Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.172

Evaluation on the efficacy and safety of calcium metaphosphate coated fixture  

Cho, In-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Lee, Jae-Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Song, Young-Gyun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Kim, Young-Mi (Dankook University Dental Hospital)
Jeon, So-Young (Dankook University Dental Hospital)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.5, no.2, 2013 , pp. 172-178 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to assess the difference in efficacy between calcium metaphosphate (CMP)-coated implant fixtures and conventional resorbable blasted media (RBM) processed implant fixtures. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This study targeted 50 implants from 44 patients who visited Dankook University Dental Hospital. Implantations were done separately for RBM treated and CMP-coated implants, although their design was the same. Calcium metaphosphate has a quicker biodegradation process through hydrolysis compared to other phosphate calcium groups. For the first year of the implantation, the resorption volume of marginal bone analyzed via radiography and perio-test value were measured, under the check plan. Their analyses were composed of a non-inferiority trials test. A 95% level of reliability was used. RESULTS. In the comparative analysis of the resorption volume of marginal bone and the perio-test value, no statistically significant difference was found between the CMP-coated implants and RBM implants. CONCLUSION. One year after the implant placement, CMP-coated implants were found not to be inferior to the conventional RBM implants.
Keywords
Calcium metaphoaphate (CMP); Implant surface; Implant stability;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Buser D, Brägger U, Lang NP, Nyman S. Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1:22-32.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Noack N, Willer J, Hoffmann J. Long-term results after placement of dental implants: longitudinal study of 1,964 implants over 16 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:748-755.
3 Roos J, Sennerby L, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Grondahl K, Albrektsson T. A qualitative and quantitative method for evaluating implant success: a 5-year retrospective analysis of the Brånemark implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:504-514.
4 Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses: Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. In: LekholmU, Zarb GA. editors. Patient selection. Chicago; Quintessence; 1985. p. 199-209.
5 Sekine H, Komiyama Y, Hotta H, Yoshida K. Mobility characteristics and tactile sensitivity of osseointegrated fixturesupporting systems. In: Van Steeberghe D, editors. Tissue intergration in oral maxillofacial reconstruction. Amsterdam; Elsevier; 1986. p. 236-332.
6 Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch E Jr, Land NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987;2: 145-151.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Curtis DA, Sharma A, Finzen FC, Kao RT. Occlusal considerations for implant restorations in the partially edentulous patient. J Calif Dent Assoc 2000;28:771-779.
8 Weinberg LA. Reduction of implant loading with therapeutic biomechanics. Implant Dent 1998;7:277-285.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Schulte W, d'Hoedt B, Lukas D, Maunz M, Steppeler M. Periotest for measuring periodontal characteristics--correlation with periodontal bone loss. J Periodontal Res 1992;27: 184-190.   DOI
10 Faulkner MG, Giannitsios D, Lipsett AW, Wolfaardt JF. The use and abuse of the Periotest for 2-piece implant/abutment systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:486-494.
11 Wyatt CC, Zarb GA. Bone level changes proximal to oral implants supporting fixed partial prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:162-168.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Block MS, Kent JN, Kay JF. Evaluation of hydroxylapatitecoated titanium dental implants in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987;45:601-607.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Schwartz-Arad D, Yaniv Y, Levin L, Kaffe I. A radiographic evaluation of cervical bone loss associated with immediate and delayed implants placed for fixed restorations in edentulous jaws. J Periodontol 2004;75:652-657.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Shin HS, Kim YS, Shin SW. Effects of various surface treatments for titanium on surface micro roughness, static wettability, fibronectin adsorption. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2006;44:443-454.
15 Chen J, Tong W, Cao Y, Feng J, Zhang X. Effect of atmosphere on phase transformation in plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings during heat treatment. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;34:15-20.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Darimont GL, Cloots R, Heinen E, Seidel L, Legrand R. In vivo behaviour of hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium implants: a quantitative study in the rabbit. Biomaterials 2002; 23:2569-2575.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Yamashita K, Kanazawa T. Materials Science Monographs: Inorganic phosphate materials. Tokyo; Elsevier; 1989. p. 221-246
18 Lee YM, Seol YJ, Lim YT, Kim S, Han SB, Rhyu IC, Baek SH, Heo SJ, Choi JY, Klokkevold PR, Chung CP. Tissueengineered growth of bone by marrow cell transplantation using porous calcium metaphosphate matrices. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;54:216-223.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Park EK, Lee YE, Choi JY, Oh SH, Shin HI, Kim KH, Kim SY, Kim S. Cellular biocompatibility and stimulatory effects of calcium metaphosphate on osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived stromal cells. Biomaterials 2004;25:3403-3411.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 You CK, Yeo IS, Kim MD, Eom TK, Lee JY, Kim SK. Characterization and in vivo evaluation of calcium phosphate coated cp-titanium by dip-spin method. Curr Appl Phys 2005;5:501-506.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Roos J, Sennerby L, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Gröndahl K, Albrektsson T. A qualitative and quantitative method for evaluating implant success: a 5-year retrospective analysis of the Brånemark implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:504-514.
22 Yeo IS, Han JS, Yang JH. Biomechanical and histomorphometric study of dental implants with different surface characteristics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008; 87:303-311
23 The Korean academy of oral and maxillofacial implantology. Atlas of implant terminology. 1st ed. Seoul; Deahan Publishing; 2003. p. 15-16.
24 Kim YK, Park HS, Jung SM. Implant problem solution. Vol 2: Surgery and Prosthetic problem solution. 1st ed. Seoul; Deahan Publishing; 2003. p. 9-10.
25 Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1:33-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-172.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
28 Albrektsson T, Sennerby L. State of the art in oral implants. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:474-481.   DOI
29 Eckert SE, Parein A, Myshin HL, Padilla JL. Validation of dental implant systems through a review of literature supplied by system manufacturers. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:271-279   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-170.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Carlsson L, Röstlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T. Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:21-24.