Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.341

Focal adhesion linker proteins expression of fibroblast related to adhesion in response to different transmucosal abutment surfaces  

Moon, Yeon-Hee (Dental Science Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Yoon, Mi-Kyeong (Dental Science Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Moon, Jung-Sun (Dental Science Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Kang, Jee-Hae (Dental Science Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Kim, Sun-Hun (Dental Science Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Yang, Hong-Seo (Dental Science Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Kim, Min-Seok (Dental Science Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.5, no.3, 2013 , pp. 341-350 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. To evaluate adherence of human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) to transmucosal abutment of dental implant with different surface conditions with time and to investigate the roles of focal adhesion linker proteins (FALPs) involved in HGFs adhesion to abutment surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Morphologies of cultured HGFs on titanium and ceramic discs with different surface were observed by scanning electron microscopy. Biocompatibility and focal adhesion were evaluated by ultrasonic wave application and cell viability assay. FALPs expression levels were assessed by RT-PCR and western blot. RESULTS. There seemed to be little difference in biocompatibility and adhesion strength of HGFs depending on the surface conditions and materials. In all experimental groups, the number of cells remaining on the disc surface after ultrasonic wave application increased more than 2 times at 3 days after seeding compared to 1-day cultured cells and this continued until 7 days of culture. FALPs expression levels, especially of vinculin and paxillin, also increased in 5-day cultured cells compared to 1-day cultured fibroblasts on the disc surface. CONCLUSION. These results might suggest that the strength of adhesion of fibroblasts to transmucosal abutment surfaces increases with time and it seemed to be related to expressions of FALPs.
Keywords
Transmucosal abutment; Focal adhesion linker proteins; Gingival fibroblast; Adhesion;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, Schraub DM, Simpson J, Lankford J Jr, Dean DD, Cochran DL, Boyan BD. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:389-401.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, Cochran DL, Simpson J, Dean DD, Boyan BD. Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;32:55-63.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Batzer R, Liu Y, Cochran DL, Szmuckler-Moncler S, Dean DD, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. Prostaglandins mediate the effects of titanium surface roughness on MG63 osteoblast-like cells and alter cell responsiveness to 1 alpha,25-(OH)2D3. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;41:489-96.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Lossdorfer S, Schwartz Z, Wang L, Lohmann CH, Turner JD, Wieland M, Cochran DL, Boyan BD. Microrough implant surface topographies increase osteogenesis by reducing osteoclast formation and activity. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004; 70:361-9.
5 Kononen M, Hormia M, Kivilahti J, Hautaniemi J, Thesleff I. Effect of surface processing on the attachment, orientation, and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts on titanium. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:1325-41.   DOI
6 Grossner-Schreiber B, Herzog M, Hedderich J, Duck A, Hannig M, Griepentrog M. Focal adhesion contact formation by fibroblasts cultured on surface-modified dental implants: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:736-45.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Park J, Bauer S, von der Mark K, Schmuki P. Nanosize and vitality: $TiO_2$ nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett 2007;7:1686-91.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Park J, Bauer S, Schlegel KA, Neukam FW, von der Mark K, Schmuki P. $TiO_2$ nanotube surfaces: 15 nm-an optimal length scale of surface topography for cell adhesion and differentiation. Small 2009;5:666-71.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Meredith DO, Eschbach L, Wood MA, Riehle MO, Curtis AS, Richards RG. Human fibroblast reactions to standard and electropolished titanium and Ti-6Al-7Nb, and electropolished stainless steel. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;75:541-55.
10 Derhami K, Wolfaardt JF, Wennerberg A, Scott PG. Quantifying the adherence of fibroblasts to titanium and its enhancement by substrate-attached material. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;52:315-22.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Groessner-Schreiber B, Neubert A, Müller WD, Hopp M, Griepentrog M, Lange KP. Fibroblast growth on surfacemodified dental implants: an in vitro study. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;64:591-9.
12 Reyes CD, García AJ. A centrifugation cell adhesion assay for high-throughput screening of biomaterial surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;67:328-33.
13 Hunter A, Archer CW, Walker PS, Blunn GW. Attachment and proliferation of osteoblasts and fibroblasts on biomaterials for orthopaedic use. Biomaterials 1995;16:287-95.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Richards RG, Stiffanic M, Owen GR, Riehle M, Ap Gwynn I, Curtis AS. Immunogold labelling of fibroblast focal adhesion sites visualised in fixed material using scanning electron microscopy, and living, using internal reflection microscopy. Cell Biol Int 2001;25:1237-49.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Grover A, Rosentraus MJ, Sterman B, Snook ME, Adamson ED. An adhesion-defective variant of F9 embryonal carcinoma cells fails to differentiate into visceral endoderm. Dev Biol 1987;120:1-11.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Rodriguez Fernandez JL, Geiger B, Salomon D, Ben-Ze'ev A. Overexpression of vinculin suppresses cell motility in BALB/c 3T3 cells. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 1992;22:127-34.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Rodriguez Fernandez JL, Geiger B, Salomon D, Ben-Ze'ev A. Suppression of vinculin expression by antisense transfection confers changes in cell morphology, motility, and anchoragedependent growth of 3T3 cells. J Cell Biol 1993;122:1285-94.   DOI
18 Alenghat FJ, Fabry B, Tsai KY, Goldmann WH, Ingber DE. Analysis of cell mechanics in single vinculin-deficient cells using a magnetic tweezer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000;277:93-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Turner CE. Paxillin and focal adhesion signalling. Nat Cell Biol 2000;2:e231-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Brown MC, Turner CE. Paxillin: adapting to change. Physiol Rev 2004;84:1315-39.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the peri-implant mucosa: Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontal 1996;23:971-3.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Palma-Carrio C, Balaguer-Martinez J, Penarrocha-Oltra D, Penarrocha-Diago M. Irritative and sensory disturbances in oral implantology. Literature review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16:e1043-6.
23 Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, Marinello CP, Liljenberg B, Thomsen P. The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:81-90.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Listgarten MA, Buser D, Steinemann SG, Donath K, Lang NP, Weber HP. Light and transmission electron microscopy of the intact interfaces between non-submerged titaniumcoated epoxy resin implants and bone or gingiva. J Dent Res 1992;71:364-71.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Ambrose EJ. The movements of fibrocytes. Exp Cell Res 1961;8:54-73.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Burridge K, Fath K, Kelly T, Nuckolls G, Turner C. Focal adhesions: transmembrane junctions between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. Annu Rev Cell Biol 1988;4:487-525.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Hynes RO. Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell 2002;110:673-87.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Owen GR, Meredith DO, ap Gwynn I, Richards RG. Focal adhesion quantification - a new assay of material biocompatibility? Review. Eur Cell Mater 2005;9:85-96.
29 An N, Rausch-fan X, Wieland M, Matejka M, Andrukhov O, Schedle A. Initial attachment, subsequent cell proliferation/ viability and gene expression of epithelial cells related to attachment and wound healing in response to different titanium surfaces. Dent Mater 2012;28:1207-14.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Anselme K, Bigerelle M, Noel B, Dufresne E, Judas D, Iost A, Hardouin P. Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with various surface roughnesses. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;49:155-66.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Boyan BD, Lohmann CH, Dean DD, Sylvia VL, Cochran DL, Schwartz Z. Mechanisms involved in osteoblast response to implant surface morphology. Annual Rev Mater Res 2001;31:357-71.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Garrod DR. Cell to cell and cell to matrix adhesion. BMJ 1993;306:703-5.   DOI
33 Giancotti FG, Ruoslahti E. Integrin signaling. Science 1999; 285:1028-32.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Raisanen L, Kononen M, Juhanoja J, Varpavaara P, Hautaniemi J, Kivilahti J, Hormia M. Expression of cell adhesion complexes in epithelial cells seeded on biomaterial surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;49:79-87.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Biggs MJ, Richards RG, Gadegaard N, Wilkinson CD, Dalby MJ. Regulation of implant surface cell adhesion: characterization and quantification of S-phase primary osteoblast adhesions on biomimetic nanoscale substrates. J Orthop Res 2007;25:273-82.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Arvidson K, Fartash B, Hilliges M, Kondell PA. Histological characteristics of peri-implant mucosa around Brånemark and single-crystal sapphire implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:1-10.   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Glantz PO, Lindhe J. The mucosal attachment at different abutments. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:721-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Craig RG, Hanks CT. Cytotoxicity of experimental casting alloys evaluated by cell culture tests. J Dent Res 1990;69:1539-42.   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Li D, Ferguson SJ, Beutler T, Cochran DL, Sittig C, Hirt HP, Buser D. Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;60:325-32.   DOI   ScienceOn