Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.2.128

Physical characteristics of ceramic/glass-polymer based CAD/CAM materials: Effect of finishing and polishing techniques  

Ekici, Mugem Asli (Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University)
Egilmez, Ferhan (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University)
Cekic-Nagas, Isil (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University)
Ergun, Gulfem (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.11, no.2, 2019 , pp. 128-137 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on water absorption, water solubility, and microhardness of ceramic or glass-polymer based computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials following thermocycling. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 150 disc-shaped specimens were prepared from three different hybrid materials and divided into five subgroups according to the applied surface polishing techniques. All specimens were subjected up to #4000 grit SiC paper grinding. No additional polishing has been done to the control group (Group I). Other polishing procedures were as follows: Group II: two-stage diamond impregnated polishing discs; Group III: yellow colored rubber based silicone discs; Group IV: diamond polishing paste; and Group V: Aluminum oxide polishing discs. Subsequently, 5000-cycles of thermocycling were applied. The analyses were conducted after 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days of water immersion. Water absorption and water solubility results were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests. Besides, microhardness data were compared by Kruskal-Wallis and MannWhitney U tests (P<.05). RESULTS. Surface polishing procedures had significant effects on water absorption and solubility and surface microhardness of resin ceramics (P<.05). Group IV exhibited the lowest water absorption and the highest microhardness values (P<.05). Immersion periods had no effect on the microhardness of hybrid ceramic materials (P>.05). CONCLUSION. Surface finishing and polishing procedures might negatively affect physical properties of hybrid ceramic materials. Nevertheless, immersion periods do not affect the microhardness of the materials. Final polishing by using diamond polishing paste can be recommended for all CAD/CAM materials.
Keywords
Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM); Hybrid ceramics; Dental polishing; Water hardness; Water solubility;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Stawarczyk B, Awad D, Ilie N. Blue-Light transmittance of esthetic monolithic CAD/CAM materials with respect to their composition, thickness, and curing conditions. Oper Dent 2016;41:531-40.   DOI
2 Fasbinder DJ, Neiva GF. Surface evaluation of polishing techniques for new resilient CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016;28:56-66.   DOI
3 Vichi A, Fonzar RF, Goracci C, Carrabba M, Ferrari M. Effect of finishing and polishing on roughness and gloss of lithium disilicate and lithium silicate zirconia reinforced glass ceramic for CAD/CAM systems. Oper Dent 2018;43:90-100.   DOI
4 Acar B, Egilmez F. Effects of various polishing techniques and thermal cycling on the surface roughness and color change of polymer-based CAD/CAM materials. Am J Dent 2018;31:91-6.
5 Alshali RZ, Salim NA, Satterthwaite JD, Silikas N. Long-term sorption and solubility of bulk-fill and conventional resincomposites in water and artificial saliva. J Dent 2015;43:1511-8.   DOI
6 Tekce N, Pala K, Demirci M, Tuncer S. Changes in surface characteristics of two different resin composites after 1 year water storage: An SEM and AFM study. Scanning 2016;38:694-700.   DOI
7 Egilmez F, Ergun G, Cekic-Nagas I, Vallittu PK, Lassila LVJ. Does artificial aging affect mechanical properties of CAD/CAM composite materials. J Prosthodont Res 2018;62:65-74.   DOI
8 Hampe R, Lumkemann N, Sener B, Stawarczyk B. The effect of artificial aging on Martens hardness and indentation modulus of different dental CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018;86:191-8.   DOI
9 El Gezawi M, Kaisarly D, Al-Saleh H, ArRejaie A, Al-Harbi F, Kunzelmann KH. Degradation potential of bulk versus incrementally applied and indirect composites: color, microhardness, and surface deterioration. Oper Dent 2016;41:e195-208.   DOI
10 Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Fuentes V, Prati C, Garcia-Godoy F. Sorption and solubility of resin-based restorative dental materials. J Dent 2003;31:43-50.   DOI
11 Poplawski T, Loba K, Pawlowska E, Szczepanska J, Blasiak J. Genotoxicity of urethane dimethacrylate, a tooth restoration component. Toxicol in vitro 2010;24:854-62.   DOI
12 Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 2014;93:1232-4.   DOI
13 ISO 4049. Dentistry - Polymer-based restorative materials. International Standards Organization (ISO); Geneva; Switzerland, 2009. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/42898.html
14 Gajewski VE, Pfeifer CS, Froes-Salgado NR, Boaro LC, Braga RR. Monomers used in resin composites: degree of conversion, mechanical properties and water sorption/solubility. Braz Dent J 2012;23:508-14.   DOI
15 Belli R, Geinzer E, Muschweck A, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations. Dent Mater 2014;30:424-32.   DOI
16 Vasudeva G. Monomer systems for dental composites and their future: a review. J Calif Dent Assoc 2009;37:389-98.
17 Takeshige F, Kawakami Y, Hayashi M, Ebisu S. Fatigue behavior of resin composites in aqueous environments. Dent Mater 2007;23:893-9.   DOI
18 Fleming GJ, Awan M, Cooper PR, Sloan AJ. The potential of a resin-composite to be cured to a 4mm depth. Dent Mater 2008;24:522-9.   DOI
19 Liebermann A, Wimmer T, Schmidlin PR, Scherer H, Loffler P, Roos M, Stawarczyk B. Physicomechanical characterization of polyetheretherketone and current esthetic dental CAD/CAM polymers after aging in different storage media. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:321-8.   DOI
20 Rodrigues SA Jr, Ferracane JL, Della Bona A. Flexural strength and Weibull analysis of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite evaluated by 3- and 4-point bending tests. Dent Mater 2008;24:426-31.   DOI
21 American Dental Association. Reports of councils and bureaus revised American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association specification no 27 for resin-based filling materials. 1988. p. 8-9.
22 Watanabe T, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa H, Rikuta A, Ando S. Influence of polishing duration on surface roughness of resin composites. J Oral Sci 2005;47:21-5.   DOI
23 Venturini D, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM. Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2006;31:11-7.   DOI
24 Aytac F, Karaarslan ES, Agaccioglu M, Tastan E, Buldur M, Kuyucu E. Effects of novel finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness and morphology of nanocomposites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016;28:247-61.   DOI
25 Rinastiti M, Ozcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ. Effects of surface conditioning on repair bond strengths of nonaged and aged microhybrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled composite resins. Clin Oral Investig 2011;15;625-33.   DOI
26 Egilmez F, Ergun G, Cekic-Nagas I, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Short and long term effects of additional post curing and polishing systems on the color change of dental nano-composites. Dent Mater J 2013;32:107-14.   DOI
27 Bottino MC, Valandro LF, Kantorski KZ, Bressiani JC, Bottino MA. Polishing methods of an alumina-reinforced feldspar ceramic. Braz Dent J 2006;17:285-9.   DOI