Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.4.253

Gap comparison between single crown and three-unit bridge zirconia substructures  

Anunmana, Chuchai (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University)
Charoenchitt, Masnisa (Dental Division, Queen Sirikit Naval Hospital)
Asvanund, Chanavut (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.6, no.4, 2014 , pp. 253-258 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. To compare marginal and internal gaps of zirconia substructure of single crowns with those of three-unit fixed dental prostheses. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Standardized Co-Cr alloy simulated second premolar and second molar abutments were fabricated and subsequently duplicated into type-III dental stone for working casts. After that, all zirconia substructures were made using $Lava^{TM}$ system. Marginal and internal gaps were measured in 2 planes (mesial-distal plane and buccal-palatal plane) at 5 locations: marginal opening (MO), chamfer area (CA), axial wall (AW), cusp tip (CT) and mid-occlusal (OA) using Replica technique. RESULTS. There were significant differences between gaps at all locations. The $mean{\pm}SD$ of marginal gap in premolar was $43.6{\pm}0.4{\mu}m$ and $46.5{\pm}0.5{\mu}m$ for single crown and 3-unit bridge substructure respectively. For molar substructure the $mean{\pm}SD$ of marginal gap was $48.5{\pm}0.4{\mu}m$ and $52.6{\pm}0.4{\mu}m$ for single crown and 3-unit bridge respectively. The largest gaps were found at the occlusal area, which was $150.5{\pm}0.5{\mu}m$ and $154.5{\pm}0.4{\mu}m$ for single and 3-unit bridge premolar substructures respectively and $146.5{\pm}0.4{\mu}m$ and $211.5{\pm}0.4{\mu}m$ for single and 3-unit bridge molar substructure respectively. CONCLUSION. Independent-samples t-test showed significant differences of gap in zirconia substructure between single crowns and three-unit bridge (P<.001). Therefore, the span length has the effect on the fit of zirconia substructure that is fabricated using CAD/CAM technique especially at the occlusal area.
Keywords
CAD/CAM; Ceramics; Zirconia; Marginal fit; 3-unit bridge;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Devigus A, Lombardi G. Shading Vita YZ substructures: influence on value and chroma, part I. Int J Comput Dent 2004;7:293-301.
2 Beuer F, Neumeier P, Naumann M. Marginal fit of 14-unit zirconia fixed dental prosthesis retainers. J Oral Rehabil 2009; 36:142-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Lang NP, Kiel RA, Anderhalden K. Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins. J Clin Periodontol 1983;10:563-78.   DOI
4 Valderhaug J, Heloe LA. Oral hygiene in a group of supervised patients with fixed prostheses. J Periodontol 1977;48: 221-4.   DOI
5 Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113: 174-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Bindl A, Mormann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:441-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Schaerer P, Sato T, Wohlwend A. A comparison of the marginal fit of three cast ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:534-42.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick JD, Chappell RP. Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to-metal and two types of ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:26-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Weaver JD, Johnson GH, Bales DJ. Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:747-53.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Boening KW, Walter MH, Reppel PD. Non-cast titanium restorations in fixed prosthodontics. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19: 281-7.   DOI
11 Fransson B, Oilo G, Gjeitanger R. The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater 1985;1:197-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Kokubo Y, Ohkubo C, Tsumita M, Miyashita A, Vult von Steyern P, Fukushima S. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:526-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Quintas AF, Oliveira F, Bottino MA. Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents: an in vitro evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:250-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Bornemann G, Lemelson S, Luthardt R. Innovative method for the analysis of the internal 3D fitting accuracy of Cerec-3 crowns. Int J Comput Dent 2002;5:177-82.
15 Tuntiprawon M, Wilson PR. The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Aust Dent J 1995;40:17-21.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Karlsson S. A clinical evaluation of fixed bridges, 10 years following insertion. J Oral Rehabil 1986;13:423-32.   DOI
17 Reich S, Kappe K, Teschner H, Schmitt J. Clinical fit of fourunit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:579-84.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Wettstein F, Sailer I, Roos M, Hammerle CH. Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:272-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Rosenblum MA, Schulman A. A review of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:297-307.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Magne P, Belser U. Esthetic improvements and in vitro testing of In-Ceram Alumina and Spinell ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:459-66.
21 Shepard FE, Moon PC, Grant GC, Fretwell LD. Allergic contact stomatitis from a gold alloy-fixed partial denture. J Am Dent Assoc 1983;106:198-9.   DOI
22 McLean JW, Hughes TH. The reinforcement of dental porcelain with ceramic oxides. Br Dent J 1965;119:251-67.
23 Kelly JR, Tesk JA, Sorensen JA. Failure of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in vitro and in vivo: analysis and modeling. J Dent Res 1995;74:1253-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Olsson KG, Furst B, Andersson B, Carlsson GE. A longterm retrospective and clinical follow-up study of In-Ceram Alumina FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:150-6.
25 Sorensen JA, Cruz M, Mito WT, Raffeiner O, Meredith HR, Foser HP. A clinical investigation on three-unit fixed partial dentures fabricated with a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1999;11:95-106; quiz 108.
26 Kelly JR. Dental ceramics: current thinking and trends. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:viii, 513-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Torres TJ, Knode H. In-Ceram fixed partial dentures: three-year clinical trial results. J Calif Dent Assoc 1998;26:207-14.
28 Vult von Steyern P, Jonsson O, Nilner K. Five-year evaluation of posterior all-ceramic three-unit (In-Ceram) FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:379-84.
29 Libby G, Arcuri MR, LaVelle WE, Hebl L. Longevity of fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:127-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008;24:299-307.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Abduo J, Lyons K, Swain M. Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:866-76.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Luthy H, Hammerle CH. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:383-8.
33 Sailer I, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CH. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: Fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:86-96.
34 Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:557-62.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:viii, 531-44.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Abduo J, Lyons K, Swain M. Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:866-76.   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Campbell SD, Sozio RB. Evaluation of the fit and strength of an all-ceramic fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59:301-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Glauser R, Sailer I, Wohlwend A, Studer S, Schibli M, Scharer P. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:285-90.