Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.4.285

Characteristics and osteogenic effect of zirconia porous scaffold coated with ${\beta}$-TCP/HA  

Song, Young-Gyun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Cho, In-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.6, no.4, 2014 , pp. 285-294 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the properties of a porous zirconia scaffold coated with bioactive materials and compare the in vitro cellular behavior of MC3T3-E1 preosteoblastic cells to titanium and zirconia disks and porous zirconia scaffolds. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Titanium and zirconia disks were prepared. A porous zirconia scaffold was fabricated with an open cell polyurethane disk foam template. The porous zirconia scaffolds were coated with ${\beta}$-TCP, HA and a compound of ${\beta}$-TCP and HA (BCP). The characteristics of the specimens were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive x-ray spectrometer (EDX), and x-ray diffractometry (XRD). The dissolution tests were analyzed by an inductively coupled plasma spectrometer (ICP). The osteogenic effect of MC3T3-E1 cells was assessed via cell counting and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RESULTS. The EDX profiles showed the substrate of zirconia, which was surrounded by the Ca-P layer. In the dissolution test, dissolved $Ca^{2+}$ ions were observed in the following decreasing order; ${\beta}$-TCP > BCP > HA (P<.05). In the cellular experiments, the cell proliferation on titanium disks appeared significantly lower in comparison to the other groups after 5 days (P<.05). The zirconia scaffolds had greater values than the zirconia disks (P<.05). The mRNA level of osteocalcin was highest on the non-coated zirconia scaffolds after 7 days. CONCLUSION. Zirconia had greater osteoblast cell activity than titanium. The interconnecting pores of the zirconia scaffolds showed enhanced proliferation and cell differentiation. The activity of osteoblast was more affected by microstructure than by coating materials.
Keywords
Zirconia porous scaffold; Osteogenic effect; Cellular response; ${\beta}$-TCP; HA;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Hench LL, Polak JM. Third-generation biomedical materials. Science 2002;295:1014-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Fransson C, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Berglundh T. Prevalence of subjects with progressive bone loss at implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:440-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Klinge B. Peri-implant marginal bone loss: an academic controversy or a clinical challenge? Eur J Oral Implantol 2012;5: S13-9.
4 Kim YK, Kim SG, Yun PY, Yeo IS, Jin SC, Oh JS, Kim HJ, Yu SK, Lee SY, Kim JS, Um IW, Jeong MA, Kim GW. Autogenous teeth used for bone grafting: a comparison with traditional grafting materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2014;117:e39-45.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Bae JH, Kim YK, Kim SG, Yun PY, Kim JS. Sinus bone graft using new alloplastic bone graft material (Osteon)-II: clinical evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:e14-20.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Dalkyz M, Ozcan A, Yapar M, Gokay N, Yuncu M. Evaluation of the effects of different biomaterials on bone defects. Implant Dent 2000;9:226-35.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Carotenuto G, Spagnuolo G, Ambrosio L, Nicolais L. Macroporous hydroxyapatite as alloplastic material for dental applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1999;10:671-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Chao SY, Poon CK. Histologic study of tissue response to implanted hydroxylapatite in two patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987;45:359-62.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Frame JW, Browne RM, Brady CL. Hydroxyapatite as a bone substitute in the jaws. Biomaterials 1981;2:19-22.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Daculsi G, LeGeros RZ, Nery E, Lynch K, Kerebel B. Transformation of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics in vivo: ultrastructural and physicochemical characterization. J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23:883-94.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Nery EB, LeGeros RZ, Lynch KL, Lee K. Tissue response to biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic with different ratios of HA/beta TCP in periodontal osseous defects. J Periodontol. 1992;63:729-35.   DOI
12 Gauthier O, Bouler JM, Aguado E, Pilet P, Daculsi G. Macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics: influence of macropore diameter and macroporosity percentage on bone ingrowth. Biomaterials 1998;19:133-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Daculsi G, Passuti N, Martin S, Deudon C, Legeros RZ, Raher S. Macroporous calcium phosphate ceramic for long bone surgery in humans and dogs. Clinical and histological study. J Biomed Mater Res 1990;24:379-96.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Jiang G, Shi D. Coating of hydroxyapatite on highly porous $Al_2O_3$ substrate for bone substitutes. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;43:77-81.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Sollazzo V, Pezzetti F, Scarano A, Piattelli A, Bignozzi CA, Massari L, Brunelli G, Carinci F. Zirconium oxide coating improves implant osseointegration in vivo. Dent Mater 2008;24:357-61.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Pae A, Lee H, Kim HS, Baik J, Woo YH. Cellular attachment and gene expression of osteoblast-like cells on zirconia ceramic surfaces. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2008;46:227-37.
17 Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999;20:1-25.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Piconi C, Burger W, Richter HG, Cittadini A, Maccauro G, Covacci V, Bruzzese N, Ricci GA, Marmo E. Y-TZP ceramics for artificial joint replacements. Biomaterials 1998;19:1489-94.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Schultze-Mosgau S, Schliephake H, Radespiel-Troger M, Neukam FW. Osseointegration of endodontic endosseous cones: zirconium oxide vs titanium. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:91-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
21 Andreiotelli M, Wenz HJ, Kohal RJ. Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:32-47.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 McKinney RV Jr, Steflik DE, Koth DL. The biologic response to the single-crystal sapphire endosteal dental implant: scanning electron microscopic observations. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:372-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Vagkopoulou T, Koutayas SO, Koidis P, Strub JR. Zirconia in dentistry: Part 1. Discovering the nature of an upcoming bioceramic. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009;4:130-51.
24 Wang D, Christensen K, Chawla K, Xiao G, Krebsbach PH, Franceschi RT. Isolation and characterization of MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast subclones with distinct in vitro and in vivo differentiation/ mineralization potential. J Bone Miner Res 1999;14:893-903.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Steinemann SG. Titanium--the material of choice? Periodontol 2000 1998;17:7-21.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Itala AI, Ylanen HO, Ekholm C, Karlsson KH, Aro HT. Pore diameter of more than 100 microm is not requisite for bone ingrowth in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;58:679-83.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Aboushelib MN, Salem NA, Taleb AL, El Moniem NM. Influence of surface nano-roughness on osseointegration of zirconia implants in rabbit femur heads using selective infiltration etching technique. J Oral Implantol 2013;39:583-90.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Pae A, Lee H, Kim HS, Kwon YD, Woo YH. Attachment and growth behaviour of human gingival fibroblasts on titanium and zirconia ceramic surfaces. Biomed Mater 2009;4:025005.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Tai G, Christodoulou I, Bishop AE, Polak JM. Use of green fluorescent fusion protein to track activation of the transcription factor osterix during early osteoblast differentiation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005;333:1116-22.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Franceschi RT, Xiao G. Regulation of the osteoblast-specific transcription factor, Runx2: responsiveness to multiple signal transduction pathways. J Cell Biochem 2003;88:446-54.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Barrere F, van der Valk CM, Dalmeijer RA, Meijer G, van Blitterswijk CA, de Groot K, Layrolle P. Osteogenecity of octacalcium phosphate coatings applied on porous metal implants J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;66:779-88.
32 Sudo H, Kodama HA, Amagai Y, Yamamoto S, Kasai S. In vitro differentiation and calcification in a new clonal osteogenic cell line derived from newborn mouse calvaria. J Cell Biol 1983;96:191-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Wohlfahrt JC, Lyngstadaas SP, Ronold HJ, Saxegaard E, Ellingsen JE, Karlsson S, Aass AM. Porous titanium granules in the surgical treatment of peri-implant osseous defects: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:401-10.
34 Lu J, Descamps M, Dejou J, Koubi G, Hardouin P, Lemaitre J, Proust JP. The biodegradation mechanism of calcium phosphate biomaterials in bone. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;63:408-12.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Guazzato M, Quach L, Albakry M, Swain MV. Influence of surface and heat treatments on the flexural strength of Y-TZP dental ceramic. J Dent 2005;33:9-18.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Langhoff JD, Voelter K, Scharnweber D, Schnabelrauch M, Schlottig F, Hefti T, Kalchofner K, Nuss K, von Rechenberg B. Comparison of chemically and pharmaceutically modified titanium and zirconia implant surfaces in dentistry: a study in sheep. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:1125-32.   DOI   ScienceOn