Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.2.122

Accuracy evaluation of metal copings fabricated by computer-aided milling and direct metal laser sintering systems  

Park, Jong-Kyoung (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
Lee, Wan-Sun (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
Kim, Hae-Young (Department of Public Health Science, Graduate School & BK21+ Program in Public Health Science, Korea University)
Kim, Woong-Chul (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
Kim, Ji-Hwan (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.7, no.2, 2015 , pp. 122-128 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. To assess the marginal and internal gaps of the copings fabricated by computer-aided milling and direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) systems in comparison to casting method. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Ten metal copings were fabricated by casting, computer-aided milling, and DMLS. Seven mesiodistal and labiolingual positions were then measured, and each of these were divided into the categories; marginal gap (MG), cervical gap (CG), axial wall at internal gap (AG), and incisal edge at internal gap (IG). Evaluation was performed by a silicone replica technique. A digital microscope was used for measurement of silicone layer. Statistical analyses included one-way and repeated measure ANOVA to test the difference between the fabrication methods and categories of measured points (${\alpha}$=.05), respectively. RESULTS. The mean gap differed significantly with fabrication methods (P<.001). Casting produced the narrowest gap in each of the four measured positions, whereas CG, AG, and IG proved narrower in computer-aided milling than in DMLS. Thus, with the exception of MG, all positions exhibited a significant difference between computer-aided milling and DMLS (P<.05). CONCLUSION. Although the gap was found to vary with fabrication methods, the marginal and internal gaps of the copings fabricated by computer-aided milling and DMLS fell within the range of clinical acceptance (< $120{\mu}m$). However, the statistically significant difference to conventional casting indicates that the gaps in computer-aided milling and DMLS fabricated restorations still need to be further reduced.
Keywords
CAD/CAM system; Cobalt-chromium alloy; Computer-aided milling; Direct metal laser sintering; Marginal and internal fit;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Brecker SC. Porcelain baked to gold-A new medium in prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1956;6:801-10.   DOI
2 Johnston JF, Dykema RW, Cunningham DM. The use and construction of gold crowns with a fused porcelain veneer-A progress report. J Prosthet Dent 1956;6:811-21.   DOI
3 Christensen GJ. Longevity of posterior tooth dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:201-3.   DOI
4 Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009;28:44-56.   DOI
5 Weiss LE. Processes overview. In: Holdridge GM, Prinz FB, eds. Rapid Prototyping in Europe and Japan. Baltimore; Loyola College of Maryland; 1997. p. 5-20.
6 Petzold R, Zeilhofer HF, Kalender WA. Rapid protyping technology in medicine-basics and applications. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1999;23:277-84.   DOI
7 Yadroitsev I, Bertrand Ph, Smurov I. Parametric analysis of the selective laser melting process. Appl Surf Sci 2007;253:8064-9.   DOI
8 Gardner FM. Margins of complete crowns-Literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:396-400.   DOI
9 Wataha JC. Alloys for prosthodontic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:351-63.   DOI
10 Wataha JC, Messer RL. Casting alloys. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:vii-viii, 499-512.
11 Duncan JD. The casting accuracy of nickel-chromium alloys for fixed prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:63-8.   DOI
12 Ucar Y, Akova T, Akyil MS, Brantley WA. Internal fit evaluation of crowns prepared using a new dental crown fabrication technique: laser-sintered Co-Cr crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:253-9.   DOI
13 Regish KM, Sharma D, Prithviraj DR, Nair A, Raghavan R. Evaluation and comparison of the internal fit and marginal accuracy of base metal (nickelchromium) and zirconia copings before and after ceramic veneering: a sem study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2013;21:44-8.
14 Eames WB, O'Neal SJ, Monteiro J, Miller C, Roan JD Jr, Cohen KS. Techniques to improve the seating of castings. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;96:432-7.   DOI
15 Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:405-8.   DOI
16 van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12.   DOI
17 Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-11.   DOI
18 Beuer F, Aggstaller H, Edelhoff D, Gernet W, Sorensen J. Marginal and internal fits of fixed dental prostheses zirconia retainers. Dent Mater 2009;25:94-102.   DOI
19 Ortorp A, Jönsson D, Mouhsen A, Vult von Steyern P. The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2011;27:356-63.   DOI
20 Quante K, Ludwig K, Kern M. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology. Dent Mater 2008;24:1311-5.   DOI
21 Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G. Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns-validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:116-22.   DOI
22 Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:18-24.   DOI
23 Pelekanos S, Koumanou M, Koutayas SO, Zinelis S, Eliades G. Micro-CT evaluation of the marginal fit of different InCeram alumina copings. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009;4:278-92.
24 Rahme HY, Tehini GE, Adib SM, Ardo AS, Rifai KT. In vitro evaluation of the "replica technique" in the measurement of the fit of Procera crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9:25-32.
25 Council on Dental Materials and Devices. Revised American National Standards Instititute/American Dental Association Specification No. 8 for Zinc Phosphate Cement. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;96:121-3.   DOI
26 Assif D, Rimer Y, Aviv I. The flow of zinc phosphate cement under a full-coverage restoration and its effect on marginal adaptation according to the location of cement application. Quintessence Int 1987;18:765-74.
27 McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-11.   DOI
28 Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick JD, Chappell RP. Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to-metal and two types of ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:26-31.   DOI
29 Gulker I. Margins. N Y State Dent J 1985;51:213-5, 217.