Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2011.3.2.81

Initial bacterial adhesion on resin, titanium and zirconia in vitro  

Lee, Byung-Chul (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Jung, Gil-Yong (Interdisciplinary Program for Bioengineering, Seoul National University)
Kim, Dae-Joon (Department of Advanced Material Engineering, Sejong University)
Han, Jung-Suk (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.3, no.2, 2011 , pp. 81-84 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the adhesion of initial colonizer, Streptococcus sanguis, on resin, titanium and zirconia under the same surface polishing condition. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Specimens were prepared from Z-250, cp-Ti and 3Y-TZP and polished with $1 {\mu}m$ diamond paste. After coating with saliva, each specimen was incubated with Streptococcus sanguis. Scanning electron microscope, crystal violet staining and measurement of fluorescence intensity resulting from resazurin reduction were performed for quantifying the bacterial adhesion. RESULTS. Surface of resin composite was significantly rougher than that of titanium and zirconia, although all tested specimens are classified as smooth. The resin specimens showed lower value of contact angle compared with titanium and zirconia specimens, and had hydrophilic surfaces. The result of scanning electron microscopy demonstrated that bound bacteria were more abundant on resin in comparison with titanium and zirconia. When total biofilm mass determined by crystal violet, absorbance value of resin was significantly higher than that of titanium or zirconia. The result of relative fluorescence intensities also demonstrated that the highest fluorescence intensity was found on the surface of resin. Absorbance value and fluorescence intensity on titanium was not significantly different from those on zirconia. CONCLUSION. Resin specimens showed the roughest surface and have a significantly higher susceptibility to adhere Streptococcus sanguis than titanium and zirconia when surfaces of each specimen were polished under same condition. There was no significant difference in bacteria adhesion between titanium and zirconia in vitro.
Keywords
Biofilm; Resin; Titanium; Zirconia;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Al-Ahmad A, Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M, Faust J, Bachle M, Follo M, Wolkewitz M, Hannig C, Hellwig E, Carvalho C, Kohal R. Biofilm formation and composition on different implant materials in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010;95:101-9.
2 Puckett SD, Taylor E, Raimondo T, Webster TJ. The relationship between the nanostructure of titanium surfaces and bacterial attachment. Biomaterials 2010;31:706-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Subramani K, Jung RE, Molenberg A, Hammerle CH. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:616-26.
4 Busscher HJ, Rinastiti M, Siswomihardjo W, van der Mei HC. Biofilm formation on dental restorative and implant materials. J Dent Res 2010;89:657-65.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Scarano A, Piattelli M, Caputi S, Favero GA, Piattelli A. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study. J Periodontol 2004;75:292-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Auschill TM, Arweiler NB, Brecx M, Reich E, Sculean A, Netuschil L. The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110:48-53.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Pihlstrom BL, Michalowicz BS, Johnson NW. Periodontal diseases. Lancet 2005;366:1809-20.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Handel G, Burgers R. Surface characterization of dental ceramics and initial streptococcal adhesion in vitro. Dent Mater 2009;25:969-75.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007;35:819-26.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Ikeda M, Matin K, Nikaido T, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of surface characteristics on adherence of S. mutans biofilms to indirect resin composites. Dent Mater J 2007;26:915-23.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:1-14.
12 Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997;13:258-69.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Hojo K, Nagaoka S, Ohshima T, Maeda N. Bacterial interactions in dental biofilm development. J Dent Res 2009;88:982-90.   DOI
14 Filoche S, Wong L, Sissons CH. Oral biofilms: emerging concepts in microbial ecology. J Dent Res 2010;89:8-18.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Scheie AA, Petersen FC. The biofilm concept: consequences for future prophylaxis of oral diseases? Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2004;15:4-12.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Ono M, Nikaido T, Ikeda M, Imai S, Hanada N, Tagami J, Matin K. Surface properties of resin composite materials relative to biofilm formation. Dent Mater J 2007;26:613-22.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Li J, Helmerhorst EJ, Leone CW, Troxler RF, Yaskell T, Haffajee AD, Socransky SS, Oppenheim FG. Identification of early microbial colonizers in human dental biofilm. J Appl Microbiol 2004;97:1311-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:68-81.   DOI   ScienceOn