Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.4.193

Color alterations of a PMMA resin for fixed interim prostheses reinforced with silica nanoparticles  

Kotanidis, Alexandros (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki)
Kontonasaki, Eleana (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki)
Koidis, Petros (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.11, no.4, 2019 , pp. 193-201 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the color changes of an autopolymerizing PMMA resin used for interim fixed restorations, reinforced with $SiO_2$ nanoparticles. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Silica nanoparticles were blended with the PMMA resin powder through high-energy ball milling. Four shades of PMMA resin were used (A3, B3, C3, D3) and total color differences were calculated through the equations ${\Delta}E_{ab}=[({\Delta}L*)^2+({\Delta}a*)^2+({\Delta}b*)^2]^{1/2}$ and ${\Delta}E_{00}=[(\frac{{\Delta}L^{\prime}}{K_LS_L})^2+(\frac{{\Delta}C^{\prime}}{K_CS_C})^2+(\frac{{\Delta}H^{\prime}}{K_HS_H})^2+R_T(\frac{{\Delta}C^{\prime}}{K_CS_C})(\frac{{\Delta}H^{\prime}}{K_HS_H})]^{1/2}$. Statistically significant differences between ${\Delta}E_{ab}$ and the clinically acceptable values of 3.3 and 2.7 and those between ${\Delta}E_{00}$ and the clinically acceptable value of 1.8 were evaluated with one sample t-test (P<.05). Differences among the different shades were assessed through One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni multiple comparison tests. RESULTS. Significantly lower values were detected for all groups concerning ${\Delta}E_{ab}$ compared to the intraorally clinical acceptable values of 3.3 and 2.7. Significantly lower mean values were detected for groups B3, C3, and D3, concerning ${\Delta}E_{00}$ compared to the intraorally clinical acceptant value of 1.8. Color pigments in red-brown (A3) and red-grey (D3) shades affect the total color change to a greater extent after the reinforcement with $SiO_2$ nanoparticles compared to the red-yellow (B3) shade. CONCLUSION. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it can be suggested that reinforcing PMMA with $SiO_2$ nanoparticles at 0.25 wt% slightly affects the optical properties of the PMMA resin without being clinically perceivable.
Keywords
Polymethylmethacrylate resin; Silica nanoparticles; Color;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Gratton DG, Aquilino SA. Interim restorations. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:vii, 487-97.   DOI
2 Kaiser DA, Cavazos E Jr. Temporization techniques in fixed prosthodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1985;29:403-12.
3 Young HM, Smith CT, Morton D. Comparative in vitro evaluation of two provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:129-32.   DOI
4 Tjong S.C. Structural and mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng R Reports 2006;53:73-197.   DOI
5 Alhavaz A, Rezaei Dastjerdi M, Ghasemi A, Ghasemi A, Alizadeh Sahraei A. Effect of untreated zirconium oxide nanofiller on the flexural strength and surface hardness of autopolymerized interim fixed restoration resins. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017;29:264-9.   DOI
6 Zuccari AG, Oshida Y, Moore BK. Reinforcement of acrylic resins for provisional fixed restorations. Part I: Mechanical properties. Biomed Mater Eng 1997;7:327-43.
7 Protopapa P, Kontonasaki E, Bikiaris D, Paraskevopoulos KM, Koidis P. Reinforcement of a PMMA resin for fixed interim prostheses with nanodiamonds. Dent Mater J 2011;30:222-31.   DOI
8 Larson WR, Dixon DL, Aquilino SA, Clancy JM. The effect of carbon graphite fiber reinforcement on the strength of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resins. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:816-20.   DOI
9 Gutteridge DL. Reinforcement of poly(methyl methacrylate) with ultra-high-modulus polyethylene fibre. J Dent 1992;20:50-4.   DOI
10 Panyayong W, Oshida Y, Andres CJ, Barco TM, Brown DT, Hovijitra S. Reinforcement of acrylic resins for provisional fixed restorations. Part III: effects of addition of titania and zirconia mixtures on some mechanical and physical properties. Biomed Mater Eng 2002;12:353-66.
11 Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:318-26.   DOI
12 Kim SH, Watts DC. Effect of glass-fiber reinforcement and water storage on fracture toughness (KIC) of polymer-based provisional crown and FPD materials. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:318-22.
13 Priyadarsini S, Mukherjee S, Mishra M. Nanoparticles used in dentistry: A review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2018;8:58-67.   DOI
14 Vallittu PK. A review of methods used to reinforce polymethyl methacrylate resin. J Prosthodont 1995;4:183-7.   DOI
15 Geerts GA, Overturf JH, Oberholzer TG. The effect of different reinforcements on the fracture toughness of materials for interim restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:461-7.   DOI
16 Hamza TA, Rosenstiel SF, Elhosary MM, Ibraheem RM. The effect of fiber reinforcement on the fracture toughness and flexural strength of provisional restorative resins. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:258-64.   DOI
17 Nohrstrom TJ, Vallittu PK, Yli-Urpo A. The effect of placement and quantity of glass fibers on the fracture resistance of interim fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:72-8.
18 Topouzi M, Kontonasaki E, Bikiaris D, Papadopoulou L, Paraskevopoulos KM, Koidis P. Reinforcement of a PMMA resin for interim fixed prostheses with silica nanoparticles. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2017;69:213-22.   DOI
19 O' Brien W-J. Color and appearance. In: O' Brien WJ, ed. Dental materials and their selection. USA: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc.; 2002. p. 24-36.
20 Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:200-8.   DOI
21 Gomez-Polo C, Munoz MP, Lorenzo Luengo MC, Vicente P, Galindo P, Martin Casado AM. Comparison of the CIELab and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:65-70.   DOI
22 Ruyter IE, Nilner K, Moller B. Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers. Dent Mater 1987;3:246-51.   DOI
23 Luo MR, Cui G, Rigg B. The development of the CIE 2000 colour-difference formula: CIEDE2000. Color Res Appl 2001;26:340-50.   DOI
24 Wee AG, Lindsey DT, Shroyer KM, Johnston WM. Use of a porcelain color discrimination test to evaluate color difference formulas. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:101-9.   DOI
25 Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Bona AD, Igiel C, Linninger M, Sakai M, Takahashi H, Tashkandi E, Perez Mdel M. Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent 2015;27:S1-9.   DOI
26 Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2006. p. 272-335.
27 Castrillo PD, Olmos D, Amador DR, Gonzalez-Benito J. Real dispersion of isolated fumed silica nanoparticles in highly filled PMMA prepared by high energy ball milling. J Colloid Interface Sci 2007;308:318-24.   DOI
28 Bohin F, Feke DL, Manas-Zloczower I. Determination of the infiltration kinetics of polymer into filler agglomerates using transient buoyancy measurements. Powder Technol 1995;83:159-62.   DOI
29 Gegauff AG, Pryor HG. Fracture toughness of provisional resins for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:23-9.   DOI
30 Ireland MF, Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Ramp MH. In vitro mechanical property comparison of four resins used for fabrication of provisional fixed restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:158-62.   DOI
31 Zeighami S, Hemmati Y-B, Falahchai M. Effect of ceramic thickness and cement color on final shade of all ceramic restoration: a systematic review. Sch Acad J Biosci 2017;5:459-64.
32 Balkenhol M, Mautner MC, Ferger P, Wostmann B. Mechanical properties of provisional crown and bridge materials: chemical-curing versus dual-curing systems. J Dent 2008;36:15-20.
33 Anni Berger-Schunn. Practical color measurement: A primer for the beginner, a reminder for the expert. New York; John Willey; 1994. p. 73-97.
34 Bikiaris DN, Vassiliou A, Pavlidou E, Karayannidis GP. Compatibilisation effect of PP-g-MA copolymer on iPP/SiO2 nanocomposites prepared by melt mixing. Eur Polym J 2005;41:1965-78.   DOI
35 Perez Mdel M, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Ionescu AM, Pomares H, Pulgar R, Paravina RD. Dental ceramics: A CIEDE2000 acceptability thresholds for lightness, chroma and hue differences. J Dent 2011;39:e37-44.
36 Noie F, O'Keefe KL, Powers JM. Color stability of resin cements after accelerated aging. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:51-5.
37 Ghinea R, Perez MM, Herrera LJ, Rivas MJ, Yebra A, Paravina RD. Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics. J Dent 2010;38:e57-64.   DOI
38 Green SB, Akey TM, Salkind NJ, Akey TM. Using SPSS for windows: Analyzing and understanding data. 7th ed. New Jersey; Pearson Education, Inc.; 1999. p. 146-50, 162-71, 232-8, 338-54.
39 Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 1989;68:819-22.   DOI
40 Seghi RR, Johnston WM, O'Brien WJ. Performance assessment of colorimetric devices on dental porcelains. J Dent Res 1989;68:1755-9.   DOI
41 Doray PG, Li D, Powers JM. Color stability of provisional restorative materials after accelerated aging. J Prosthodont 2001;10:212-6.   DOI
42 Stober T, Gilde H, Lenz P. Color stability of highly filled composite resin materials for facings. Dent Mater 2001;17:87-94.   DOI
43 Da Silva JD, Park SE, Weber HP, Ishikawa-Nagai S. Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:361-8.   DOI
44 Hunter RS, Harold RW. The measurement of appearance. 2nd ed. New York; John Wiley & Sons; 1987. p. 162-91.
45 Yoshida Y, Shirai K, Shintani H, Okazaki M, Suzuki K, Van Meerbeek B. Effect of presilanization filler decontamination on aesthetics and degradation resistance of resin composites. Dent Mater J 2002;21:383-95.   DOI
46 Arikawa H, Kanie T, Fujii K, Takahashi H, Ban S. Effect of filler properties in composite resins on light transmittance characteristics and color. Dent Mater J 2007;26:38-44.   DOI
47 Lim YK, Lee YK, Lim BS, Rhee SH, Yang HC. Influence of filler distribution on the color parameters of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater 2008;24:67-73.   DOI
48 Emami N, Sjodahl M, Soderholm KJ. How filler properties, filler fraction, sample thickness and light source affect light attenuation in particulate filled resin composites. Dent Mater 2005;21:721-30.   DOI
49 Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1382-90.   DOI
50 Masotti AS, Onofrio AB, Conceicao EN, Spohr AM. UV-vis spectrophotometric direct transmittance analysis of composite resins. Dent Mater 2007;23:724-30.   DOI
51 Goodkind RJ, Schwabacher WB. Use of a fiber-optic colorimeter for in vivo color measurements of 2830 anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:535-42.   DOI