Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2011.3.1.16

The effect of denture base surface pretreatments on bond strengths of two long term resilient liners  

Kulkarni, Rahul Shyamrao (Department of Prosthodontics, Government Dental College & Hospital)
Parkhedkar, Rambhau (Department of Prosthodontics, Government Dental College & Hospital)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.3, no.1, 2011 , pp. 16-19 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. Purpose of this study was to evaluate effect of two surface treatments, sandblasting and monomer treatment, on tensile bond strength between two long term resilient liners and poly (methyl methacrylate) denture base resin. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two resilient liners Super-Soft and Molloplast-B were selected. Sixty acrylic resin (Trevalon) specimens with cross sectional area of $10{\times}10$ mm were prepared and divided into two groups of 30 specimens each. Each group was surface treated (n = 10) by sandblasting (250 ${\mu}$ alumina particles), monomer treatment (for 180 sec) and control (no surface treatment). Resilient liners were processed between 2 poly(methyl methacrylate) surfaces, in the dimensions of $10{\times}10{\times}3$ mm. Tensile strength was determined with Instron Universal testing machine, at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min; and the modes of failure (adhesive, cohesive or mixed) were recorded. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD test (${\alpha}$= 0.05). RESULTS. Monomer pretreatment of acrylic resin produced significantly higher bond strengths when compared to sandblasting and control for both resilient liners (P < .001). Sandblasting significantly decreased the bond strength for both the liners when compared to monomer pretreatment and control (P < .001). Mean bond strength of Super-Soft lined specimens was significantly higher than Molloplast-B in various surface treatment groups (P < .05). CONCLUSION. Surface pretreatment of the acrylic resin with monomer prior to resilient liner application is an effective method to increase bond strength between the base and soft liner. Sandblasting, on the contrary, is not recommended as it weakens the bond between the two.
Keywords
Resilient liners; Bond strength;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Brown D. Resilient soft liners and tissue conditioners. Br Dent J 1988;164:357-60.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Kawano F, Dootz ER, Koran A 3rd, Craig RG. Bond strength of six soft denture liners processed against polymerized and unpolymerized poly(methyl methacrylate). Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:178-82.
3 Al-Athel MS, Jagger RG, Jerolimov V. Bone strength of resilient lining materials to various denture base resins. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:167-70.
4 Kutay O. Comparison of tensile and peel bond strengths of resilient liners. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:525-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Craig RG, Gibbons P. Properties of resilient denture liners. J Am Dent Assoc 1961;63:382-90.   DOI
6 Amin WM, Fletcher AM, Ritchie GM. The nature of the interface between polymethyl methacrylate denture base materials and soft lining materials. J Dent 1981;9:336-46.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Jacobsen NL, Mitchell DL, Johnson DL, Holt RA. Lased and sandblasted denture base surface preparations affecting resilient liner bonding. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:153-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Sarac YS, Basoglu T, Ceylan GK, Saraç D, Yapici O. Effect of denture base surface pretreatment on microleakage of a siliconebased resilient liner. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:283-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Dootz ER, Koran A, Craig RG. Physical property comparison of 11 soft denture lining materials as a function of accelerated aging. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:114-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Khan Z, Martin J, Collard S. Adhesion characteristics of visible light-cured denture base material bonded to resilient lining materials. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:196-200.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Vallittu PK, Lassila VP, Lappalainen R. Wetting the repair surface with methyl methacrylate affects the transverse strength of repaired heat-polymerized resin. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:639-43.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Kulak-Ozkan Y, Sertgoz A, Gedik H. Effect of thermocycling on tensile bond strength of six silicone-based, resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:303-10.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 al-Athel MS, Jagger RG. Effect of test method on the bond strength of a silicone resilient denture lining material. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:535-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Kawano F, Dootz ER, Koran A 3rd, Craig RG. Comparison of bond strength of six soft denture liners to denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:368-71.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Bates JF, Smith DC. Evaluation of indirect resilient liners for dentures: Laboratory and clinical tests. J Am Dent Assoc 1965;70:344-53.   DOI
16 El-Hadary A, Drummond JL. Comparative study of water sorption, solubility, and tensile bond strength of two soft lining materials. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:356-61.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Anusavice KJ. Phillips' science of dental materials. 11th ed. Saunders; Elsevier; 2003. p. 750-1.
18 Sarac D, Sarac YS, Basoglu T, Yapici O, Yuzbasioglu E. The evaluation of microleakage and bond strength of a silicone-based resilient liner following denture base surface pretreatment. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:143-51.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Emmer TJ Jr, Emmer TJ Sr, Vaidynathan J, Vaidynathan TK. Bond strength of permanent soft denture liners bonded to the denture base. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:595-601.   DOI   ScienceOn