Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.6.483

Faculty-supervised measurements of the face and of mandibular movements on young adults  

Woelfel, Julian B. (Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, The Ohio State University College of Dentistry)
Igarashi, Takayoshi (Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Nihon University School of Dentistry)
Dong, Jin-Keun (Department of Prosthodontics, Wonkwang University College of Dentistry)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.6, no.6, 2014 , pp. 483-490 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to determine the average facial proportions and mandibular movement capacity of 316 first-year dental students who carefully recorded them on each other. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This early exacting clinical experience was closely supervised by the authors in Columbus, Ohio during 1969-70. Five vertical and six horizontal distances were measured on each subject's face. An ala-tragus line and an occlusal line were drawn on the left side of the face to determine if these two lines were parallel. Measurements of mandibular movements involved maximum normal and hinge opening at the incisors and maximum amounts of right, left lateral and protrusive excursions of the mandible. RESULTS. The ala width and distance between the tips of upper right and left canine cusps averaged (35.2 mm and 34.8 mm) but with very large individual variations. The distance between ala to occlusal plane lines was 29.9 mm at the tragus and 31.3 mm near the ala. The angle between orbitale and ala-tragus averaged 13.6 degrees. CONCLUSION. The upper lip length was the most variable and the distance between the pupils was the most stable of the eleven facial measurements. The ala-tragus line and the occlusal plane lines were for all practical purposes parallel. Maximum jaw opening averaged 51.2 mm which was 3.0 times larger than maximal hinge opening of 17.2 mm. The maximum right plus left side jaw excursions (9.2 and 9.4 mm) totaled 18.6 mm, 2.3 times more than the 8.0 mm mean maximum forward protrusion.
Keywords
Measurements of the face; Anthropometry; Ala-tragus line; Occlusal plane; Maximum and normal mandibular openings and excursions;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Peck H, Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 1970;40:284-318.
2 House MM, Loop JL. Form and color harmony in the dental art. Monograph, Whittier, Calif. MM, House; 1939.
3 Wehner PJ, Hickey JC, Boucher CO. Selection of artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1967;18:222-32.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Lenner PR. An Introduction to dental anatomy and esthetics. Quintessence Publishing Co.; Chicago, IL; 1985. p. 246-71.
5 Broadbent TR, Mathews VL. Artistic relationships in surface anatomy of the face: application to reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946). 1957;20:1-17.   DOI
6 Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Hreczko TA, Deutsch C, Munro IR. Anthropometric proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face in young white adults. Am J Orthod 1984;86:52-60.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Farkas LG. Anthropometry of the head and face. 2nd ed. New York; Raven Press; 1994.
8 Farkas LG, Kolar JC. Anthropometrics and art in the aesthetics of women's faces. Clin Plast Surg 1987;14:599-616.
9 Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, Serrao G. Facial three-dimensional morphometry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:86-93.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Sforza C, Grandi G, Binelli M, Dolci C, De Menezes M, Ferrario VF. Age- and sex-related changes in three-dimensional lip morphology. Forensic Sci Int 2010;200:182.e1-7.
11 Nagle RJ, Sears VH. Denture prosthetics, complete dentures, CV Mosby Co.; St. Louis; Toronto, London; 1962. p. 134.
12 Lejoyeux J. Prothese complete. Librairie Maloine S.A., Paris; 1967. p. 15.
13 Ismail YH, Bowman JF. Position of the occlusal plane in natural and artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1968;20:407-11.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Hickey JC, Zarb GA, Bolender CL. Boucher's prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 9th ed, CV Mosby Co.; St. Louis, Toronto, London; 1985. p. 292.
15 Gedrange T, Mai R, Richter G, Wolf P, Lupp A, Harzer W. X-ray microanalysis of elements in the masticatory muscle after paresis of the right masseter. J Dent Res 2005;84:1026-30.   DOI
16 Ingervall B. Range of movement of mandible in children. Scand J Dent Res 1970;78:311-22.
17 Hutzen D, Proff P, Gedrange T, Biffar R, Bernhard O, Kocher T, Kordass B. Occlusal contact patterns-population-based data. Ann Anat 2007;189:407-11.   DOI
18 Posselt U. Movement areas of the mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1957:7:375-85.   DOI
19 Posselt U. Physiology of occlusion and rehabilitation. Blackwell, Oxford; 1962. p. 41, 56, 181.
20 Sheppard IM, Sheppard SM. Maximal incisal opening-a diagnostic index? J Dent Med 1965;20:13-5.
21 Theusner J, Plesh O, Curtis DA, Hutton JE. Axiographic tracings of temporomandibular joint movements. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:209-15.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Posselt U, Nevstedt P. Registration of the condyle path inclination by intraoral wax records ? its practical value. J Prosthet Dent 1961;11:43-7.
23 Yatabe M, Zwijnenburg A, Megens CC, Naeije M. The kinematic center: a reference for condylar movements. J Dent Res 1995;74:1644-8.   DOI
24 Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Kolar JC, Munro IR. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: revision of neoclassical canons. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;75:328-38.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 da Vinci L. Trattario della pittura, Bologna, In E. Boyd (ed), Origines of the study of human growth. University of Oregon Health Science Center Foundation, Portland; 1980. p. 167.
26 Francesca P. Study of the proportion of the head. In Berrry WA (ed): Drawing the human forms: Methods, Sources, Concepts. Van Nostrand Reinhold, NewYork; 1977. p. 116.
27 Scheid RC, Weiss G. Woelfel's dental anatomy: 8th ed, Wolters Kluwer Health / Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2007. p. 263, 267, 277, 288.
28 Visser A, Naeije M, Hansson TL. The temporal/masseter co-contraction: an electromyographic and clinical evaluation of short-term stabilization splint therapy in myogenous CMD patients. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:387-9.   DOI
29 Solberg WK, Woo MW, Houston JB. Prevalence of mandibular dysfunction in young adults. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;98:25-34.   DOI
30 Lee L, Lee KJ. A study of facial proportions and sketching of facial contours. Ear Nose Throat J 1979;58:150-8.
31 Reicheneder C, Proff P, Baumert U, Gedrange T. Comparison of maximum mouth-opening capacity and condylar path length in adults and children during the growth period. Ann Anat 2008;190:344-50.   DOI