Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.3.214

The effect of various sandblasting conditions on surface changes of dental zirconia and shear bond strength between zirconia core and indirect composite resin  

Su, Naichuan (State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University)
Yue, Li (Department of Dental Technology, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University)
Liao, Yunmao (State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University)
Liu, Wenjia (State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University)
Zhang, Hai (Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Washington)
Li, Xin (Department of Stomatology, Mianyang Central Hospital)
Wang, Hang (State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University)
Shen, Jiefei (State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.7, no.3, 2015 , pp. 214-223 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. To measure the surface loss of dental restorative zirconia and the short-term bond strength between an indirect composite resin (ICR) and zirconia ceramic after various sandblasting processes. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three hundred zirconia bars were randomly divided into 25 groups according to the type of sandblasting performed with pressures of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 MPa, sandblasting times of 7, 14 and 21 seconds, and alumina powder sizes of 50 and $110{\mu}m$. The control group did not receive sandblasting. The volume loss and height loss on zirconia surface after sandblasting and the shear bond strength (SBS) between the sandblasted zirconia and ICR after 24-h immersion were measured for each group using multivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Least Significance Difference (LSD) test (${\alpha}$=.05). After sandblasting, the failure modes of the ICR/zirconia surfaces were observed using scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS. The volume loss and height loss were increased with higher sandblasting pressure and longer sandblasting treatment, but they decreased with larger powder size. SBS was significantly increased by increasing the sandblasting time from 7 seconds to 14 seconds and from 14 seconds to 21 seconds, as well as increasing the size of alumina powder from $50{\mu}m$ to $110{\mu}m$. SBS was significantly increased from 0.1 MPa to 0.2 MPa according to the size of alumina powder. However, the SBSs were not significantly different with the sandblasting pressure of 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 MPa. The possibilities of the combination of both adhesive failure and cohesive failure within the ICR were higher with the increases in bonding strength. CONCLUSION. Based on the findings of this study, sandblasting with alumina particles at 0.2 MPa, 21 seconds and the powder size of $110{\mu}m$ is recommended for dental applications to improve the bonding between zirconia core and ICR.
Keywords
All-ceramic; Bond strength; Indirect composite; Sandblasting; Zirconia;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kirmali O, Barutcugil C, Harorli O, Kapdan A, Er K. Resin cement to indirect composite resin bonding: Effect of various surface treatments. Scanning 2015;37:89-94.   DOI
2 Leinfelder KF. Indirect posterior composite resins. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005;26:495-503.
3 Takahashi Y, Hisama K, Sato H, Chai J, Shimizu H, Kido H, Ukon S. Probability of failure of highly filled indirect resinveneered implant-supported restorations: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:179-82.
4 Nandini S. Indirect resin composites. J Conserv Dent 2010;13:184-94.   DOI
5 Ereifej N, Silikas N, Watts DC. Edge strength of indirect restorative materials. J Dent 2009;37:799-806.   DOI
6 Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R. Brittleness index of machinable dental materials and its relation to the marginal chipping factor. J Dent 2007;35:897-902.   DOI
7 Ciftci Y, Canay S. The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:571-82.
8 Kobayashi K, Komine F, Blatz MB, Saito A, Koizumi H, Matsumura H. Influence of priming agents on the shortterm bond strength of an indirect composite veneering material to zirconium dioxide ceramic. Quintessence Int 2009;40:545-51.
9 Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:268-74.   DOI
10 Guazzato M, Albakry M, Quach L, Swain MV. Influence of surface and heat treatments on the flexural strength of a glass-infiltrated alumina/zirconia-reinforced dental ceramic. Dent Mater 2005;21:454-63.   DOI
11 Kern M, Barloi A, Yang B. Surface conditioning influences zirconia ceramic bonding. J Dent Res 2009;88:817-22.   DOI
12 Watanabe T, Ino S, Okada S, Katsumata Y, Hamano N, Hojo S, Teranaka T, Toyodo M. Influence of simplified silica coating method on the bonding strength of resin cement to dental alloy. Dent Mater J 2008;27:16-20.   DOI
13 Ban S. Reliability and properties of core materials for all-ceramic dental restorations. Japanese Dent Sci Rev 2008;44:3-21.   DOI
14 Li T, Zhang ZF, Zhou M, Wang H. Research progress on sandblasting technique in the dental ceramic restorations. Int J Stomatol 2010;37:206-9.
15 Craig RG, Powers JM, Wataha JC. Dental materials: properties and manuplation. 8th ed. St. Louis; Mosby; 2004. p. 578-80.
16 Matsumura H, Yanagida H, Tanoue N, Atsuta M, Shimoe S. Shear bond strength of resin composite veneering material to gold alloy with varying metal surface preparations. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:315-9.   DOI
17 Ozkurt Z, Kazazoglu E, Unal A. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of veneering ceramics to zirconia. Dent Mater J 2010;29:138-46.   DOI
18 Uo M, Sjogren G, Sundh A, Goto M, Watari F, Bergman M. Effect of surface condition of dental zirconia ceramic (Denzir) on bonding. Dent Mater J 2006;25:626-31.   DOI
19 Kosmac T, Oblak C, Marion L. The effects of dental grinding and sandblasting on ageing and fatigue behavior of dental zirconia (Y-TZP) ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 2008;28:1085-90.   DOI
20 Dong JK, Luthy H, Wohlwend A, Scharer P. Heat-pressed ceramics: technology and strength. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:9-16.
21 Luangruangrong P, Cook NB, Sabrah AH, Hara AT, Bottino MC. Influence of full-contour zirconia surface roughness on wear of glass-ceramics. J Prosthodont 2014;23:198-205.   DOI
22 Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Effect of sandblasting on the long-term performance of dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;71:381-6.
23 Wang G, Zhang S, Bian C, Kong H. Effect of zirconia surface treatment on zirconia/veneer interfacial toughness evaluated by fracture mechanics method. J Dent 2014;42:808-15.   DOI
24 Liu D, Matinlinna JP, Tsoi JK, Pow EH, Miyazaki T, Shibata Y, Kan CW. A new modified laser pretreatment for porcelain zirconia bonding. Dent Mater 2013;29:559-65.   DOI
25 Karakoca S, Yilmaz H. Influence of surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of Y-TZP ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;91:930-7.
26 Aboushelib MN, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:984-91.   DOI
27 Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered allceramic restorations. Part 3: double veneer technique. J Prosthodont 2008;17:9-13.
28 Kern M, Thompson VP. Sandblasting and silica-coating of dental alloys: volume loss, morphology and changes in the surface composition. Dent Mater 1993;9:151-61.   DOI
29 Kern M, Thompson VP. Sandblasting and silica coating of a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic: volume loss, morphology, and changes in the surface composition. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:453-61.   DOI
30 Boccaccini AR, Winkler V. Fracture surface roughness and toughness of Al2O3-platelet reinforced glass matrix composites. Compos Part A 2002;33:125-31.
31 Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Luthy H, Gauckler LJ, Scharer P, Franz Hammerle CH. Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. Quintessence Int 2006;37:685-93.
32 Nakamura T, Wakabayashi K, Zaima C, Nishida H, Kinuta S, Yatani H. Tensile bond strength between tooth-colored porcelain and sandblasted zirconia framework. J Prosthodont Res 2009;53:116-9.   DOI
33 Fischer J, Stawarczyk B, Tomic M, Strub JR, Hammerle CH. Effect of thermal misfit between different veneering ceramics and zirconia frameworks on in vitro fracture load of single crowns. Dent Mater J 2007;26:766-72.   DOI
34 Choi JE, Waddell JN, Torr B, Swain MV. Pressed ceramics onto zirconia. Part 1: Comparison of crystalline phases present, adhesion to a zirconia system and flexural strength. Dent Mater 2011;27:1204-12.   DOI
35 Lawn BR, Pajares A, Zhang Y, Deng Y, Polack MA, Lloyd IK, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Materials design in the performance of all-ceramic crowns. Biomaterials 2004;25:2885-92.   DOI
36 Lawna BR, Denga Y, Miranda P, Pajares A, Chai H, Kim DK. Overview: Damage in brittle layer structures from concentrated loads. J Mater Res 2002;17:3019-36.   DOI
37 Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Luthy H, Hammerle CH. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:383-8.
38 Scurria MS, Bader JD, Shugars DA. Meta-analysis of fixed partial denture survival: prostheses and abutments. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:459-64.   DOI
39 Kim BK, Bae HE, Shim JS, Lee KW. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:357-62.   DOI
40 Taira Y, Hatono H, Tokita M, Sawase T. Thickness and surface structure of a ceramic layer created on three indirect resin composites with aerosol deposition. J Prosthodont Res 2010;54:168-72.   DOI
41 Ford C, Qasim T, Bush MB, Hu X, Shah MM, Saxena VP, Lawn BR. Margin failures in crown-like brittle structures: offaxis loading. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;85:23-8.
42 Saka M, Yuzugullu B. Bond strength of veneer ceramic and zirconia cores with different surface modifications after microwave sintering. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:485-93.   DOI
43 Kosmac T, Oblak C, Marion L. The effects of dental grinding and sandblasting on ageing and fatigue behavior of dental zirconia (Y-TZP) ceramics. J European Ceram Soc 2008;28:1085-90.   DOI
44 Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Malament KA, Van Thompson P, Rekow ED. Damage accumulation and fatigue life of particle-abraded ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:442-8.
45 Fischer H, Weber M, Marx R. Lifetime prediction of all-ceramic bridges by computational methods. J Dent Res 2003;82:238-42.   DOI
46 de Oyague RC, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio E, Ferrari M, Osorio R. Influence of surface treatments and resin cement selection on bonding to densely-sintered zirconium-oxide ceramic. Dent Mater 2009;25:172-9.   DOI
47 Wolf DM, Powers JM, O'Keefe KL. Bond strength of composite to porcelain treated with new porcelain repair agents. Dent Mater 1992;8:158-61.   DOI
48 Quaas AC, Yang B, Kern M. Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures. Dent Mater 2007;23:506-12.   DOI
49 Komine F, Fushiki R, Koizuka M, Taguchi K, Kamio S, Matsumura H. Effect of surface treatment on bond strength between an indirect composite material and a zirconia framework. J Oral Sci 2012;54:39-46.   DOI