Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.2.146

A modified technique for extraoral cementation of implant retained restorations for preventing excess cement around the margins  

Yuzbasioglu, Emir (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Istanbul Medipol University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.6, no.2, 2014 , pp. 146-149 More about this Journal
Abstract
The major drawback of cement-retained restorations is the extrusion of the excess cement into the peri-implant sulcus, with subsequent complications. Insufficient removal of the excess cement may initiate a local inflammatory process, which may lead to implant failure. This article presents a method of controlling cement flow on implant abutments, minimizing the excess cement around implant-retained restorations.
Keywords
Excess cement; Cement retained restorations; Peri-implant disease;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Gapski R, Neugeboren N, Pomeranz AZ, Reissner MW. Endosseous implant failure influenced by crown cementation: a clinical case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:943-6.
2 Wilson TG Jr. The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study. J Periodontol 2009;80:1388-92.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Agar JR, Cameron SM, Hughbanks JC, Parker MH. Cement removal from restorations luted to titanium abutments with simulated subgingival margins. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:43-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Dumbrigue HB, Abanomi AA, Cheng LL. Techniques to minimize excess luting agent in cement-retained implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:112-4.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Schwedhelm ER, Lepe X, Aw TC. A crown venting technique for the cementation of implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:89-90.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Wadhwani C, Pineyro A. Technique for controlling the cement for an implant crown. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:57-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue-Integrated Prosthesis: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago; Quintessence Publishing; 1985.
8 Wannfors K, Smedberg JI. A prospective clinical evaluation of different single-tooth restoration designs on osseointegrated implants. A 3-year follow-up of Brånemark implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:453-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Eckert SE, Wollan PC. Retrospective review of 1170 endosseous implants placed in partially edentulous jaws. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:415-21.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Avivi-Arber L, Zarb GA. Clinical effectiveness of implantsupported single-tooth replacement: the Toronto Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:311-21.
11 Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:719-28.
12 Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Jones JD, Kaiser DA. A new gingival retraction impression system for a one-stage root-form implant. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:371-3.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 2nd ed. St. Louis; MO; Mosby-Year Book Inc; 1999. p. 549-73.
15 Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Bogacki MT, Tietge JD. Use of lut- ing agents with an implant system: Part I. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:737-41.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Quirynen M, De Soete M, van Steenberghe D. Infectious risks for oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:1-19.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Lee A, Okayasu K, Wang HL. Screw- versus cement-retained implant restorations: current concepts. Implant Dent 2010;19:8-15.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Pauletto N, Lahiffe BJ, Walton JN. Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:865-8.