Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.1.69

Comparative study of the shear bond strength of various veneering materials on grade II commercially pure titanium  

Lee, Eun-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine and Medical Research Institute, Chungbuk National University)
Jun, Sul-Gi (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Wright, Robert F. (Department of Prosthodontics, University of North Carolina School of Dentistry)
Park, Eun-Jin (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.7, no.1, 2015 , pp. 69-75 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. To compare the shear bond strength of various veneering materials to grade II commercially pure titanium (CP-Ti). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty specimens of CP-Ti disc with 9 mm diameter and 10 mm height were divided into three experimental groups. Each group was bonded to heat-polymerized acrylic resin (Lucitone 199), porcelain (Triceram), and indirect composite (Sinfony) with 7 mm diameter and 2 mm height. For the control group (n=10), Lucitone 199 were applied on type IV gold alloy castings. All samples were thermocycled for 5000 cycles in $5-55^{\circ}C$ water. The maximum shear bond strength (MPa) was measured with a Universal Testing Machine. After the shear bond strength test, the failure mode was assessed with an optic microscope and a scanning electron microscope. Statistical analysis was carried out with a Kruskal-Wallis Test and Mann-Whitney Test. RESULTS. The mean shear bond strength and standard deviations for experimental groups were as follows: Ti-Lucitone 199 ($12.11{\pm}4.44$ MPa); Ti-Triceram ($11.09{\pm}1.66$ MPa); Ti-Sinfony ($4.32{\pm}0.64$ MPa). All of these experimental groups showed lower shear bond strength than the control group ($16.14{\pm}1.89$ MPa). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the Ti-Lucitone 199 group and the control group, and the Ti-Lucitone 199 group and the Ti-Triceram group. Most of the failure patterns in all experimental groups were adhesive failures. CONCLUSION. The shear bond strength of veneering materials such as heat-polymerized acrylic resin, porcelain, and indirect composite to CP-Ti was compatible to that of heatpolymerized acrylic resin to cast gold alloy.
Keywords
Titanium; Bond strength; Veneering material; Heat-polymerized acrylic resin; Porcelain; Indirect composite;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Taira Y, Yanagida H, Matsumura H, Yoshida K, Atsuta M, Suzuki S. Adhesive bonding of titanium with a thione-phos- phate dual functional primer and self-curing luting agents. Eur J Oral Sci 2000;108:456-60.   DOI
2 Vojvodic D, Predanic-Gasparac H, Brkic H, Celebic A. The bond strength of polymers and metal surfaces using the ‘silicoater' technique. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:493-9.   DOI
3 Andrade Tarozzo LS, Chiarello De Mattos Mda G, Faria Ribeiro R, Semprini M. Comparison of retentive systems for composites used as alternatives to porcelain in fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:572-8.   DOI
4 Adachi M, Mackert JR Jr, Parry EE, Fairhurst CW. Oxide adherence and porcelain bonding to titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Dent Res 1990;69:1230-5.   DOI
5 Atsu S, Berksun S. Bond strength of three porcelains to two forms of titanium using two firing atmospheres. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:567-74.   DOI
6 Low D, Sumii T, Swain M. Thermal expansion coefficient of titanium casting. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:239-42.
7 Togaya T, Suzuki M, Tsutsumi S, Ida K. An application of pure titanium to the metal porcelain system. Dent Mater J 1983;2:210-9.   DOI
8 Petridis H, Garefis P, Hirayama H, Kafantaris NM, Koidis PT. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: Part 1. Comparison of shear bond strengths between different metal- resin bonding systems and a metal-ceramic system. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:635-9.
9 Tanaka T, Kamada K, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. A comparison of water temperatures for thermocycling of metal-bonded resin specimens. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:345-9.   DOI
10 Kim JY, Pfeiffer P, Niedermeier W. Effect of laboratory procedures and thermocycling on the shear bond strength of resin-metal bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:184-9.   DOI
11 Kourtis SG. Bond strengths of resin-to-metal bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:136-45.   DOI
12 Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89-99.   DOI
13 Rossomando KJ, Wendt SL Jr. Thermocycling and dwell times in microleakage evaluation for bonded restorations. Dent Mater 1995;11:47-51.   DOI
14 Persson M, Bergman M. Metal-ceramic bond strength. Acta Odontol Scand 1996;54:160-5.   DOI
15 Probster L, Maiwald U, Weber H. Three-point bending strength of ceramics fused to cast titanium. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:313-9.   DOI
16 Stannard JG, Marks L, Kanchanatawewat K. Effect of multiple firing on the bond strength of selected matched porcelain- fused-to-metal combinations. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63: 627-9.   DOI
17 Jemt T, Back T, Petersson A. Precision of CNC-milled titanium frameworks for implant treatment in the edentulous jaw. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:209-15.
18 Lautenschlager EP, Monaghan P. Titanium and titanium alloys as dental materials. Int Dent J 1993;43:245-53.
19 King AW, Lautenschlager E, Chai J, Gilbert J. A comparison of the hardness of different types of titanium and conventional metal ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:314-9.   DOI
20 Wang RR, Fenton A. Titanium for prosthodontic applications: a review of the literature. Quintessence Int 1996;27: 401-8.
21 Riedy SJ, Lang BR, Lang BE. Fit of implant frameworks fabricated by different techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:596-604.   DOI
22 Ortorp A, Jemt T, Back T, Jalevik T. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:194-200.
23 Gilbert JL, Covey DA, Lautenschlager EP. Bond characteristics of porcelain fused to milled titanium. Dent Mater 1994; 10:134-40.   DOI
24 Kimura H, Horng CJ, Okazaki M, Takahashi J. Oxidation effects on porcelain-titanium interface reactions and bond strength. Dent Mater J 1990;9:91-9.   DOI
25 Wang RR, Welsch GE, Monteiro O. Silicon nitride coating on titanium to enable titanium-ceramic bonding. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;46:262-70.   DOI
26 Ohkubo C, Watanabe I, Hosoi T, Okabe T. Shear bond strengths of polymethyl methacrylate to cast titanium and cobalt-chromium frameworks using five metal primers. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:50-7.   DOI
27 Miyakawa O, Watanabe K, Okawa S, Nakano S, Kobayashi M, Shiokawa N. Layered structure of cast titanium surface. Dent Mater J 1989;8:175-85.   DOI
28 Taira Y, Matsumura H, Yoshida K, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. Influence of surface oxidation of titanium on adhesion. J Dent 1998;26:69-73.   DOI
29 Kaus T, Probster L, Weber H. Clinical follow-up study of ceramic veneered titanium restorations-three-year results. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:9-15.
30 Cai Z, Bunce N, Nunn ME, Okabe T. Porcelain adherence to dental cast CP titanium: effects of surface modifications. Biomaterials 2001;22:979-86.   DOI
31 Lee CF, Pierpont HP, Strickler ER. The effect of bead attachment systems on casting patterns and resultant tensile bond strength of composite resin veneer cast restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:623-30.   DOI
32 Shue SL, Nicholls JI, Townsend JD. The effect of metal retentive designs on resin veneer retention. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:297-305.   DOI
33 McConnell RJ. Metal-resin bonding. J Calif Dent Assoc 1993; 21:38-42.
34 Jones RM, Moore BK, Goodacre CJ, Munoz-Viveros CA. Microleakage and shear bond strength of resin and porcelain veneers bonded to cast alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:221-8.   DOI
35 Barzilay I, Myers ML, Cooper LB, Graser GN. Mechanical and chemical retention of laboratory cured composite to metal surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:131-7.   DOI
36 Faria AC1, de Matos RL, Rodrigues RC, Antunes RP, Ribeiro RF, de Mattos Mda G. Comparative study of chemical and mechanical retentive systems for bonding of indirect composite resin to commercially pure titanium. Braz Dent J 2008; 19:134-8.   DOI