Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.1.1

Influence of zirconia and lithium disilicate tooth- or implant-supported crowns on wear of antagonistic and adjacent teeth  

Rosentritt, Martin (Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, UKR University Hospital Regensburg)
Schumann, Frederik (Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, UKR University Hospital Regensburg)
Krifka, Stephanie (Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, UKR University Hospital Regensburg)
Preis, Verena (Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, UKR University Hospital Regensburg)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.12, no.1, 2020 , pp. 1-8 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. To investigate the influence of crown material (lithium-disilicate, 3Y-TZP zirconia) and abutment type (rigid implant, resin tooth with artificial periodontium) on wear performance of their antagonist teeth and adjacent teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A mandibular left first molar (#36) with adjacent human teeth (mandibular left second premolar: #35, mandibular left second molar: #37) and antagonistic human teeth (maxillary left second premolar: #25, maxillary left first molar: #26, maxillary left second molar: #27) was prepared simulating a section of the jaw. Samples were made with extracted human molars (Reference), crowned implants (Implant), or crowned resin tooth analogues (Tooth). Crowns (tooth #36; n = 16/material) were milled from lithium-disilicate (Li, IPS e.max CAD) or 3Y-TZP zirconia (Zr, IPS e.max ZirCAD, both Ivoclar Vivadent). Thermal cycling and mechanical loading (TCML) in the chewing simulator were applied simulating 15 years of clinical service. Wear traces were analyzed (frequency [n], depth [㎛]) and evaluated using scanning electron pictures. Wear results were compared by one-way-ANOVA and post-hoc-Bonferroni (α = 0.05). RESULTS. After TCML, no visible wear traces were found on Zr. Li showed more wear traces (n = 30-31) than the reference (n = 21). Antagonistic teeth #26 showed more wear traces in contact to both ceramics (n = 27-29) than to the reference (n = 21). Strong wear traces (> 350 ㎛) on antagonists and their adjacent teeth were found only in crowned groups. Abutment type influenced number and depth of wear facets on the antagonistic and adjacent teeth. CONCLUSION. The clinically relevant model with human antagonistic and adjacent teeth allowed for a limited comparison of the wear situation. The total number of wear traces and strong wear on crowns, antagonistic and adjacent teeth were influenced by crown material.
Keywords
Zirconia; Ceramics; Crowns; Implant; Wear;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Alghazzawi TF, Lemons J, Liu PR, Essig ME, Bartolucci AA, Janowski GM. Influence of low-temperature environmental exposure on the mechanical properties and structural stability of dental zirconia. J Prosthodont 2012;21:363-9.   DOI
2 Salazar Marocho SM, Studart AR, Bottino MA, Bona AD. Mechanical strength and subcritical crack growth under wet cyclic loading of glass-infiltrated dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2010;26:483-90.   DOI
3 Zhang Y, Song JK, Lawn BR. Deep-penetrating conical cracks in brittle layers from hydraulic cyclic contact. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;73:186-93.   DOI
4 Pathan MS, Kheur MG, Patankar AH, Kheur SM. Assessment of antagonist enamel wear and clinical performance of fullcontour monolithic zirconia crowns: One-year results of a prospective study. J Prosthodont 2019;28:e411-6.   DOI
5 Rabel K, Spies BC, Pieralli S, Vach K, Kohal RJ. The clinical performance of all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:196-223.
6 Chong BJ, Thangavel AK, Rolton SB, Guazzato M, Klineberg IJ. Clinical and laboratory surface finishing procedures for zirconia on opposing human enamel wear: A laboratory study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2015;50:93-103.   DOI
7 Rauch A, Reich S, Dalchau L, Schierz O. Clinical survival of chair-side generated monolithic lithium disilicate crowns:10- year results. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:1763-9.   DOI
8 Ludovichetti FS, Trindade FZ, Werner A, Kleverlaan CJ, Fonseca RG. Wear resistance and abrasiveness of CAD-CAM monolithic materials. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:318.e1-8.
9 Hayashi S, Homma S, Takanashi T, Hirano T, Yoshinari M, Yajima Y. Wear properties of esthetic dental materials against translucent zirconia. Dent Mater J 2019;38:250-6.   DOI
10 Preis V, Grumser K, Schneider-Feyrer S, Behr M, Rosentritt M. Cycle-dependent in vitro wear performance of dental ceramics after clinical surface treatments. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016;53:49-58.   DOI
11 Gou M, Chen H, Kang J, Wang H. Antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns in vivo: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:598-603.   DOI
12 Preis V, Behr M, Handel G, Schneider-Feyrer S, Hahnel S, Rosentritt M. Wear performance of dental ceramics after grinding and polishing treatments. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2012;10:13-22.   DOI
13 D'Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Rondoni GD, Vadini M, De Angelis F. Wear evaluation of prosthetic materials opposing themselves. Oper Dent 2018;43:38-50.   DOI
14 D'Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Rondoni GD, De Angelis F. Wear properties of dental ceramics and porcelains compared with human enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:350-5.   DOI
15 Nakashima J, Taira Y, Sawase T. In vitro wear of four ceramic materials and human enamel on enamel antagonist. Eur J Oral Sci 2016;124:295-300.   DOI
16 Wiegand A, Crede A, Tschammler C, Attin T, Taubock TT. Enamel wear by antagonistic restorative materials under erosive conditions. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:2689-93.   DOI
17 Fathy SM, Swain MV. In-vitro wear of natural tooth surface opposed with zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic after accelerated ageing. Dent Mater 2018;34:551-9.   DOI
18 Zheng J, Zeng Y, Wen J, Zheng L, Zhou Z. Impact wear behavior of human tooth enamel under simulated chewing conditions. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016;62:119-27.   DOI
19 Zandparsa R, El Huni RM, Hirayama H, Johnson MI. Effect of different dental ceramic systems on the wear of human enamel: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:230-7.   DOI
20 Lee A, Swain M, He L, Lyons K. Wear behavior of human enamel against lithium disilicate glass ceramic and type III gold. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1399-405.   DOI
21 Hartkamp O, Lohbauer U, Reich S. Antagonist wear by polished zirconia crowns. Int J Comput Dent 2017;20:263-74.
22 Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Kim MJ, Hsu SM, Abdulhameed N, Jenkins R, Neal D, Ren F, Clark AE. Randomized clinical study of wear of enamel antagonists against polished monolithic zirconia crowns. J Dent 2018;68:19-27.   DOI
23 Yang SW, Kim JE, Shin Y, Shim JS, Kim JH. Enamel wear and aging of translucent zirconias: In vitro and clinical studies. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:417-25.   DOI
24 Lohbauer U, Reich S. Antagonist wear of monolithic zirconia crowns after 2 years. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:1165-72.   DOI
25 Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res 1989;68:1752-4.   DOI
26 Rashid H, Sheikh Z, Misbahuddin S, Kazmi MR, Qureshi S, Uddin MZ. Advancements in all-ceramics for dental restorations and their effect on the wear of opposing dentition. Eur J Dent 2016;10:583-8.   DOI
27 Rosentritt M, Behr M, Scharnagl P, Handel G, Kolbeck C. Influence of resilient support of abutment teeth on fracture resistance of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:465-8.
28 Scharnagl P, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Handel G. Simulation of physiological tooth mobility in in-vitro stress examination of dental restorations in the masticator. J Dent Res 1998;77:1260.
29 Rosentritt M, Behr M, van der Zel JM, Feilzer AJ. Approach for valuating the influence of laboratory simulation. Dent Mater 2009;25:348-52.   DOI
30 Rosentritt M, Siavikis G, Behr M, Kolbeck C, Handel G. Approach for valuating the significance of laboratory simulation. J Dent 2008;36:1048-53.   DOI
31 Preis V, Weiser F, Handel G, Rosentritt M. Wear performance of monolithic dental ceramics with different surface treatments. Quintessence Int 2013;44:393-405.
32 Lawson NC, Janyavula S, Syklawer S, McLaren EA, Burgess JO. Wear of enamel opposing zirconia and lithium disilicate after adjustment, polishing and glazing. J Dent 2014;42:1586-91.   DOI
33 Rosentritt M, Schneider-Feyrer S, Behr M, Preis V. In vitro shock absorption tests on implant-supported crowns: Influence of crown materials and luting agents. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33:116-22.   DOI
34 Tsumita M, Kokubo Y, Ohkubo C, Sakurai S, Fukushima S. Clinical evaluation of posterior all-ceramic FPDs (Cercon): a prospective clinical pilot study. J Prosthodont Res 2010;54:102-5.   DOI
35 Preis V, Schmalzbauer M, Bougeard D, Schneider-Feyrer S, Rosentritt M. Surface properties of monolithic zirconia after dental adjustment treatments and in vitro wear simulation. J Dent 2015;43:133-9.   DOI
36 Teichmann M, Wienert AL, Ruckbeil M, Weber V, Wolfart S, Edelhoff D. Ten-year survival and chipping rates and clinical quality grading of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:2905-15.   DOI
37 Schmitter M, Mueller D, Rues S. Chipping behaviour of allceramic crowns with zirconia framework and CAD/CAM manufactured veneer. J Dent 2012;40:154-62.   DOI
38 Rosentritt M, Preis V, Behr M, Hahnel S, Handel G, Kolbeck C. Two-body wear of dental porcelain and substructure oxide ceramics. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:935-43.   DOI
39 Preis V, Behr M, Kolbeck C, Hahnel S, Handel G, Rosentritt M. Wear performance of substructure ceramics and veneering porcelains. Dent Mater 2011;27:796-804.   DOI
40 Preis V, Grumser K, Schneider-Feyrer S, Behr M, Rosentritt M. The effectiveness of polishing kits: influence on surface roughness of zirconia. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:149-51.   DOI
41 Bartolo D, Cassar G, Al-Haj Husain N, Ozcan M, Camilleri J. Effect of polishing procedures and hydrothermal aging on wear characteristics and phase transformation of zirconium dioxide. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:545-51.   DOI
42 Al-Haj Husain N, Camilleri J, Ozcan M. Effect of polishing instruments and polishing regimens on surface topography and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia: An evaluation with XPS and XRD analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016;64:104-12.   DOI
43 Al-Haj Husain N, Ozcan M. A study on topographical properties and surface wettability of monolithic zirconia after use of diverse polishing instruments with different surface coatings. J Prosthodont 2018;27:429-42.   DOI