. Concepts for designing and fabricating metal implant frameworks for hybrid implant prostheses. J Prosthodont 2012;21:413-24.   DOI
15 Abduo J, Lyons K, Waddell N, Bennani V, Swain M. A comparison of fit of CNC-milled titanium and zirconia frameworks to implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:e20-9.   DOI
16 Pieralli S, Kohal RJ, Rabel K, von Stein-Lausnitz M, Vach K, Spies BC. Clinical outcomes of partial and full-arch all-ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:224-36.
17 Kunii J, Hotta Y, Tamaki Y, Ozawa A, Kobayashi Y, Fujishima A, Miyazaki T, Fujiwara T. Effect of sintering on the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia frameworks. Dent Mater J 2007;26:820-6.   DOI
18 Abduo J, Swain M. Influence of vertical misfit of titanium and zirconia frameworks on peri-implant strain. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:529-36.
19 Faucher RR, Nicholls JI. Distortion related to margin design in porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:149-55.   DOI
20 Nakaoka MM, Nunez-Pantoja JM, Takahashi JM, Consani RL, Mesquita MF. Misfit of pure titanium frameworks: effect of veneer coverage and spark erosion process. Acta Odontol Scand 2011;69:238-42.   DOI
21 Silva TB, De Arruda Nobilo MA, Pessanha Henriques GE, Mesquita MF, Guimaraes MB. Influence of laser-welding and electroerosion on passive fit of implant-supported prosthesis. Stomatologija 2008;10:96-100.
22 Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Branemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:270-6.
23 Farina AP, Spazzin AO, Consani RL, Mesquita MF. Screw joint stability after the application of retorque in implant-supported dentures under simulated masticatory conditions. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:499-504.   DOI
24 Bickford JH. An Introduction to the designs and behavior of bolted joints. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1995. p. 515-64.
25 Gomes EA, Tiossi R, Faria AC, Rodrigues RC, Ribeiro RF. Torque loss under mechanical cycling of long-span zirconia and titanium-cemented and screw-retained implant-supported CAD/CAM frameworks. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:1395-402.   DOI
26 Bhering CL, Mesquita MF, Kemmoku DT, Noritomi PY, Consani RL, Barao VA. Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts and framework material on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: A prototyping guided 3D-FEA study. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2016;69:715-25.   DOI
27 Presotto AG, Bhering CL, Mesquita MF, Barao VA. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:373-9.   DOI
28 ISO 14801. Dentistry - Implants - Dynamic loading test for endosseous dental implants. International Standards Organization (ISO); Geneva; Switzerland, 2016. Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=61997.
29 Presotto AGC, Barao VAR, Bhering CLB, Mesquita MF. Dimensional precision of implant-supported frameworks fabricated by 3D printing. J Prosthet Dent 2019;122:38-45.   DOI
30 Wiskott HW, Nicholls JI, Belser UC. Stress fatigue: basic principles and prosthodontic implications. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:105-16.
31 Braian M, Jonsson D, Kevci M, Wennerberg A. Geometrical accuracy of metallic objects produced with additive or subtractive manufacturing: A comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2018;34:978-93.   DOI
32 Abduo J, Lyons K, Bennamoun M. Trends in computer-aided manufacturing in prosthodontics: a review of the available streams. Int J Dent 2014;2014:783948.   DOI
33 Frost HM. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's Law for clinicians. Angle Orthod 2004;74:3-15.
34 Papanagiotou HP, Morgano SM, Giordano RA, Pober R. In vitro evaluation of low-temperature aging effects and finishing procedures on the flexural strength and structural stability of Y-TZP dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:154-64.   DOI
35 Svanborg P, Norstrom Saarva V, Stenport V, Eliasson A. Fit of 3Y-TZP complete-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses before and after porcelain veneering. J Prosthet Dent 2019;122:137-41.   DOI
36 Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:843-8.   DOI
37 Worni A, Kolgeci L, Rentsch-Kollar A, Katsoulis J, Mericske-Stern R. Zirconia-based screw-retained prostheses supported by implants: A retrospective study on technical complications and failures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:1073-81.   DOI
38 Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Nelson EW, Tietge JD. Torque required to loosen single-tooth implant abutment screws before and after simulated function. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:435-9.