Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.1.66

Implant overdenture impressions using a dynamic impression concept  

Lee, Byung-Kil (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Park, Sang-Hun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Lee, Cheong-Hee (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Cho, Jin-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.6, no.1, 2014 , pp. 66-70 More about this Journal
Abstract
A dynamic impression is a functional impression that records the functional movement of the patient's own muscle and muscle attachment. This process reduces the number of random factors. This article describes a method for making a special tray using a dynamic impression concept that was made from provisional dentures used for implant healing. The individual tray is used to make a wash-impression to record the features of the mucosa in detail. The main advantage of this technique is that it provides a functional relationship of the implant components to the supporting tissues without overextension because provisional denture had been used for 2 months and the border length of individual tray was nearly the same as that of provisional denture. The delivery of the prosthesis constructed using this impression technique is time-saving because there is no need for border molding and there are fewer post-insertion appliance adjustments.
Keywords
Implant overdenture; Dynamic impression; Tissue conditioner; Functional impression;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Uludag B, Ozturk O, Celik G. Alternate functional impression technique for implant-retained overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:242-3.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Jannesar S, Siadat H, Alikhasi M. A dual impression technique for implant overdentures. J Prosthodont 2007;16:327-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Cho GC, Landesman M, Adomian JG. An alternative altered cast technique for a distal extension removable partial denture. J Calif Dent Assoc 1997;25:377-80.
4 Razek MK. Assessment of tissue conditioning materials for functional impressions. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:376-80.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Chen IC, Brudvik JS, Mancl LA, Rubenstein JE, Chitswe K, Raigrodski AJ. Freedom of rotation of selected overdenture attachments: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2011;106:78-86.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Uludag B. An alternate pressure-free functional impression technique for implant-retained overdentures. J Oral Implantol 2010;36:205-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 McCarthy JA, Moser JB. Tissue conditioners as functional impression materials. J Oral Rehabil 1978;5:357-64.   DOI
8 Elsyad MA, El-Waseef FA, Al-Mahdy YF, Fouad MM. A comparison of mandibular denture base deformation with different impression techniques for implant overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:127-33.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Wilson HJ, Tomlin HR, Osborne J. The assessment of temporary soft materials used in prosthetics. Br Dent J 1969;126: 303-6.
10 Uludag B, Cogalan K, Polat S. An alternative impression technique for implant-retained overdentures with locator attachments. J Oral Implantol 2010;36:451-3.   DOI   ScienceOn