Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.296

Effect of polishing and glazing on the color and spectral distribution of monolithic zirconia  

Kim, Hee-Kyung (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Kim, Sung-Hun (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Lee, Jai-Bong (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Han, Jung-Suk (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Yeo, In-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.5, no.3, 2013 , pp. 296-304 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of polishing and glazing on the color and spectral distribution of monolithic zirconia. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty-five monolithic zirconia specimens ($16.3mm{\times}16.4mm{\times}2.0mm$) were fabricated and divided into 5 groups according to the number of A2-coloring liquid applications (Group I to V). Each group was divided into 3 subgroups according to the method of surface treatments (n=3): N: no treatment; P: polishing; G: glazing. Color and spectral distribution of five different areas of each specimen were measured according to CIELAB color space in the reflectance mode relative to the standard illuminant D65 on a reflection spectrophotometer. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD test, Pearson correlation and regression analysis (${\alpha}$=.05). RESULTS. There was a significant difference in CIE $L^*$ between Subgroup N and P, and in CIE $b^*$ between Subgroup P and G in each group. Spectral reflectance generally decreased in Subgroup P and G in comparison with Subgroup N. Color differences between Subgroup P and G were within the perceptibility threshold (${\Delta}E{^*}_{ab}$ < 3.7) in most groups. Highly significant correlation was found between CIE $b^*$ and each subgroups as the number of coloring liquid applications increased ($R^2$ >0.88, P<.001). CONCLUSION. A perceptible color difference can be detected after polishing of monolithic zirconia. Polishing decreases the lightness, and glazing also decreases the lightness, but increases the yellowness of monolithic zirconia.
Keywords
Zirconia-based ceramic; Color; Dental polishing; Surface properties;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Weinstein M, Katz S, Weinstein AB. Fused porcelain-to-metal teeth. US patent No 3052, 982. 1962.
2 Pröbster L, Diehl J. Slip-casting alumina ceramics for crown and bridge restorations. Quintessence Int 1992;23:25-31.
3 Vult von Steyern P, Carlson P, Nilner K. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures designed according to the DC-Zirkon technique. A 2-year clinical study. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:180-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Augthun M, Spiekermann H. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:231-8.
5 Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M. Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:641-52.
6 Ha SR, Kim SH, Han JS, Yoo SH, Jeong SC, Lee JB, Yeo IS. The influence of various core designs on stress distribution in the veneered zirconia crown: a finite element analysis study. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:187-97.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Beuer F, Schweiger J, Eichberger M, Kappert HF, Gernet W, Edelhoff D. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings-a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2009;25:121-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Mater 2006;22:857-63.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part 3: double veneer technique. J Prosthodont 2008;17:9-13.
10 Wiskott HWA. Fixed prosthodontics: principles and clinics. London; Quintessence publishing Co. Ltd; 2011. p. 670-1.
11 Klausner LH, Cartwright CB, Charbeneau GT. Polished versus autoglazed porcelain surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47: 157-62.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Brewer JD, Garlapo DA, Chipps EA, Tedesco LA. Clinical discrimination between autoglazed and polished porcelain surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:631-4.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Scurria MS, Powers JM. Surface roughness of two polished ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:174-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Kim IJ, Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Effect of surface topography on the color of dental porcelain. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003;14:405-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Sarac D, Sarac YS, Yuzbasioglu E, Bal S. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:122-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Effect of surface conditions on the color of dental resin composites. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;63:657-63.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Yilmaz C, Korkmaz T, Demirkoprulu H, Ergün G, Ozkan Y. Color stability of glazed and polished dental porcelains. J Prosthodont 2008;17:20-4.
18 Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE). Colorimetry, CIE 015. 3rd ed. Vienna: CIE Central Bureau; 2004.
19 Obregon A, Goodkind RJ, Schwabacher WB. Effects of opaque and porcelain surface texture on the color of ceramometal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:330-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Chung KH. Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites. Dent Mater 1994;10: 325-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Knispel G. Factors affecting the process of color matching restorative materials to natural teeth. Quintessence Int 1991; 22:525-31.
22 Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88:4-9.
23 Baldissara P, Llukacej A, Ciocca L, Valandro FL, Scotti R. Translucency of zirconia copings made with different CAD/ CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104:6-12.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Rosenstiel SF, Baiker MA, Johnston WM. Comparison of glazed and polished dental porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1989; 2:524-9.
25 Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 1989; 68:819-22.   DOI   ScienceOn