Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.5.259

Color stability of provisional restorative materials with different fabrication methods  

Song, So-Yeon (Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School of Korea University)
Shin, Yo-Han (Department of Medicine, Graduate School of Korea University)
Lee, Jeong-Yol (Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Korea University Guro Hospital)
Shin, Sang-Wan (Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medical Center)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.12, no.5, 2020 , pp. 259-264 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the color stability of provisional restorative materials fabricated by 3D printing, dental milling, and conventional materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS. For the experimental groups, two commercially available 3D-printing provisional resins (E-Dent 100; EnvisionTEC GmbH, Germany & VeroGlaze™; Stratasys®, USA), two dental milling blocks (PMMA Disk; Yamahachi Dental Co., Japan & Telio®CAD; Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Liechtenstein), and two conventional materials (Alike™; GC Co., Japan & Luxatemp automix plus; DMG, Germany) were used. The water sorption and solubility test were (n=10, respectively) carried out according to ISO4049:2000 (International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland). For the color stability test (n=10), coffee and black tea were used as staining solutions, and the specimens were stored for 12 weeks. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD using SPSS version 22.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA) (P<.05). RESULTS. Alike and Veroglaze showed the highest values and Luxatemp showed the lowest water sorption. In the color stability test, the ΔE of conventional materials varied depending on the staining solution. PMMA milling blocks showed a relatively low ΔE up to 4 weeks, and then significantly increased after 8 weeks (P<.05). 3D-printed materials exhibited a high ΔE or a significant increase over time (P<.05). CONCLUSION. The degree of discoloration increased with time, and a visually perceptible color difference value (ΔE) was shown regardless of the materials and solutions. PMMA milled and 3D-printed materials showed more rapid change in discoloration after 8 weeks.
Keywords
Provisional restorative materials; 3D printing dental materials; Dental PMMA milling materials; Color stability; Water sorption; Solubility; Spectrophotometer; CIELAB color space;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Rutkunas V, Sabaliauskas V, Mizutani H. Effects of different food colorants and polishing techniques on color stability of provisional prosthetic materials. Dent Mater J 2010;29:167-76.   DOI
2 Guler AU, Yilmaz F, Kulunk T, Guler E, Kurt S. Effects of different drinks on stainability of resin composite provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:118-24.   DOI
3 Samra AP, Pereira SK, Delgado LC, Borges CP. Color stability evaluation of aesthetic restorative materials. Braz Oral Res 2008;22:205-10.   DOI
4 Rayyan MM, Aboushelib M, Sayed NM, Ibrahim A, Jimbo R. Comparison of interim restorations fabricated by CAD/CAM with those fabricated manually. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:414-9.   DOI
5 Elagra MI, Rayyan MR, Alhomaidhi MM, Alanaziy AA, Alnefaie MO. Color stability and marginal integrity of interim crowns: An in vitro study. Eur J Dent 2017;11:330-4.   DOI
6 Dawood A, Marti Marti B, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A. 3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J 2015;219:521-9.   DOI
7 Abduo J, Lyons K, Bennamoun M. Trends in computer-aided manufacturing in prosthodontics: a review of the available streams. Int J Dent 2014;2014:783948.   DOI
8 ISO 4049. Dentistry-Polymerbased restorative materials. International Standards Organization (ISO); Geneva; Switzerland, 2009.
9 Swaney AC, Paffenbarger GC, Caul HJ, Sweeney WT. American Dental Association specification No. 12 for denture base resin: second revision. J Am Dent Assoc 1953;46:54-66.   DOI
10 Carter EC, Ohno Y, Pointer MR, Robertson AR, Seve R, Schanda JD, Witt K. Commission Internationale de l'eclairage (CIE) 15:2004. Colorimetry, 3rd ed., CIE Central Bureau, Vienna, 2004.
11 Ergun G, Mutlu-Sagesen L, Ozkan Y, Demirel E. In vitro color stability of provisional crown and bridge restoration materials. Dent Mater J 2005;24:342-50.   DOI
12 Mickeviciute E, Ivanauskiene E1, Noreikiene V. In vitro color and roughness stability of different temporary restorative materials. Stomatologija 2016;18:66-72.
13 Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Dawson DV. Color stability of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resins. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:70-5.   DOI
14 Eldiwany M, Friedl KH, Powers JM. Color stability of lightcured and post-cured composites. Am J Dent 1995;8:179-81.
15 Goldstein GR, Schmitt GW. Repeatability of a specially designed intraoral colorimeter. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:616-9.   DOI
16 Akashi A, Matsuya Y, Unemori M, Akamine A. The relationship between water absorption characteristics and the mechanical strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements in long-term water storage. Biomaterials 1999;20:1573-8.   DOI
17 Rosenstiel S, Fijimoto J, Land M. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Elsevier, 2000. p. 381.
18 Anusavice KJ, Philips R. Phillips' Science of Dental Materials. 11th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier, 2003. p. 145-6.
19 Sham AS, Chu FC, Chai J, Chow TW. Color stability of provisional prosthodontic materials. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:447-52.   DOI