Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.265

Evaluation of internal fit of interim crown fabricated with CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing system  

Lee, Wan-Sun (Advanced Dental Device Development Institute (A3DI), Kyungpook National University)
Lee, Du-Hyeong (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Lee, Kyu-Bok (Advanced Dental Device Development Institute (A3DI), Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.9, no.4, 2017 , pp. 265-270 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. This study is to evaluate the internal fit of the crown manufactured by CAD/CAM milling method and 3D printing method. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The master model was fabricated with stainless steel by using CNC machine and the work model was created from the vinyl-polysiloxane impression. After scanning the working model, the design software is used to design the crown. The saved STL file is used on the CAD/CAM milling method and two types of 3D printing method to produce 10 interim crowns per group. Internal discrepancy measurement uses the silicon replica method and the measured data are analyzed with One-way ANOVA to verify the statistic significance. RESULTS. The discrepancy means (standard deviation) of the 3 groups are $171.6\;(97.4){\mu}m$ for the crown manufactured by the milling system and 149.1 (65.9) and $91.1\;(36.4){\mu}m$, respectively, for the crowns manufactured with the two types of 3D printing system. There was a statistically significant difference and the 3D printing system group showed more outstanding value than the milling system group. CONCLUSION. The marginal and internal fit of the interim restoration has more outstanding 3D printing method than the CAD/CAM milling method. Therefore, the 3D printing method is considered as applicable for not only the interim restoration production, but also in the dental prosthesis production with a higher level of completion.
Keywords
CAD/CAM milling system; 3D printing system; Interim crown; Fitness;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Balkenhol M, Knapp M, Ferger P, Heun U, Wostmann B. Correlation between polymerization shrinkage and marginal fit of temporary crowns. Dent Mater 2008;24:1575-84.   DOI
2 Ehrenberg D, Weiner GI, Weiner S. Long-term effects of storage and thermal cycling on the marginal adaptation of provisional resin crowns: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:230-6.   DOI
3 Ehrenberg DS, Weiner S. Changes in marginal gap size of provisional resin crowns after occlusal loading and thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:139-48.   DOI
4 Oxman JD, Anderson SE. Dental crown liner composition and methods of preparing provisional applications. U.S. Patent No 5,709,548, 1998.
5 Abouelatta OB, El-Bediwi A, Sakrana A, Jiang XQ, Blunt L. Surface integrity of provisional resin materials. Meas Sci Technol 2006;17:584-91.   DOI
6 Nejatidanesh F, Lotfi HR, Savabi O. Marginal accuracy of interim restorations fabricated from four interim autopolymerizing resins. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:364-7.   DOI
7 Michalakis K, Pissiotis A, Hirayama H, Kang K, Kafantaris N. Comparison of temperature increase in the pulp chamber during the polymerization of materials used for the direct fabrication of provisional restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:418-23.   DOI
8 Heying JJ, Gratton DG. Flexural strength of interim fixed prosthesis materials after simulated function. MS Thesis, University of Iowa, 2009.
9 Regish KM, Sharma D, Prithviraj DR. Techniques of fabrication of provisional restoration: An overview. Int J Dent 2011;2011:134659.
10 Alharbi N, Osman R, Wismeijer D. Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:760-7.   DOI
11 Syed M, Chopra R, Sachdev V. Allergic reactions to dental materials-a systematic review. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:ZE04-9.
12 Torabi K, Farjood E, Hamedani S. Rapid prototyping technologies and their applications in prosthodontics, a review of literature. J Dent (Shiraz) 2015;16:1-9.
13 Frazier WE. Metal additive manufacturing: A review. J Mater Eng Perform 2014;23:1917-28.   DOI
14 Stopp S, Wolff T, Irlinger F, Lueth T. A new method for printer calibration and contour accuracy manufacturing with 3D-print technology. Rapid Prototyp J 2008;14:167-72.   DOI
15 Sun J, Zhang FQ. The application of rapid prototyping in prosthodontics. J Prosthodont 2012;21:641-4.   DOI
16 Kelvin Khng KY, Ettinger RL, Armstrong SR, Lindquist T, Gratton DG, Qian F. In vitro evaluation of the marginal integrity of CAD/CAM interim crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:617-23.   DOI
17 Pimenta MA, Frasca LC, Lopes R, Rivaldo E. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic and metallic crown copings using x-ray microtomography (micro-CT) technology. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:223-8.   DOI
18 Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:18-24.   DOI
19 Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:201-6.   DOI
20 Grenade C, Mainjot A, Vanheusden A. Fit of single tooth zirconia copings: comparison between various manufacturing processes. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:249-55.   DOI
21 Ostlund LE. Cavity design and mathematics: their effect on gaps at the margins of cast restorations. Oper Dent 1985;10:122-37.
22 McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-11.   DOI
23 Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kastner K, Walter MH. Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:419-24.   DOI
24 Liu Q, Leu M, Schmitt S. Rapid prototyping in dentistry: technology and application. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2006;29:317-35.   DOI