Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.4.275

Microtensile bond strength and micromorphologic analysis of surface-treated resin nanoceramics  

Park, Joon-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Choi, Yu-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.8, no.4, 2016 , pp. 275-284 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatment methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin cement to resin nanoceramic (RNC). MATERIALS AND METHODS. RNC onlays (Lava Ultimate) (n=30) were treated using air abrasion with and without a universal adhesive, or HF etching followed by a universal adhesive with and without a silane coupling agent, or tribological silica coating with and without a universal adhesive, and divided into 6 groups. Onlays were luted with resin cement to dentin surfaces. A microtensile bond strength test was performed and evaluated by one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test (${\alpha}$=.05). A nanoscratch test, field emission scanning electron microscopy, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy were used for micromorphologic analysis (${\alpha}$=.05). The roughness and elemental proportion were evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS. Tribological silica coating showed the highest roughness, followed by air abrasion and HF etching. After HF etching, the RNC surface presented a decrease in oxygen, silicon, and zirconium ratio with increasing carbon ratio. Air abrasion with universal adhesive showed the highest bond strength followed by tribological silica coating with universal adhesive. HF etching with universal adhesive showed the lowest bond strength. CONCLUSION. An improved understanding of the effect of surface treatment of RNC could enhance the durability of resin bonding when used for indirect restorations. When using RNC for restoration, effective and systemic surface roughening methods and an appropriate adhesive are required.
Keywords
Ceramics; Computer-Aided Design-Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD-CAM); Morphologic analysis; Surface treatment; Tensile bond strength;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Stawarczyk B, Krawczuk A, Ilie N. Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:299-308.   DOI
2 D’Arcangelo C, Vanini L. Effect of three surface treatments on the adhesive properties of indirect composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:319-26.
3 Behr M, Proff P, Kolbeck C, Langrieger S, Kunze J, Handel G, Rosentritt M. The bond strength of the resin-to-zirconia interface using different bonding concepts. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2011;4:2-8.   DOI
4 Lebon N, Tapie L, Vennat E, Mawussi B. Influence of CAD/CAM tool and material on tool wear and roughness of dental prostheses after milling. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:236-47.   DOI
5 Alt V, Hannig M, WOstmann B, Balkenhol M. Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations. Dent Mater 2011;27:339-47.   DOI
6 Schoenbaum TR. Dentistry in the digital age: an update. Dent Today 2012;31:108, 110, 112-3.
7 Poticny DJ, Klim J. CAD/CAM in-office technology: innovations after 25 years for predictable, esthetic outcomes. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:5S-9S.   DOI
8 Stawarczyk B, Sener B, Trottmann A, Roos M, Ozcan M, Hammerle CH. Discoloration of manually fabricated resins and industrially fabricated CAD/CAM blocks versus glassceramic: effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing. Dent Mater J 2012;31:377-83.   DOI
9 Stawarczyk B, Ender A, Trottmann A, Ozcan M, Fischer J, Hämmerle CH. Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: effect of aging regimens. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1669-77.   DOI
10 Tinschert J, Zwez D, Marx R, Anusavice KJ. Structural reliability of alumina-, feldspar-, leucite-, mica- and zirconiabased ceramics. J Dent 2000;28:529-35.   DOI
11 Stawarczyk B, Ozcan M, Trottmann A, Schmutz F, Roos M, Hammerle C. Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:325-32.   DOI
12 El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Mohsen MM, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks. Dent Mater 2003;19:575-83.   DOI
13 Luthardt RG, Holzhüter MS, Rudolph H, Herold V, Walter MH. CAD/CAM-machining effects on Y-TZP zirconia. Dent Mater 2004;20:655-62.   DOI
14 Lin WS, Ercoli C, Feng C, Morton D. The effect of core material, veneering porcelain, and fabrication technique on the biaxial flexural strength and weibull analysis of selected dental ceramics. J Prosthodont 2012;21:353-62.   DOI
15 Addison O, Cao X, Sunnar P, Fleming GJ. Machining variability impacts on the strength of a CAD-CAM ceramic. Dent Mater 2012;28:880-7.   DOI
16 Vargas MA, Bergeron C, Diaz-Arnold A. Cementing all-ceramic restorations: recommendations for success. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:20S-4S.   DOI
17 3M ESPE. Lava ultimate technical product profile: 2011. Available at: http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/781394O/lava-ultimate-technical-product-profile golbal.pdf
18 Chen C, Trindade FZ, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. The fracture resistance of a CAD/CAM Resin Nano Ceramic (RNC) and a CAD ceramic at different thicknesses. Dent Mater 2014;30:954-62.   DOI
19 Joda T, Huber S, Bürki A, Zysset P, Bragger U. Influence of Abutment Design on Stiffness, Strength, and Failure of Implant-Supported Monolithic Resin Nano Ceramic (RNC) Crowns. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:1200-7.   DOI
20 Spitznagel FA, Horvath SD, Guess PC, Blatz MB. Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: a review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:382-93.   DOI
21 el-Mowafy O. The use of resin cements in restorative dentistry to overcome retention problems. J Can Dent Assoc 2001;67:97-102.
22 Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:268-74.   DOI
23 Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Avera SP. Porcelain-composite interface microleakage with various porcelain surface treatments. Dent Mater 1991;7:118-23.   DOI
24 Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR, Smith R. Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now? Dent Mater 2011;27:71-82.   DOI
25 Semmelman JO, Kulp PR. Silane bonding porcelain teeth to acrylic. J Am Dent Assoc 1968;76:69-73.   DOI
26 Jochen DG, Caputo AA. Composite resin repair of porcelain denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:673-9.   DOI
27 Ferrando JM, Graser GN, Tallents RH, Jarvis RH. Tensile strength and microleakage of porcelain repair materials. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:44-50.   DOI
28 Ozcan M. Evaluation of alternative intra-oral repair techniques for fractured ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:194-203.   DOI
29 Amaral R, Ozcan M, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconiareinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning. Dent Mater 2006;22:283-90.   DOI
30 Ozcan M. The use of chairside silica coating for different dental applications: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:469-72.   DOI
31 Bailey LF, Bennett RJ. DICOR surface treatments for enhanced bonding. J Dent Res 1988;67:925-31.   DOI
32 Egilmez F, Ergun G, Cekic-Nagas I, Vallittu PK, Ozcan M, Lassila LV. Effect of surface modification on the bond strength between zirconia and resin cement. J Prosthodont 2013;22:529-36.   DOI
33 Papia E, Larsson C, du Toit M, Vult von Steyern P. Bonding between oxide ceramics and adhesive cement systems: a systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2014;102:395-413.   DOI
34 Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of different etching periods on the bond strength of a composite resin to a machinable porcelain. J Dent 1998;26:53-8.   DOI
35 Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etchant, etching period, and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent 1998;23:250-7.
36 Szep S, Gerhardt T, Gockel HW, Ruppel M, Metzeltin D, Heidemann D. In vitro dentinal surface reaction of 9.5% buffered hydrofluoric acid in repair of ceramic restorations: a scanning electron microscopic investigation. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:668-74.   DOI
37 Braga RR, Meira JB, Boaro LC, Xavier TA. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of "macro" test methods. Dent Mater 2010;26:e38-49.
38 Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review. Dent Mater 2010;26:e78-93.
39 Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 1994;10:236-40.   DOI
40 Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay F. The microtensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:299-309.
41 Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ, Torres TJ, Avera SP. Shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:17-23.
42 Swift EJ Jr, Brodeur C, Cvitko E, Pires JA. Treatment of composite surfaces for indirect bonding. Dent Mater 1992;8:193-6.   DOI
43 Blatz MB, Phark JH, Ozer F, Mante FK, Saleh N, Bergler M, Sadan A. In vitro comparative bond strength of contemporary self-adhesive resin cements to zirconium oxide ceramic with and without air-particle abrasion. Clin Oral Investig 2010;14:187-92.   DOI
44 Soares CJ, Soares PV, Pereira JC, Fonseca RB. Surface treatment protocols in the cementation process of ceramic and laboratory-processed composite restorations: a literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17:224-35.   DOI
45 Borges GA, Sophr AM, de Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Chan DC. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:479-88.   DOI
46 Kern M, Thompson VP. Sandblasting and silica coating of a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic: volume loss, morphology, and changes in the surface composition. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:453-61.   DOI
47 Hantsche H. Comparison of basic principles of the surfacespecific analytical methods: AES/SAM, ESCA (XPS), SIMS, and ISS with X-ray microanalysis, and some applications in research and industry. Scanning 1989;11:257-80.   DOI
48 Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 1995;11:117-25.   DOI
49 Imamura GM, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB, Swift EJ Jr. Enhancement of resin bonding to heat-cured composite resin. Oper Dent 1996;21:249-56.
50 Janda R, Roulet JF, Wulf M, Tiller HJ. A new adhesive technology for all-ceramics. Dent Mater 2003;19:567-73.   DOI