Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.6.447

Effects of Hybrid Coat on shear bond strength of five cements: an in-vitro study  

Guo, Yue (Department of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University)
Zhou, Hou-De (Department of Metabolism & Endocrinology, National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Disease, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University)
Feng, Yun-Zhi (Department of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.9, no.6, 2017 , pp. 447-452 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. To evaluate the sealing performance of Hybrid Coat and its influence on the shear bond strength of five dentin surface cements. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Six premolars were pretreated to expose the dentin surface prior to the application of Hybrid Coat. The microscopic characteristics of the dentinal surfaces were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Then, 40 premolars were sectioned longitudinally, and 80 semi-sections were divided into a control group (untreated) and a study group (treated by Hybrid Coat). Alloy restoration was bonded to the teeth specimen using five different cements. Shear bond strength was measured by the universal testing machine. The fracture patterns and the adhesive interface were observed using a stereomicroscope. RESULTS. SEM revealed that the lumens of dentinal tubules were completely occluded by Hybrid Coat. The Hybrid Coat significantly improved the shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and resin cement (RC) but weakened the performance of zinc phosphate cement (ZPC), zinc polycarboxylate cement (ZPCC) and glass ionomer cement (GIC). CONCLUSION. Hybrid Coat is an effective dentinal tubule sealant, and therefore its combined use with resin or resin-modified glass ionomer cements can be applied for the prostheses attachment purpose.
Keywords
Hybrid Coat; Cement; Shear Bond Strength;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A, Flury S. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents. Oper Dent 2011;36:266-73.   DOI
2 Swift EJ Jr, Wilder AD Jr, May KN Jr, Waddell SL. Shear bond strengths of one-bottle dentin adhesives using multiple applications. Oper Dent 1997;22:194-9.
3 Yilmaz Y, Dalmis A, Gurbuz T, Simsek S. Retentive force and microleakage of stainless steel crowns cemented with three different luting agents. Dent Mater J 2004;23:577-84.   DOI
4 Atsuta M, Abell AK, Turner DT, Nakabayashi N, Takeyama M. A new coupling agent for composite materials: 4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitic anhydride. J Biomed Mater Res 1982;16:619-28.   DOI
5 Mantzourani M, Sharma D. Dentine sensitivity: past, present and future. J Dent 2013;41:S3-17.
6 Farias D, Walter R, Swift EJ Jr. Critic appraisal. Postoperative sensitivity with indirect restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:208-13.   DOI
7 Thanatvarakorn O, Nakashima S, Sadr A, Prasansuttiporn T, Thitthaweerat S, Tagami J. Effect of a calcium-phosphate based desensitizer on dentin surface characteristics. Dent Mater J 2013;32:615-21.   DOI
8 Han L, Okiji T. Dentin tubule occluding ability of dentin desensitizers. Am J Dent 2015;28:90-4.
9 Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan TE. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:511-9.   DOI
10 Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17:144-54.
11 Carvalho AO, Oliveira MT, Nikaido T, Tagami J, Giannini M. Effect of adhesive system and application strategy on reduction of dentin permeability. Braz Oral Res 2012;26:397-403.   DOI
12 Yim NH, Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Gardner FM, Pashley DH. Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparations. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:459-65.   DOI
13 Cummins D. Dentin hypersensitivity: from diagnosis to a breakthrough therapy for everyday sensitivity relief. J Clin Dent 2009;20:1-9.
14 Reis A, Loguercio AD, Manso AP, Grande RH, Schiltz-Taing M, Suh B, Chen L, Carvalho RM. Microtensile bond strengths for six 2-step and two 1-step self-etch adhesive systems to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2013;26:44-50.
15 Wolfart S, Linnemann J, Kern M. Crown retention with use of different sealing systems on prepared dentine. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:1053-61.   DOI
16 Violich DR, Chandler NP. The smear layer in endodontics - a review. Int Endod J 2010;43:2-15.   DOI
17 Tani C, Finger WJ. Effect of smear layer thickness on bond strength mediated by three all-in-one self-etching priming adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2002;4:283-9.
18 Faus-Matoses I, Sola-Ruiz F. Dental preparation with sonic vs high-speed finishing: analysis of microleakage in bonded veneer restorations. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:29-34.
19 Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982;16:265-73.   DOI
20 Oliveira SS, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabe LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr. The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system. Dent Mater 2003;19:758-67.   DOI
21 Nikaido T, Nakaoki Y, Ogata M, Foxton R, Tagami J. The resin-coating technique. Effect of a single-step bonding system on dentin bond strengths. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:293-300.
22 Takahashi R, Nikaido T, Ariyoshi M, Kitayama S, Sadr A, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Thin resin coating by dual-application of all-in-one adhesives improves dentin bond strength of resin cements for indirect restorations. Dent Mater J 2010;29:615-22.   DOI
23 Aggarwal M, Foley TF, Rix D. A comparison of shear-peel band strengths of 5 orthodontic cements. Angle Orthod 2000;70:308-16.
24 Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:265-73.   DOI