Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2011.3.3.140

Finite element study on the effect of abutment length and material on implant bone interface against dynamic loading  

Mishra, Manish (Department of Removal Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aichi Gakuin University)
Ozawa, Shogo (Department of Removal Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aichi Gakuin University)
Masuda, Tatsuhiko (Department of Removal Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aichi Gakuin University)
Yoshioka, Fumi (Department of Removal Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aichi Gakuin University)
Tanaka, Yoshinobu (Department of Removal Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aichi Gakuin University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.3, no.3, 2011 , pp. 140-144 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. Finite element study on the effect of abutment length and material on implant bone interface against dynamic loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two dimensional finite element models of cylinderical implant, abutments and bone made by titanium or polyoxymethylene were simulated with the aid of Marc/Mentat software. Each model represented bone, implant and titanium or polyoxymethylene abutment. Model 1: Implant with 3 mm titanium abutment, Model 2: Implant with 2 mm polyoxymethylene resilient material abutment, Model 3: Implant with 3 mm polyoxymethylene resilient material abutment and Model 4: Implant with 4 mm polyoxymethylene resilient material abutment. A vertical load of 11 N was applied with a frequency of 2 cycles/sec. The stress distribution pattern and displacement at the junction of cortical bone and implant was recorded. RESULTS. When Model 2, 3 and 4 are compared with Model 1, they showed narrowing of stress distribution pattern in the cortical bone as the height of the polyoxymethylene resilient material abutment increases. Model 2, 3 and 4 showed slightly less but similar displacement when compared to Model 1. CONCLUSION. Within the limitation of this study, we conclude that introduction of different height resilient material abutment with different heights i.e. 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm polyoxymethylene, does not bring about significant change in stress distribution pattern and displacement as compared to 3 mm Ti abutment. Clinically, with the application of resilient material abutment there is no significant change in stress distribution around implant-bone interface.
Keywords
Dental implant; Dynamic; Finite element analysis; Resilient material abutment; Polyoxymethylene; Bone-implant interface;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Holmes DC, Grigsby WR, Goel VK, Keller JC. Comparison of stress transmission in the IMZ implant system with polyoxymethylene or titanium intramobile element: a finite element stress analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7: 450-8.
2 McGlumphy EA, Campagni WV, Peterson LJ. A comparison of the stress transfer characteristics of a dental implant with a rigid or a resilient internal element. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:586-93.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 van Rossen IP, Braak LH, de Putter C, de Groot K. Stressabsorbing elements in dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64: 198-205.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Sato M, Kuboki T, Itasaka M, Kondo Y, Yamashita A. Stresstransfer characteristics of stress-absorbing elements in the IMZ implant system: Part 1. Stress around a freestanding single implant under static loading conditions. J Jpn Prosthodont Soc 1992;36:1102-10.   DOI
5 Haganman CR, Holmes DC, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Stanford CM. Deflection and stress distribution in three different IMZ abutment designs. J Prosthodont 1997;6:110-21.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Morton D, Stanford CM, Aquilino SA. Evaluation of resilient abutment components on measured strain using dynamic loading conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:46-51.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:843-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:585-98.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Oh TJ, Yoon J, Misch CE, Wang HL. The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science? J Periodontol 2002;73:322-33.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Kirsch A, Mentag PJ. The IMZ endosseous two phase implant system: a complete oral rehabilitation treatment concept. J Oral Implantol 1986;12:576-89.
11 Babbush CA, Kirsch A, Mentag PJ, Hill B. Intramobile cylinder (IMZ) two-stage osteointegrated implant system with the intramobile intramobile element (IME): part I. Its ratinale and procedure for use. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:203-16.
12 Achour T, Merdji A, Bachir BB, Serier B, Djebbar N. Stress distribution in dental implant with elastomeric stress barrier. Mater Design 2011;32:282-90.   DOI