Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.4.485

Bond strength of veneer ceramic and zirconia cores with different surface modifications after microwave sintering  

Saka, Muhammet (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University)
Yuzugullu, Bulem (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.5, no.4, 2013 , pp. 485-493 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. To evaluate the effects of surface treatments on shear bond strength (SBS) between microwave and conventionally sintered zirconia core/veneers. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 96 disc shaped Noritake Alliance zirconia specimens were fabricated using YenaDent CAM unit and were divided in 2 groups with respect to microwave or conventional methods (n=48/group). Surface roughness (Ra) evaluation was made with a profilometer on randomly selected microwave (n=10) and conventionally sintered (n=10) cores. Specimens were then assessed into 4 subgroups according to surface treatments applied (n=12/group). Groups for microwave (M) and conventionally (C) sintered core specimens were as follows; $M_C$,$C_C$: untreated (control group), $M_1,C_1:Al_2O_3$ sandblasting, $M_2,C_2$:liner, $M_3,C_3:Al_2O_3$ sandblasting followed by liner. Veneer ceramic was fired on zirconia cores and specimens were thermocycled (6000 cycles between $5^{\circ}-55^{\circ}C$). All specimens were subjected to SBS test using a universal testing machine at 0.5 mm/min, failure were evaluated under an optical microscope. Data were statistically analyzed using Shapiro Wilk, Levene, Post-hoc Tukey HSD and Student's t tests, Two-Way-Variance- Analysis and One-Way-Variance-Analysis (${\alpha}$=.05). RESULTS. Conventionally sintered specimens ($1.06{\pm}0.32{\mu}m$) showed rougher surfaces compared to microwave sintered ones ($0.76{\pm}0.32{\mu}m$)(P=.046), however, no correlation was found between SBS and surface roughness (r=-0.109, P=.658). The statistical comparison of the shear bond strengths of $C_3$ and $C_1$ group (P=.015); $C_C$ and $M_C$ group (P=.004) and $C_3$ and $M_3$ group presented statistically higher (P=.005) values. While adhesive failure was not seen in any of the groups, cohesive and combined patterns were seen in all groups. CONCLUSION. Based on the results of this in-vitro study, $Al_2O_{3-}$ sandblasting followed by liner application on conventionally sintered zirconia cores may be preferred to enhance bond strength.
Keywords
Microwave sintered zirconia; Shear bond strength; $Al_2O_3$ sandblasting; Liner; Optical microscope; Chipping;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Denry I, Holloway JA. Ceramics for dental applications: A review. Materials 2010;3:351-68.   DOI
2 Beuer F, Schweiger J, Eichberger M, Kappert HF, Gernet W, Edelhoff D. igh-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings-a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2009;25:121-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Huang SG, Li L, van der Biest O, Vleugels J. Microwave sintering of $CeO_{2}$ and $Y_{2}O_{3}$ co-stabilised $ZrO_{2}$ from stabilisercoated nanopowders. J Eur Ceram Soc 2007;27:689-93.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Roy R, Agrawal D, Cheng J, Gedevanishvili S. Full sintering of powdered-metal bodies in a microwave field. Nature 1999; 399:668-70.   DOI
5 Katz JD. Microwave sintering of ceramics. Annu Rev Mater Sci 1992;22:153-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Ruiz L, Readey MJ. Effect of heat-treatment on grain size, phase assemblage and mechanical properties of 3 mol% Y-TZP. J Am Ceram Soc 1996;79:2331-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Upadhyaya DD, Ghosh A, Dey GK, Prasad R, Suri AK. Microwave sintering of zirconia ceramics. J Mater Sci 2001; 36;4707-10.
8 Deng Y, Miranda P, Pajares A, Guiberteau F, Lawn BR. Fracture of ceramic/ceramic/polymer trilayers for biomechanical applications. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;67:828-33.
9 Al-Dohan HM, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Shear strength of core-veneer interface in bi-layered ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:349-55.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Saito A, Komine F, Blatz MB, Matsumura H. A comparison of bond strength of layered veneering porcelains to zirconia and metal. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104:247-57.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Guess PC, Kulis A, Witkowski S, Wolkewitz M, Zhang Y, Strub JR. Shear bond strengths between different zirconia cores and veneering ceramics and their susceptibility to thermocycling. Dent Mater 2008;24:1556-67.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Guazzato M, Proos K, Sara G, Swain MV. Strength, reliability, and mode of fracture of bilayered porcelain/core ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:142-9.
13 Raigrodski AJ, Chiche GJ, Potiket N, Hochstedler JL, Mohamed SE, Billiot S, Mercante DE. The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: a prospective clinical pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:237-44.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Isgro G, Pallav P, van der Zel JM, Feilzer AJ. The influence of the veneering porcelain and different surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength of a heat-pressed ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:465-73.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 al-Shehri SA, Mohammed H, Wilson CA. Influence of lamination on the flexural strength of a dental castable glass ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:23-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Ozyurt Z, Kazazoglu Z, Ünal A. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of veneering ceramics to zirconia. Dent Mater J 2010;29:138-46.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Luthy H, Gauckler LJ, Schärer P, Franz Hämmerle CH. Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. Quintessence Int 2006;37:685-93.
18 Prasad S, Monaco EA Jr, Kim H, Davis EL, Brewer JD. Comparison of porcelain surface and flexural strength obtained by microwave and conventional oven glazing. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:20-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008;24:299-307.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Creugers NH, Käyser AF, van ‹t Hof MA. A meta-analysis of durability data on conventional fixed bridges. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994;22:448-52.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Coornaert J, Adriaens P, De Boever J. Long-term clinical study of porcelain-fused-to-gold restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:338-42.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Valderhaug J. A 15-year clinical evaluation of fixed prosthodontics. Acta Odontol Scand 1991;49:35-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Harding AB, Norling BK, Teixeira EC. The effect of surface treatment of the interfacial surface on fatigue-related microtensile bond strength of milled zirconia to veneering porcelain. J Prosthodont 2012;21:346-52.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Mosharraf R, Rismanchian M, Savabi O, Ashtiani AH. Influence of surface modification techniques on shear bond strength between different zirconia cores and veneering ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2011;3:221-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Fischer J, Grohmann P, Stawarczyk B. Effect of zirconia surface treatments on the shear strength of zirconia/veneering ceramic composites. Dent Mater J 2008;27:448-54.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Mater 2006;22:857-63.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Aboushelib MN, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:984-91.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Guazzato M, Albakry M, Quach L, Swain MV. Influence of surface and heat treatments on the flexural strength of a glass-infiltrated alumina/zirconia-reinforced dental ceramic. Dent Mater 2005;21:454-63.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Celebi N, Yuzugullu B, Canay S, Yucel U. Effect of polymerization methods on the residual monomer level of acrylic resin denture base polymers. Polym Adv Technol 2008;19: 201-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Vasconcelos LR, Consani RL, Mesquita MF, Sinhoreti MA. Effect of chemical and microwave disinfection on the surface microhardness of acrylic resin denture teeth. J Prosthodont 2013;22:298-303.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Kim HJ, Lim HP, Park YJ, Vang MS. Effect of zirconia surface treatments on the shear bond strength of veneering ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:315-22.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 DeHoff PH, Anusavice KJ, Wang Z. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the shear bond test. Dent Mater 1995;11:126-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Cheung KC, Darvell BW. Sintering of dental porcelain: effect of time and temperature on appearance and porosity. Dent Mater 2002;18:163-73.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Craig RG, Powers JM, Wataha JC. Dental materials: properties and manuplation. 8th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2004, p.578-80.
35 Sobrinho LC, Cattell MJ, Glover RH, Knowles JC. Investigation of the dry and wet fatigue properties of three all-ceramic crown systems. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:255-62.