Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.4.227

Development of implant loading device for animal study about various loading protocol: a pilot study  

Yoon, Joon-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Park, Young-Bum (Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Cho, Yuna (Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Moon, Hong-Seok (Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Lee, Keun-Woo (Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Shim, June-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.4, no.4, 2012 , pp. 227-234 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. The aims of this pilot study were to introduce implant loading devices designed for animal study and to evaluate the validity of the load transmission ability of the loading devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Implant loading devices were specially designed and fabricated with two implant abutments and cast metal bars, and orthodontic expansion screw. In six Beagles, all premolars were extracted and two implants were placed in each side of the mandibles. The loading device was inserted two weeks after the implant placement. According to the loading protocol, the load was applied to the implants with different time and method, simulating early, progressive, and delayed loading. The implants were clinically evaluated and the loading devices were removed and replaced to the master cast, followed by stress-strain analysis. Descriptive statistics of remained strain (${\mu}{\varepsilon}$) was evaluated after repeating three cycles of the loading device activation. Statistic analysis was performed using nonparametric, independent t-test with 5% significance level and Friedman's test was also used for verification. RESULTS. The loading devices were in good action. However, four implants in three Beagles showed loss of osseointegration. In stress-strain analysis, loading devices showed similar amount of increase in the remained strain after applying 1-unit load for three times. CONCLUSION. Specialized design of the implant loading device was introduced. The loading device applied similar amount of loads near the implant after each 1-unit loading. However, the direction of the loads was not parallel to the long axis of the implants as predicted before the study.
Keywords
Dental Implants; Osseointegration; Dental stress analysis; Immediate dental implant loading; Animal experimentation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Romanos G, Froum S, Hery C, Cho SC, Tarnow D. Survival rate of immediately vs delayed loaded implants: analysis of the current literature. J Oral Implantol 2010;36:315-24.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Romanos GE, Nentwig GH. Immediate versus delayed functional loading of implants in the posterior mandible: a 2-year prospective clinical study of 12 consecutive cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:459-69.
3 Hoshaw SJ, Brunski JB, Cochran GVB. Mechanical loading of Branemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:345-60.
4 Rocci A, Martignoni M, Burgos PM, Gottlow J, Sennerby L. Histology of retrieved immediately and early loaded oxidized implants: light microscopic observations after 5 to 9 months of loading in the posterior mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:88-98.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Frost HM. Wolff's Law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod 1994;64:175-88.
6 Binon PP, Sullivan DY. Provisional fixed restorations technique for osseointegrated implants. J Calif Dent Assoc 1990;18:23-30.
7 Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1999, p. 595-608.
8 Appleton RS, Nummikoski PV, Pigno MA, Cronin RJ, Chung KH. A radiographic assessment of progressive loading on bone around single osseointegrated implants in the posterior maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:161-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Roberts WE. Bone tissue interface. J Dent Educ 1988;52:804-9.
10 Jayme SJ, de Oliveira RR, Muglia VA, Novaes AB Jr, Ribeiro RF. The effects of different loading times on the bone response around dental implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:473-81.
11 Gostovic AS, Todorovic A, Lazic V, Todorovic A, Milinkovic I, Lekovic V. Immediate implant loading with fixed dental restorations- an animal model study. Vojnosanit Pregl 2012;69:181-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Rismanchian M, Attar BM, Razavi SM, Shamsabad AN, Rezaei M. Dental implants immediate loading versus the standard 2-staged protocol: an experimental study in dogs. J Oral Implantol 2012;38:3-10.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Rismanchian M, Bajoghli F, Gholamreza T, Razavi M. Clinical, histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of early loaded implants (an animal study). J Oral Implantol 2012 Jan 3.
14 Testori T, Wiseman L, Woolfe S, Porter SS. A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: four-year interim report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:193-200.
15 Cochran DL, Morton D, Weber HP. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding loading protocols for endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:109-13.
16 Ledermann P. Bar-prosthetic management of the edentulous mandible by means of plasma-coated implantation with titanium screws. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1979;34:907-11.
17 Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. Influence of initial implant mobility on the integration of titanium implants. An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:120-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Bone reactions adjacent to titanium implants subjected to static load. A study in the dog (I). Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:1-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Tanck E, Homminga J, van Lenthe GH, Huiskes R. Increase in bone volume fraction precedes architectural adaptation in growing bone. Bone 2001;28:650-4.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Turner CH. Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli. Bone 1998;23:399-407.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Brunski JB. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface. Clin Mater 1992;10:153-201.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Szmukler-Moncler S, Piattelli A, Favero GA, Dubruille JH. Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in dental implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:12-25.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Mishra M, Ozawa S, Masuda T, Yoshioka F, Tanaka Y. Finite element study on the effect of abutment length and material on implant bone interface against dynamic loading. J Adv Prosthodont 2011;3:140-4.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Sohn BS, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK, Lee SY. Strain of implants depending on occlusion types in mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses. J Adv Prosthodont 2011;3:1-9.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Jemt T, Book K. Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:620-5.
26 Duyck J, Ronold HJ, Van Oosterwyck H, Naert I, Vander Sloten J, Ellingsen JE. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:207-18.   DOI   ScienceOn