Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.1.50

The effect of glazing and aging on the surface properties of CAD/CAM resin blocks  

Tekce, Neslihan (Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Kocaeli University)
Fidan, Sinan (Department of Airframe & Powerplant, Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Kocaeli University)
Tuncer, Safa (Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University)
Kara, Dilan (Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Kocaeli University)
Demirci, Mustafa (Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.10, no.1, 2018 , pp. 50-57 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. To investigate the effect of accelerated aging on surface properties of glazed CAD/CAM resin blocks using a 2D surface profilometer and a 3D non-contact optical profilometer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three types of CAD/CAM resin restorative materials, LAVA Ultimate (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA), VITA Enamic (Vita Zahnfabrik H. Rauter, Bad $S\ddot{a}ckingen$, Germany), and Cerasmart (GC Corparation, Tokyo, Japan) were used for this study. CAD/CAM blocks were cut in 3-mm thickness slabs and divided into three groups; Group 1: control group (specimens polished with 600 grit SCI paper); Group 2: specimens sandblasted, silanized, and glazed with Optiglaze Color (GC); Group 3: glazed specimens subjected to 5000 thermocycles (n=15). The surface roughness ($R_a$ and $R_z$) was evaluated using a profilometer and a 3D scanning instrument. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post- hoc test (P<.05). RESULTS. LAVA, VITA, and Cerasmart exhibited statistically similar $R_a$ and $R_z$ values for each group (P>.05). For VITA and Cerasmart, the specimens in Group 1 exhibited significantly higher $R_a$ values than Group 2 (P<.05). Group 1 ($0.502R_a$), Group 2 ($0.384R_a$), and Group 3 ($0.431R_a$) exhibited statistically similar $R_a$ values for LAVA (P=.062). After 5000 thermocycles, surface roughness values did not change significantly for glazed LAVA, VITA, and Cerasmart (P>.05). CONCLUSION. Glaze material Optiglaze Color makes CAD/CAM resin surfaces smooth and glazed CAD/CAM surfaces seem resistant to deterioration under 5000 thermocycles.
Keywords
CAD/CAM restoratives; Sandblasting; Optiglaze color; Surface roughness;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Perez Cdos R, Hirata RJ, da Silva AH, Sampaio EM, de Miranda MS. Effect of a glaze/composite sealant on the 3-D surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 2009;34:674-80.   DOI
2 Al-Wahadni A. An in vitro investigation into the surface roughness of 2 glazed, unglazed, and refinished ceramic materials. Quintessence Int 2006;37:311-7.
3 Cilli R, de Mattos MC, Honorio HM, Rios D, de Araujo PA, Prakki A. The role of surface sealants in the roughness of composites after a simulated toothbrushing test. J Dent 2009; 37:970-7.   DOI
4 Dede DO, Sahin O, Koroglu A, Yilmaz B. Effect of sealant agents on the color stability and surface roughness of nanohybrid composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:119-28.   DOI
5 Sahin O, Dede DO, Koroglu A, Yilmaz B. Influence of surface sealant agents on the surface roughness and color stability of artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:130-7.   DOI
6 Flury S, Diebold E, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A. Effect of artificial toothbrushing and water storage on the surface roughness and micromechanical properties of tooth-colored CAD-CAM materials. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:767-74.   DOI
7 Tuncer S, Demirci M, Tiryaki M, Unlu N, Uysal O. The effect of a modeling resin and thermocycling on the surface hardness, roughness, and color of different resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013;25:404-19.   DOI
8 Hahnel S, Henrich A, Burgers R, Handel G, Rosentritt M. Investigation of mechanical properties of modern dental composites after artificial aging for one year. Oper Dent 2010;35:412-9.   DOI
9 Nguyen JF, Migonney V, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. Resin composite blocks via high-pressure high-temperature polymerization. Dent Mater 2012;28:529-34.   DOI
10 Bottino MC, Valandro LF, Kantorski KZ, Bressiani JC, Bottino MA. Polishing methods of an alumina-reinforced feldspar ceramic. Braz Dent J 2006;17:285-9.   DOI
11 Duret F, Preston JD. CAD/CAM imaging in dentistry. Curr Opin Dent 1991;1:150-4.
12 van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12.   DOI
13 Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:389-404.   DOI
14 Blatz MB. Long-term clinical success of all-ceramic posterior restorations. Quintessence Int 2002;33:415-26.
15 Mainjot AK, Dupont NM, Oudkerk JC, Dewael TY, Sadoun MJ. From artisanal to CAD-CAM blocks: State of the art of indirect composites. J Dent Res 2016;95:487-95.   DOI
16 Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 2014;93:1232-4.   DOI
17 Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater 2013; 29:419-26.   DOI
18 Kawai K, Urano M, Ebisu S. Effect of surface roughness of porcelain on adhesion of bacteria and their synthesizing glucans. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:664-7.   DOI
19 Yilmaz C, Korkmaz T, Demirkoprulu H, Ergun G, Ozkan Y. Color stability of glazed and polished dental porcelains. J Prosthodont 2008;17:20-4.
20 Weitman RT, Eames WB. Plaque accumulation on composite surfaces after various finising procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1975;91:101-6.   DOI
21 Jones CS, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations. Br Dent J 2004;196:42-5.   DOI
22 Ikeda M, Matin K, Nikaido T, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of surface characteristics on adherence of S. mutans biofilms to indirect resin composites. Dent Mater J 2007;26:915-23.   DOI
23 de Jager N, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. The influence of surface roughness on porcelain strength. Dent Mater 2000;16: 381-8.   DOI
24 Fischer H, Schafer M, Marx R. Effect of surface roughness on flexural strength of veneer ceramics. J Dent Res 2003;82: 972-5.   DOI
25 Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Vermost B, Chow B. Strengthening of porcelain by ion exchange subsequent to thermal tempering. Dent Mater 1992;8:149-52.   DOI
26 Anusavice KJ, Kakar K, Ferree N. Which mechanical and physical testing methods are relevant for predicting the clinical performance of ceramic-based dental prostheses? Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:218-31.   DOI
27 Flury S, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A. Influence of surface roughness on mechanical properties of two computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic materials. Oper Dent 2012;37:617-24.   DOI
28 Jefferies SR. Abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry: a state-of-the-art review. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51:379-97.   DOI
29 Antonson SA, Yazici AR, Kilinc E, Antonson DE, Hardigan PC. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent 2011;39:e9-17.   DOI
30 Tekce N, Pala K, Tuncer S, Demirci M. The effect of surface sealant application and accelerated aging on posterior restorative surfaces: An SEM and AFM study. Dent Mater J 2017; 36:182-9.   DOI
31 Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Effect of chemical structure on degree of conversion in light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials 2002;23:1819-29.   DOI
32 Sideridou ID, Karabela MM. Sorption of water, ethanol or ethanol/water solutions by light-cured dental dimethacrylate resins. Dent Mater 2011;27:1003-10.   DOI
33 Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Irie M, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B. Sandblasting may damage the surface of composite CAD-CAM blocks. Dent Mater 2017; 33:e124-e135.   DOI