1 |
Van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12.
DOI
|
2 |
Braian M, Jimbo R, Wennerberg A. Production tolerance of additive manufactured polymeric objects for clinical applications. Dent Mater 2016;32:853-61.
DOI
|
3 |
Koch GK, Gallucci GO, Lee SJ. Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:749-54.
DOI
|
4 |
ISO-12836. Digitizing devices for CAD/CAM systems for indirect dental restorations - Test methods for assessing accuracy. International Standards for Organization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland, 2012. Available at: https://www.iso.org/iso/store.html.
|
5 |
ISO-5725-1. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Part 1: General principles and definitions. International Standards for Organization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland, 1994. Available at: https://www.iso.org/ iso/store.html
|
6 |
Kirsch C, Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. Trueness of four different milling procedures used in dental CAD/CAM systems. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:551-8.
DOI
|
7 |
Bosch G, Ender A, Mehl A. A 3-dimensional accuracy analysis of chairside CAD/CAM milling processes. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1425-31.
DOI
|
8 |
Schaefer O, Watts DC, Sigusch BW, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: A three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility. Dent Mater 2012;28:320-26.
DOI
|
9 |
Jeong ID, Kim WC, Park J, Kim CM, Kim JH. Ceramic molar crown reproducibility by digital workflow manufacturing: An in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:252-56.
DOI
|
10 |
Lee WS, Lee DH, Lee KB. Evaluation of internal fit of inter- im crown fabricated with CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing system. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:265-70.
DOI
|
11 |
Kim KB, Kim JH, Kim WC, Kim JH. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of three-unit fixed dental prostheses produced by stereolithography. Dent Mater J 2014;33:504-9.
DOI
|
12 |
Park JY, Bae SY, Lee JJ, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of three different dental prostheses: Comparison of the silicone replica technique and three-dimensional superimposition analysis. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:159-69.
DOI
|
13 |
Al-Imam, Hiba, M Gram. AR Benetti, K Gotfredsen. Accuracy of stereolithography additive casts used in a digital workflow. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119; 580-85.
DOI
|
14 |
Kim DY, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Reproducibility of different arrangement of resin copings by dental microstereolithography: Evaluating the marginal discrepancy of resin copings. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:260-65.
DOI
|
15 |
Young HM, Smith CT, Morton D. Comparative in vitro evaluation of two provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:129-32.
DOI
|
16 |
Nejatidanesh F, Lotfi HR, Savabi O. Marginal accuracy of interim restorations fabricated from four interim autopolymerizing resins. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:364-67.
DOI
|
17 |
Karaokutan I, Sayin G, Kara O. In vitro study of fracture strength of provisional crown materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:27-31.
DOI
|
18 |
Ferracane J. Elution of leachable components from composites. J Oral Rehabil 1994;21:441-52.
DOI
|
19 |
Poticny DJ, Klim J. CAD/CAM in-office technology: Innovations after 25 years for predictable, esthetic outcomes. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:5S-9S.
DOI
|
20 |
Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:555-60.
DOI
|
21 |
Kim CM, Kim SR, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Trueness of milled prostheses according to number of ball-end mill burs. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:624-29.
DOI
|
22 |
Kim DY, Lee HN, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in single and three-unit metal frameworks made by micro-stereolithography. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:239-43.
DOI
|