1 |
Lee DH. Digital approach to assessing the 3-dimensional misfit of fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:836-9.
DOI
|
2 |
Chen Y, Medioni G. Object modelling by registration of multiple range images. Image Vision Comput 1992;10:145-5.
DOI
|
3 |
Medina-Sotomayor P, Pascual-Moscardo A, Camps I. Accuracy of four digital scanners according to scanning strategy in complete-arch impressions. PLoS One 2018;13:e0202916.
DOI
|
4 |
Kim JE, Amelya A, Shin Y, Shim JS. Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:755-61.
DOI
|
5 |
Muller P, Ender A, Joda T, Katsoulis J. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner. Quintessence Int 2016;47:343-9.
|
6 |
Gimenez B, Ozcan M, Martinez-Rus F, Pradies G. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:e54-64.
DOI
|
7 |
Christensen GJ. Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:761-3.
DOI
|
8 |
Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:1301-4.
DOI
|
9 |
Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F. Evaluation of operating time and patient perception using conventional impression taking and intraoral scanning for crown manufacture: A split-mouth, randomized clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2018;31:55-9.
DOI
|
10 |
Winstanley RB, Carrotte PV, Johnson A. The quality of impressions for crowns and bridges received at commercial dental laboratories. Br Dent J 1997;183:209-13.
DOI
|
11 |
Londono J, Abreu A, Baker PS, Furness AR. Fabrication of a definitive obturator from a 3D cast with a chairside digital scanner for a patient with severe gag reflex: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:735-8.
DOI
|
12 |
Millstein PL. Determining the accuracy of gypsum casts made from type IV dental stone. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19:239-43.
DOI
|
13 |
Kim M, Kim J, Mai HN, Kwon TY, Choi YD, Lee CH, Lee DH. Comparative clinical study of the marginal discrepancy of fixed dental prosthesis fabricated by the milling-sintering method using a presintered alloy. J Adv Prosthodont 2019;11:280-5.
DOI
|
14 |
Grunheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;146:673-82.
DOI
|
15 |
Alsharbaty MHM, Alikhasi M, Zarrati S, Shamshiri AR. A clinical comparative study of 3-dimensional accuracy between digital and conventional implant impression techniques. J Prosthodont 2019;28:e902-8.
DOI
|
16 |
Di Fiore A, Vigolo P, Graiff L, Stellini E. Digital vs conventional workflow for screw-retained single-implant crowns: A comparison of key considerations. Int J Prosthodont 2018;31:577-9.
DOI
|
17 |
Flugge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K, Nahles S, Metzger MC. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:471-8.
DOI
|
18 |
Jeon JH, Hwang SS, Kim JH, Kim WC. Trueness and precision of scanning abutment impressions and stone models according to dental CAD/CAM evaluation standards. J Adv Prosthodont 2018;10:335-9.
DOI
|
19 |
Guth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1201-8.
DOI
|
20 |
Pan S, Guo D, Zhou Y, Jung RE, Hammerle CHF, Muhlemann S. Time efficiency and quality of outcomes in a model-free digital workflow using digital impression immediately after implant placement: A double-blind self-controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019;30:617-26.
DOI
|
21 |
Fluegge T, Att W, Metzger M, Nelson K. A novel method to evaluate precision of optical implant impressions with commercial scan bodies-An experimental approach. J Prosthodont 2017;26:34-41.
DOI
|
22 |
Lee SJ, Betensky RA, Gianneschi GE, Gallucci GO. Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:715-9.
DOI
|
23 |
Keeling A, Wu J, Ferrari M. Confounding factors affecting the marginal quality of an intra-oral scan. J Dent 2017;59:33-40.
DOI
|
24 |
Kim JH, Kim KB, Kim SH, Kim WC, Kim HY, Kim JH. Quantitative evaluation of common errors in digital impression obtained by using an LED blue light in-office CAD/CAM system. Quintessence Int 2015;46:401-7.
DOI
|
25 |
Pesce P, Pera F, Setti P, Menini M. Precision and accuracy of a digital impression scanner in full-arch implant rehabilitation. Int J Prosthodont 2018;31:171-5.
DOI
|
26 |
Seo SW, Lee WS, Byun JY, Lee KB. A standardization model based on image recognition for performance evaluation of an oral scanner. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:409-15.
DOI
|
27 |
Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ, Wismeijer DW. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:186-94.
DOI
|
28 |
Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F. Effect of software version on the accuracy of an intraoral scanning device. Int J Prosthodont 2018;31:375-6.
DOI
|
29 |
Koch GK, Gallucci GO, Lee SJ. Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:749-54.
DOI
|
30 |
Boeddinghaus M, Breloer ES, Rehmann P, Wostmann B. Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:2027-34.
DOI
|
31 |
Kim RJ, Park JM, Shim JS. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:895-903.
DOI
|
32 |
Hayama H, Fueki K, Wadachi J, Wakabayashi N. Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible. J Prosthodont Res 2018;62:347-52.
DOI
|