Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.1.53

Residual bone height measured by panoramic radiography in older edentulous Korean patients  

Liang, Xiang Hua (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Kim, Young-Mi (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Cho, In-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.6, no.1, 2014 , pp. 53-59 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to obtain statistical data on the residual bone height at different natural tooth positions by panoramic radiography in edentulous Korean patients aged 60-90 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study included the diagnostic panoramic radiographs of 180 randomly selected edentulous patients without systemic diseases affecting bone. The radiographic selection criteria included absence of obvious facial asymmetry, clearly visible anatomic structures, and no surgical and fracture history. The panoramic radiographs of 79 patients met these criteria and were used in the analysis. The same researcher processed all the radiographs by using a standardized method. The height of the residual bone was measured at 18 predetermined sites (7 in the maxilla and 11 in the mandible) on digitized and printed radiographs by using a Digimatic caliper, triangle, and ruler. Gender- and age-related differences were statistically analyzed by using the t-test and rank-sum test (${\alpha}=0.05$). RESULTS. The maxillary residual bone height did not show significant gender-related differences, but male patients had significantly higher residual bone in the mandible(P<.05). No significant height differences at the measured sites were noted among the 60s, 70s, and 80s age groups. CONCLUSION. Dentists should pay greater attention to older female edentulous patients because they are more prone to rapid residual bone resorption. Residual bone resorption may not be affected by age.
Keywords
Radiography; Panoramic; Alveolar bone loss; Denture; Complete; Dental implants; Maxilla; Mandible;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, Head T, Lund JP, MacEntee M, Mericske-Stern R, Mojon P, Morais J, Naert I, Payne AG, Penrod J, Stoker GT Jr, Tawse-Smith A, Taylor TD, Thomason JM, Thomson WM, Wismeijer D. The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. May 24-25, 2002. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:413-4.
2 Desjardins RP. Tissue-integrated prostheses for the edentulous patients: Branemark (Nobelpharma) System. In: Caswell CW, Clark AE Jr, editors. Dental implant prosthodontics. Philadelphia; J.B. Lippincott Co; 1991, p. 1-57.
3 Mercier P. Ridge reconstruction with hydroxylapatite. Part 1. Anatomy of the residual ridge. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988;65:505-10.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:120-32.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 2nd ed. St. Louis; CV Mosby; 1997, p. 3-12.
6 Brodeur JM, Laurin D, Vallee R, Lachapelle D. Nutrient intake and gastrointestinal disorders related to masticatory performance in the edentulous elderly. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70: 468-73.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Soikkonen K, Ainamo A, Xie Q. Height of the residual ridge and radiographic appearance of bony structure in the jaws of clinically edentulous elderly people. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:470-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Lee SM, Lee SS, Huh KH, Yi WJ, Heo MS, Choi SC. The effects of location of alveolar crest on the vertical bone heights on panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012;41: 117-21.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Shin JW. Dental anatomy. 3rd ed. Seoul; DaehanNarae pub.; 2010, p. 65-221.
10 Thorpe JO. Panoramic radiography in the general practice of dentistry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1967;24:781-92.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Crane GM, Ishaug SL, Mikos AG. Bone tissue engineering. Nat Med 1995;1:1322-4.   DOI
12 Rowe DJ. Bone loss in the elderly. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50: 607-10.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Hirai T, Ishijima T, Hashikawa Y, Yajima T. Osteoporosis and reduction of residual ridge in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:49-56.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Zarb GA, Bolender CL. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 2nd ed. St.Louis; CV Mosby; 1997, p. 10.
15 Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 3rd ed. St. Louis; CV Mosby; 2008, p. 939-51.
16 Mahon JM, Norling BK, Phoenix RD. Effect of varying fixture width on stress and strain distribution associated with an implant stack system. Implant Dent 2000;9:310-20.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Friberg B, Grondahl K, Lekholm U, Branemark PI. Longterm follow-up of severely atrophic edentulous mandibles reconstructed with short Brånemark implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:184-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Aparicio C, Perales P, Rangert B. Tilted implants as an alternative to maxillary sinus grafting: a clinical, radiologic, and periotest study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001;3:39-49.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Güler AU, Sumer M, Sumer P, Biçer I. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:741-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Devlin H, Ferguson MW. Alveolar ridge resorption and mandibular atrophy. A review of the role of local and systemic factors. Br Dent J 1991;170:101-4.   DOI   ScienceOn