1 |
Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Chee W, Felton DA, Johnson PF, Sullivan DY. Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: which is better? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:137-41.
|
3 |
Taylor TD, Agar JR, Vogiatzi T. Implant prosthodontics: current perspective and future directions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:66-75.
|
4 |
Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:719-28.
|
5 |
Vigolo P, Givani A, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:260-5.
|
6 |
Weber HP, Sukotjo C. Does the type of implant prosthesis affect outcomes in the partially edentulous patient? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:140-72.
|
7 |
Michalakis KX, Pissiotis AL, Hirayama H. Cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:545-9.
|
8 |
Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Bogacki MT, Tietge JD. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:737-41.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Mehl C, Harder S, Wolfar t M, Kern M, Wolfar t S. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1304-11.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Schneider RL. Evaluation of the retention of castings to endosseous dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:73-8.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2006. p. 229.
|
12 |
Covey DA, Kent DK, St Germain HA Jr, Koka S. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:344-8.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Akca K, Iplikcioglu H, Cehreli MC. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:536-42.
|
14 |
Juntavee N, Millstein PL. Effect of surface roughness and cement space on crown retention. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68: 482-6.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Tuntiprawon M. Effect of tooth surface roughness on marginal seating and retention of complete metal crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:142-7.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Oilo G, Jorgensen KD. The influence of surface roughness on the retentive ability of two dental luting cements. J Oral Rehabil 1978;5:377-89.
DOI
|
17 |
Felton DA, Kanoy BE, White JT. The effect of surface roughness of crown preparations on retention of cemented castings. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:292-6.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Grasso CA, Caluori DM, Goldstein GR, Hittelman E. In vivo evaluation of three cleansing techniques for prepared abutment teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:437-41.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Ayad MF, Rosenstiel SF, Salama M. Influence of tooth surface roughness and type of cement on retention of complete cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:116-21.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Ramp MH, Dixon DL, Ramp LC, Breeding LC, Barber LL. Tensile bond strengths of provisional luting agents used with an implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:510-4.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Erkut S, Kucukesmen HC, Eminkahyagil N, Imirzalioglu P, Karabulut E. Influence of previous provisional cementation on the bond strength between two definitive resin-based lut-ing and dentin bonding agents and human dentin. Oper Dent 2007;32:84-93.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Influence of eugenol-containing temporary cement on efficacy of dentin-bonding systems. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107:65-9.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Lingard GL, Davies EH, von Fraunhofer JA. The interaction between lining materials and composite resin restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 1981;8:121-9.
DOI
|
24 |
Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr, Harcourt JK. The influence of various cavity bases on the micro-hardness of composites. Aust Dent J 1982;27:291-5.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Kanakuri K, Kawamoto Y, Matsumura H. Influence of temporary cement remnant and surface cleaning method on bond strength to dentin of a composite luting system. J Oral Sci 2005;47:9-13.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Koka S, Ewoldsen NO, Dana CL, Beatty MW. The effect of cementing agent and technique on the retention of a CeraOne gold cylinder: a pilot study. Implant Dent 1995;4: 32-5.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Dudley JE, Richards LC, Abbott JR. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments. Aust Dent J 2008; 53:332-9.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Al-Zain SA. The effect of different metal cleaning methods on retention of cast crowns. Egypt Dent J 2006;52:2087-92.
|
29 |
Button GL, Barnes RF, Moon PC. Surface preparation and shear bond strength of the casting-cement interface. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:34-8.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
Cobb DS, Vargas MA, Fridrich TA, Bouschlicher MR. Metal surface treatment: characterization and effect on compositeto- metal bond strength. Oper Dent 2000;25:427-33.
|
31 |
Mosharraf R. A simple method for cleaning zinc oxide-eugenol provisional cement residues from the intaglio surface of casting restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:200.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
32 |
Homiak AW, Cook PA, DeBoer J. Effect of hygiene instrumentation on titanium abutments: a scanning electron microscopy study. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:364-9.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
33 |
Speelman JA, Collaert B, Klinge B. Evaluation of different methods to clean titanium abutments. A scanning electron microscopic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:120-7.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
34 |
Brookshire FV, Nagy WW, Dhuru VB, Ziebert GJ, Chada S. The qualitative effects of various types of hygiene instrumentation on commercially pure titanium and titanium alloy implant abutments: an in vitro and scanning electron microscope study. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:286-94.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
35 |
Mengel R, Buns CE, Mengel C, Flores-de-Jacoby L. An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:91-6.
|
36 |
Bain CA. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of various implant- cleaning instruments. Quintessence Int 1998;29:423-7.
|
37 |
Razzoog ME, Koka S. In vitro analysis of the effects of two air-abrasive prophylaxis systems and inlet air pressure on the surface of titanium abutment cylinders. J Prosthodont 1994; 3:103-7.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
38 |
Augthun M, Tinschert J, Huber A. In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces. J Periodontol 1998;69:857-64.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
39 |
Kreisler M, Kohnen W, Christoffers AB, Gotz H, Jansen B, Duschner H, d'Hoedt B. In vitro evaluation of the biocompatibility of contaminated implant surfaces treated with an Er : YAG laser and an air powder system. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:36-43.
|
40 |
Dario LJ. Implant angulation and position and screw or cement retention: clinical guidelines. Implant Dent 1996;5: 101-4.
DOI
ScienceOn
|