Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.1.37

Effect of the amount of thickness reduction on color and translucency of dental monolithic zirconia ceramics  

Kim, Hee-Kyung (Comprehensive Treatment Center, Seoul National University Dental Hospital)
Kim, Sung-Hun (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Lee, Jai-Bong (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Han, Jung-Suk (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Yeo, In-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Ha, Seung-Ryong (Department of Dentistry, Ajou University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.8, no.1, 2016 , pp. 37-42 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. This study investigated the effect of amount of thickness reduction on color and translucency of dental monolithic zirconia ceramics. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One-hundred sixty-five monolithic zirconia specimens ($16.3mm{\times}16.3mm{\times}2.0mm$) were divided into 5 groups (Group I to V) according to the number of A2-coloring liquid applications. Each group was then divided into 11 subgroups by reducing the thickness up to 1.0 mm in 0.1-mm increments (Subgroup 0 to 10, n=3). Colors and spectral distributions were measured according to CIELAB on a reflection spectrophotometer. All measurements were performed on five different areas of each specimen. Color difference (${\Delta}E^*{^_{ab}}$) and translucency parameter (TP) were calculated. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and multiple comparison $Scheff{\acute{e}}$ test (${\alpha}=.05$). RESULTS. There were significant differences in CIE $L^*$ between Subgroup 0 and other subgroups in all groups. CIE $a^*$ increased (0.52<$R^2$<0.73), while CIE $b^*$ decreased (0.00<$R^2$<0.74) in all groups with increasing thickness reduction. Perceptible color differences (${\Delta}E^*{^_{ab}}$>3.7) were obtained between Subgroup 0 and other subgroups. TP values generally increased as the thickness reduction increased in all groups ($R^2$>0.89, P<.001). CONCLUSION. Increasing thickness reduction reduces lightness and increases a reddish, bluish appearance, and translucency of monolithic zirconia ceramics.
Keywords
Y-TZP ceramic; Color; Dental Prosthesis Coloring;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 McLean JW, Odont D. Evolution of dental ceramics in the twentieth century. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:61-6.   DOI
2 Douglas RD, Przybylska M. Predicting porcelain thickness required for dental shade matches. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:143-9.   DOI
3 Isgro G, Pallav P, van der Zel JM, Feilzer AJ. The influence of the veneering porcelain and different surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength of a heat-pressed ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:465-73.   DOI
4 Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Augthun M, Spiekermann H. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: A laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:231-8.
5 Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M. Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:641-52.
6 Ha SR, Kim SH, Han JS, Yoo SH, Jeong SC, Lee JB, Yeo IS. The influence of various core designs on stress distribution in the veneered zirconia crown: a finite element study. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:187-97.   DOI
7 Kim HK, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS, Yeo IS. Effect of polishing and glazing on the color and spectral distribution of monolithic zirconia. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:296-304.   DOI
8 de Azevedo Cubas G B, Camacho G B, Demarco FF, Pereira-Cenci T. The effect of luting agents and ceramic thickness on the color variation of different ceramics against a chromatic background. Eur J Dent 2011;5:245-52.
9 Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Influence of ceramic and cement thickness on the masking of various types of opaque posts. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:412-7.   DOI
10 Shokry TE, Shen CS, Elhosary MM, Elkhodary AM. Effect of core and veneer thicknesses on the color parameters of two all-ceramic systems. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:124-9.   DOI
11 Dozic A, Kleverlaan CJ, Meegdes M, van der Zel J, Feilzer AJ. The influence of porcelain layer thickness on the final shade of ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:563-70.   DOI
12 Terada Y, Maeyama S, Hirayasu R. The influence of different thicknesses of dentin porcelain on the color reflected from thin opaque porcelain fused to metal. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2:352-6.
13 Ozturk O, Uludag B, Usumez A, Sahin V, Celik G. The effect of ceramic thickness and number of firings on the color of two all-ceramic systems. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:99-106.   DOI
14 Antonson SA, Anusavice KJ. Contrast ratio of veneering and core ceramics as a function of thickness. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:316-20.
15 Lund PS, Aquilino SA, Dixon DL. Evaluation of the color and appearance of a new textured opaque porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:548-54.
16 Kim HK, Kim SH. Effect of the number of coloring liquid applications on the optical properties of monolithic zirconia. Dent Mater 2014;30:e229-37.   DOI
17 Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE). Colorimetry, CIE 015. 3rd ed. Vienna: CIE Central Bureau; 2004.
18 Johnston WM, Ma T, Kienle BH. Translucency parameter of colorants for maxillofacial prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:79-86.
19 Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 68;5:819-22.   DOI
20 Jorgenson MW, Goodkind RJ. Spectrophotometric study of five porcelain shades relative to the dimensions of color, porcelain thickness, and repeated firings. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 42:96-105.   DOI
21 Jacobs SH, Goodacre CJ, Moore BK, Dykema RW. Effect of porcelain thickness and type of metal-ceramic alloy on color. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:138-45.   DOI
22 Judd DB, Wyszecki G. Color in business, science and industry. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1975. p. 397-417.
23 Douglas RD, Brewer JD. Acceptability of shade differences in metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:254-60.   DOI
24 Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: Core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88:4-9.
25 Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II: Core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:10-5.
26 O'Keefe KL, Pease PL, Herrin HK. Variables affecting the spectral transmittance of light through porcelain veneer samples. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:434-8.   DOI
27 Nassau K. The physics and chemistry of color. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2001. p. 231-6, 390.
28 Kingery WD, Bowen HK, Uhlmann DR. Introduction to ceramic. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1976. p. 668.