Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.2.112

Evaluation of reliability of zirconia materials to be used in implant-retained restoration on the atrophic bone of the posterior maxilla: A finite element study  

Degirmenci, Kubra (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University)
Kocak-Buyukdere, Ayse (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kocaeli University)
Ekici, Bulent (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Marmara University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.11, no.2, 2019 , pp. 112-119 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. Zirconia materials have been used for implant-retained restorations, but the stress distribution of zirconia is not entirely clear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the stress distribution and risky areas caused by the different design of zirconia restorations on the atrophic bone of the posterior maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS. An edentulous D4-type bone model was prepared from radiography of an atrophic posterior maxilla. Monolithic zirconia and zirconia-fused porcelain implant-retained restorations were designed as splinted or non-splinted. 300-N occlusal forces were applied obliquely. Stress analyses were performed using a 3D FEA program. RESULTS. According to stress analysis, the bone between the 1) molar implant and the 2) premolar in the non-splinted monolithic zirconia restoration model was stated as the riskiest area. Similarly, the maximum von Mises stress value was detected on the bone of the non-splinted monolithic zirconia models. CONCLUSION. Splinting of implant-retained restorations can be more critical for monolithic zirconia than zirconia fused to porcelain for the longevity of the bone.
Keywords
Finite element analysis; Dental implant; Implant-retained restoration; Zirconia; Posterior maxilla;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Behnaz E, Ramin M, Abbasi S, Pouya MA, Mahmood F. The effect of implant angulation and splinting on stress distribution in implant body and supporting bone: A finite element analysis. Eur J Dent 2015;9:311-8.   DOI
2 Guichet DL, Yoshinobu D, Caputo AA. Effect of splinting and interproximal contact tightness on load transfer by implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:528-35.   DOI
3 Okumura N, Stegaroiu R, Kitamura E, Kurokawa K, Nomura S. Influence of maxillary cortical bone thickness, implant design and implant diameter on stress around implants: a threedimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthodont Res 2010;54:133-42.   DOI
4 Goiato MC, dos Santos DM, Santiago JF Jr, Moreno A, Pellizzer EP. Longevity of dental implants in type IV bone: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;43:1108-16.   DOI
5 Schwitalla AD, Abou-Emara M, Spintig T, Lackmann J, Muller WD. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on the peri-implant bone. J Biomech 2015;48:1-7.   DOI
6 Amornvit P, Rokaya D, Keawcharoen K, Thongpulsawasdi N. Stress distribution in implant retained finger prosthesis: a finite element study. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:2851-4.
7 Archangelo CM, Rocha EP, Pereira JA, Martin Junior M, Anchieta RB, Freitas Junior AC. Periodontal ligament influence on the stress distribution in a removable partial denture supported by implant: a finite element analysis. J Appl Oral Sci 2012;20:362-8.   DOI
8 Tsouknidas A, Giannopoulos D, Savvakis S, Michailidis N, Lympoudi E, Fytanidis D, Pissiotis A, Michalakis K. The influence of bone quality on the biomechanical behavior of a tooth-implant fixed partial denture: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:e143-54.   DOI
9 Wheleer MA. Dental anatomy, phisology and occlusion. 8th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2010. p. 216, 230, 264, 280.
10 Massoumi F, Taheri M, Mohammadi A, Amelirad O. Evaluation of the effect of buccolingual and apicocoronal positions of dental implants on stress and strain in alveolar bone by finite element analysis. J Dent (Tehran) 2018;15:10-9.
11 Gomes de Oliveira S, Seraidarian PI, Landre J Jr, Oliveira DD, Cavalcanti BN. Tooth displacement due to occlusal contacts: a three-dimensional finite element study. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:874-80.   DOI
12 Michailidis N, Karabinas G, Tsouknidas A, Maliaris G, Tsipas D, Koidis P. A FEM based endosteal implant simulation to determine the effect of peri-implant bone resorption on stress induced implant failure. Biomed Mater Eng 2013; 23:317-27.
13 Isidor F. Influence of forces on peri-implant bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:8-18.   DOI
14 Rubo JH, Capello Souza EA. Finite-element analysis of stress on dental implant prosthesis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12:105-13.   DOI
15 Coelho PG, Silva NR, Bonfante EA, Guess PC, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Fatigue testing of two porcelain-zirconia allceramic crown systems. Dent Mater 2009;25:1122-7.   DOI
16 Merli M, Bianchini E, Mariotti G, Moscatelli M, Piemontese M, Rappelli G, Nieri M. Ceramic vs composite veneering of full arch implant-supported zirconium frameworks: assessing patient preference and satisfaction. A crossover double-blind randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2017;10:311-22.   DOI
17 Salihoglu U, Boynuegri D, Engin D, Duman AN, Gokalp P, Balos K. Bacterial adhesion and colonization differences between zirconium oxide and titanium alloys: an in vivo human study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:101-7.
18 Guven S, Beydemir K, Dundar S, Eratilla V. Evaluation of stress distributions in peri-implant and periodontal bone tissues in 3- and 5-unit tooth and implant-supported fixed zirconia restorations by finite elements analysis. Eur J Dent 2015;9:329-39.   DOI
19 Ferreira MB, Barao VA, Faverani LP, Hipolito AC, Assuncao WG. The role of superstructure material on the stress distribution in mandibular full-arch implant-supported fixed dentures. A CT-based 3D-FEA. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2014;35:92-9.   DOI
20 Weigl P, Sander A, Wu Y, Felber R, Lauer HC, Rosentritt M. In-vitro performance and fracture strength of thin monolithic zirconia crowns. J Adv Prosthodont 2018;10:79-84.   DOI
21 Zhang G, Yuan H, Chen X, Wang W, Chen J, Liang J, Zhang P. A three-dimensional finite element study on the biomechanical simulation of various structured dental implants and their surrounding bone tissues. Int J Dent 2016;2016:4867402.
22 Eazhil R, Swaminathan SV, Gunaseelan M, Kannan GV, Alagesan C. Impact of implant diameter and length on stress distribution in osseointegrated implants: A 3D FEA study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2016;6:590-6.   DOI
23 Seker E, Ulusoy M, Ozan O, Dogan D, Kusakci seker B. Biomechanical effects of different fixed partial denture designs planned on bicortically anchored short, graft-supported long, or 45-degree-inclined long implants in the posterior maxilla: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:e1-9.   DOI
24 Testori T, Del Fabbro M, Capelli M, Zuffetti F, Francetti L, Weinstein RL. Immediate occlusal loading and tilted implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: 1-year interim results of a multicenter prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:227-32.   DOI
25 Almeida EO, Rocha EP, Freitas Junior AC, Anchieta RB, Poveda R, Gupta N, Coelho PG. Tilted and short implants supporting fixed prosthesis in an atrophic maxilla: a 3D-FEA biomechanical evaluation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:e332-42.   DOI
26 Fortin Y, Sullivan RM, Rangert BR. The Marius implant bridge: surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation for the completely edentulous upper jaw with moderate to severe resorption: a 5-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002;4:69-77.   DOI
27 Lan TH, Liu PH, Chou MM, Lee HE. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns with different occlusal thicknesses in implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:76-83.   DOI
28 Pozzi A, Holst S, Fabbri G, Tallarico M. Clinical reliability of CAD/CAM cross-arch zirconia bridges on immediately loaded implants placed with computer-assisted/template-guided surgery: a retrospective study with a follow-up between 3 and 5 years. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:e86-96.   DOI
29 Abdulmajeed AA, Lim KG, Narhi TO, Cooper LF. Completearch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:672-7.   DOI
30 Cheng CW, Chien CH, Chen CJ, Papaspyridakos P. Clinical results and technical complications of posterior implant-supported modified monolithic zirconia single crowns and shortspan fixed dental prostheses: A 2-year pilot study. J Prosthodont 2018;27:108-14.   DOI
31 de Souza Batista VE, Verri FR, Lemos CAA, Cruz RS, Oliveira HFF, Gomes JML, Pellizzer EP. Should the restoration of adjacent implants be splinted or nonsplinted? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:41-51.   DOI
32 Toniollo MB, Macedo AP, Pupim D, Zaparolli D, da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos M. Finite element analysis of bone stress in the posterior mandible using regular and short implants, in the same context, with splinted and nonsplinted prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017;32:e199-e206.   DOI
33 Yan X, Zhang X, Chi W, Ai H, Wu L. Comparing the influence of crestal cortical bone and sinus floor cortical bone in posterior maxilla bi-cortical dental implantation: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Acta Odontol Scand 2015;73:312-20.   DOI
34 El-Anwar MI, Yousief SA, Soliman TA, Saleh MM, Omar WS. A finite element study on stress distribution of two different attachment designs under implant supported overdenture. Saudi Dent J 2015;27:201-7.   DOI
35 Li T, Yang X, Zhang D, Zhou H, Shao J, Ding Y, Kong L. Analysis of the biomechanical feasibility of a wide implant in moderately atrophic maxillary sinus region with finite element method. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;114:e1-8.   DOI
36 Geramy A, Rokn A, Keshtkar A, Monzavi A, Hashemi HM, Bitaraf T. Comparison of short and standard implants in the posterior mandible: A 3D analysis using finite element method. J Dent (Tehran) 2018;15:130-6.
37 Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Duyck J, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:381-9.   DOI
38 Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Quirynen M, Duyck J, van Steenberghe D, Jacobs R. Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. Part 2: a longitudinal radiographic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:390-5.   DOI