Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.3.201

Comparative study of the radiopacity of resin cements used in aesthetic dentistry  

Montes-Fariza, Raquel (Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Catholic University of Valencia)
Monterde-Hernandez, Manuel (Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Catholic University of Valencia)
Cabanillas-Casabella, Cristina (Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Catholic University of Valencia)
Pallares-Sabater, Antonio (Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Catholic University of Valencia)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.8, no.3, 2016 , pp. 201-206 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to compare the radiopacity of 6 modern resin cements with that of human enamel and dentine using the Digora digital radiography system, to verify whether they meet the requirements of ANSI/ADA specification no. 27/1993 and the ISO 4049/2000 standard and assess whether their radiopacity is influenced by the thickness of the cement employed. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three 3-thickness samples (0.5, 1 and 1.5 mm) were fabricated for each material. The individual cement samples were radiographed on the CCD sensor next to the aluminium wedge and the tooth samples. Five radiographs were made of each sample and therefore five readings of radiographic density were taken for each thickness of the materials. The radiopacity was measured in pixels using Digora 2.6 software. The calibration curve obtained from the mean values of each step of the wedge made it possible to obtain the equivalent in mm of aluminium for each mm of the luting material. RESULTS. With the exception of Variolink Veneer Medium Value 0, all the cements studied were more radiopaque than enamel and dentin (P<.05) and complied with the ISO and ANSI/ADA requirements (P<.001). The radiopacity of all the cements examined depended on their thickness: the thicker the material, the greater its radiopacity. CONCLUSION. All materials except Variolink Veneer Medium Value 0 yielded radiopacity values that complied with the recommendations of the ISO and ANSI/ADA. Variolink Veneer Medium Value 0 showed less radiopacity than enamel and dentin.
Keywords
Radiopacity; Resin cement; Luting cement;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ladha K, Verma M. Conventional and contemporary luting cements: an overview. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2010;10:79-88.   DOI
2 Fernandes LO, Cassimiro-Silva PF, Massa ME, Pedrosa RF, Cardoso SMO. Radiopacity of resin cements: in vitro study. Rev Gaucha Odontol 2012;60:169-77.
3 Reis JM, Jorge EG, Ribeiro JG, Pinelli LA, Abi-Rached Fde O, Tanomaru-Filho M. Radiopacity evaluation of contemporary luting cements by digitization of images. ISRN Dent 2012;2012:704246.
4 Tsuge T. Radiopacity of conventional, resin-modified glass ionomer, and resin-based luting materials. J Oral Sci 2009;51:223-30.   DOI
5 Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:280-301.   DOI
6 Altintas SH, Yildirim T, Kayipmaz S, Usumez A. Evaluation of the radiopacity of luting cements by digital radiography. J Prosthodont 2013;22:282-6.   DOI
7 Dukic W, Delija B, Derossi D, Dadic I. Radiopacity of composite dental materials using a digital X-ray system. Dent Mater J 2012;31:47-53.   DOI
8 Gurdal P, Akdeniz BG. Comparison of two methods for radiometric evaluation of resin-based restorative materials. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:236-9.   DOI
9 Pekkan G, Ozcan M. Radiopacity of different resin-based and conventional luting cements compared to human and bovine teeth. Dent Mater J 2012;31:68-75.   DOI
10 Pedrosa RF, Brasileiro IV, dos Anjos Pontual ML, dos Anjos Pontual A, da Silveira MM. Influence of materials radiopacity in the radiographic diagnosis of secondary caries: evaluation in film and two digital systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:344-50.   DOI
11 Salzedas LM, Louzada MJ, de Oliveira Filho AB. Radiopacity of restorative materials using digital images. J Appl Oral Sci 2006;14:147-52.   DOI
12 Fonseca RB, Branco CA, Soares PV, Correr-Sobrinho L, Haiter-Neto F, Fernandes-Neto AJ, Soares CJ. Radiodensity of base, liner and luting dental materials. Clin Oral Investig 2006;10:114-8.   DOI
13 Fraga RC, Luca-Fraga LR, Pimenta LA. Physical properties of resinous cements: an in vitro study. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:1064-7.   DOI
14 Manso AP, Silva NR, Bonfante EA, Pegoraro TA, Dias RA, Carvalho RM. Cements and adhesives for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Clin North Am 2011;55:311-32.   DOI
15 Hill EE. Dental cements for definitive luting: a review and practical clinical considerations. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51:643-58.   DOI
16 Pegoraro TA, da Silva NR, Carvalho RM. Cements for use in esthetic dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51:453-71.   DOI
17 Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Mechanical and physical properties of contemporary dental luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:127-34.   DOI
18 el-Mowafy O. The use of resin cements in restorative dentistry to overcome retention problems. J Can Dent Assoc 2001;67:97-102.
19 Van Dijken JW, Wing K.E, Ruyter IE, An evaluation of the radiopacity of composite restorative materials used in class I and class II cavities. Acta Odontol Scand 1989;47:401-7.   DOI
20 Furtos G, Baldea B, Silaghi-Dumitrescu L, Moldovan M, Prejmerean C, Nica L. Influence of inorganic filler content on the radiopacity of dental resin cements. Dent Mater J 2012;31:266-72.   DOI
21 American National Standard/American Dental Association. Proposed ANSI/ADA Specification 27, Dentistry - Polymer-based filling. Restorative and Luting Materials, July 2005. Chicago: ADA.
22 ISO standard 4049. Dentistry-polymer-based filling, restorative and luting materials. International Organization for Standardization; Geneva; Switzerland 2000. p. 1-27.
23 Gu S, Rasimick BJ, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. Radiopacity of dental materials using a digital X-ray system. Dent Mater 2006;22:765-70.   DOI