Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.179

Evaluation of the marginal and internal gap of metal-ceramic crown fabricated with a selective laser sintering technology: two- and three-dimensional replica techniques  

Kim, Ki-Baek (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, Korea University)
Kim, Jae-Hong (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, Korea University)
Kim, Woong-Chul (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, Korea University)
Kim, Hae-Young (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, Korea University)
Kim, Ji-Hwan (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, Korea University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.5, no.2, 2013 , pp. 179-186 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. One of the most important factors in evaluating the quality of fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) is their gap. The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal and internal gap of two different metal-ceramic crowns, casting and selective laser sintering (SLS), before and after porcelain firing. Furthermore, this study evaluated whether metal-ceramic crowns made using the SLS have the same clinical acceptability as crowns made by the traditional casting. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The 10 study models were produced using stone. The 20 specimens were produced using the casting and the SLS methods; 10 samples were made in each group. After the core gap measurements, 10 metal-ceramic crowns in each group were finished using the conventional technique of firing porcelain. The gap of the metal-ceramic crowns was measured. The marginal and internal gaps were measured by two-dimensional and three-dimensional replica techniques, respectively. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and nonparametric ANCOVA were used for statistical analysis (${\alpha}$=.05). RESULTS. In both groups, the gap increased after completion of the metal-ceramic crown compared to the core. In all measured areas, the gap of the metal cores and metal-ceramic crowns produced by the SLS was greater than that of the metal cores and metal-ceramic crowns produced using the casting. Statistically significant differences were found between cast and SLS (metal cores and metal-ceramic crown). CONCLUSION. Although the gap of the FDPs produced by the SLS was greater than that of the FDPs produced by the conventional casting in all measured areas, none exceeded the clinically acceptable range.
Keywords
CAD-CAM; Marginal adaptation; Metal ceramics restorations; Replica techniques;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bonate PL. Analysis of pretest-posttest designs. Boca Raton, FL; Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2000. p. 98-100.
2 White SN, Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Caputo AA. Microleakage of new crown and fixed partial denture luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:156-161.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Moldovan O, Luthardt RG, Corcodel N, Rudolph H. Threedimensional fit of CAD/CAM-made zirconia copings. Dent Mater 2011;27:1273-1278.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G. Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns--validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:116-122.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Rahme HY, Tehini GE, Adib SM, Ardo AS, Rifai KT. In vitro evaluation of the «replica technique» in the measurement of the fit of Procera crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9: 25-32.
6 Buchanan WT, Svare CW, Turner KA. The effect of repeated firings and strength on marginal distortion in two ceramometal systems. J Prosthet Dent 1981;45:502-506.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Shokry TE, Attia M, Mosleh I, Elhosary M, Hamza T, Shen C. Effect of metal selection and porcelain firing on the marginal accuracy of titanium-based metal ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:45-52.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Ostlund LE. Cavity design and mathematics: their effect on gaps at the margins of cast restorations. Oper Dent 1985; 10:122-137.
9 Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:478-484.
10 McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131: 107-111.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Lakhani SA, Ercoli C, Moss ME, Graser GN, Tallents RH. Influence of cold working and thermal treatment on the fit of implant-supported metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:159-169.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Pierce LH, Goodkind RJ. A status report of possible risks of base metal alloys and their components. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:234-238.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Wassell RW, Walls AW, Steele JG. Crowns and extra-coronal restorations: materials selection. Br Dent J 2002;192:199-202; 205-211.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Vigolo P, Fonzi F. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconiumoxide- based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles. J Prosthodont 2008;17:621-626.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Pak HS, Han JS, Lee JB, Kim SH, Yang JH. Influence of porcelain veneering on the marginal fit of Digident and Lava CAD/CAM zirconia ceramic crowns. J Adv Prosthodont 2010; 2:33-38.   DOI
16 Foster LV. Failed conventional bridge work from general dental practice: clinical aspects and treatment needs of 142 cases. Br Dent J 1990;168:199-201.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Beuer F, Aggstaller H, Edelhoff D, Gernet W, Sorensen J. Marginal and internal fits of fixed dental prostheses zirconia retainers. Dent Mater 2009;25:94-102.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Groten M, Axmann D, Pröbster L, Weber H. Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in-vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83:40-49.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Kohorst P, Brinkmann H, Dittmer MP, Borchers L, Stiesch M. Influence of the veneering process on the marginal fit of zirconia fixed dental prostheses. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:283-291   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G. Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns--validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:116-122.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick JD, Chappell RP. Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to-metal and two types of ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:26-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Luthardt RG, Bornemann G, Lemelson S, Walter MH, Hüls A. An innovative method for evaluation of the 3-D internal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated after direct optical versus indirect laser scan digitizing. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17:680-685.
23 Pelekanos S, Koumanou M, Koutayas SO, Zinelis S, Eliades G. Micro-CT evaluation of the marginal fit of different In- Ceram alumina copings. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009;4:278-292.
24 Ucar Y, Akova T, Akyil MS, Brantley WA. Internal fit evaluation of crowns prepared using a new dental crown fabrication technique: laser-sintered Co-Cr crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:253-259.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Örtorp A, Jonsson D, Mouhsen A, Vult von Steyern P. The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2011;27:356-363.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Holmes J R , Bayne SC, Holland GA, S u l i k WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:405-408.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Fonseca JC, Henriques GE, Sobrinho LC, de Góes MF. Stress-relieving and porcelain firing cycle influence on marginal fit of commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum- vanadium copings. Dent Mater 2003;19:686-691.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009; 28:44-56.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Akova T, Ucar Y, Tukay A, Balkaya MC, Brantley WA. Comparison of the bond strength of laser-sintered and cast base metal dental alloys to porcelain. Dent Mater 2008; 24:1400-1404.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Campbell SD, Pelletier LB. Thermal cycling distortion of metal ceramics: Part I--Metal collar width. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:603-608.   DOI   ScienceOn