Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2010.2.3.92

Anthropometric analysis of maxillary anterior buccal bone of Korean adults using cone-beam CT  

Lee, Seung-Lok (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Kim, Hee-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Son, Mee-Kyoung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Chung, Chae-Heon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.2, no.3, 2010 , pp. 92-96 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the thickness of buccal and palatal alveolar bone and buccal bony curvature below root apex in maxillary anterior teeth of Korean adults using Cone-beam CT images. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The 3D image was reconstructed with dicom file obtained through CBCT from 20 - 39 year old Korean subjects (n = 20). The thickness of buccal and palatal plate, root diameter, the buccal bony curvature angle below root apex and the distance from root apex to the deepest point of buccal bony curvature were measured on maxillary anterior teeth area using OnDemand3D program. RESULTS. Mean thickness of buccal plate 3 mm below CEJ was $0.68{\pm}0.29\;mm$ at central incisor, $0.76{\pm}0.59\;mm$ at lateral incisor, and $1.07{\pm}0.80\;mm$ at canine. Mean thickness of palatal plate 3 mm below CEJ was $1.53{\pm}0.55\;mm$ of central incisor, $1.18{\pm}0.66\;mm$ of lateral incisor, $1.42{\pm}0.77\;mm$ of canine. Bucco-lingual diameter 3 mm below CEJ was $5.13{\pm}0.37\;mm$ of central incisor, $4.58{\pm}0.46\;mm$ of lateral incisor, and $5.93{\pm}0.47\;mm$ of canine. Buccal bony curvature angle below root apex was $134.7{\pm}17.5^{\circ}$ at central incisor, $151.0{\pm}13.9^{\circ}$ at lateral incisor, $153.0{\pm}9.5^{\circ}$ at canine. Distance between root apex and the deepest point of buccal bony curvature of central incisor was $3.67{\pm}1.28\;mm$ at central incisor, $3.90{\pm}1.51\;mm$ at lateral incisor, and $5.13{\pm}1.70\;mm$ at canine. CONCLUSION. Within the limitation of this study in Korean adults, the thickness of maxillary anterior buccal plate was very thin within 1mm and the thickness of palatal plate was thick, relatively. The buccal bony curvature below root apex of maxillary central incisor was higher than that of lateral incisor and canine and it seems that the buccal bony plate below root apex of central incisor is most curved.
Keywords
Cone-beam CT; Maxillary anterior teeth; Thickness of buccal alveolar bone; Buccal bony curvature;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Swasty D, Lee JS, Huang JC, Maki K, Gansky SA, Hatcher D, Miller AJ. Anthropometric analysis of the human mandibular cortical bone as assessed by cone-beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:491-500.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:43-61.
3 Nevins M, Camelo M, De Paoli S, Friedland B, Schenk RK, Parma-Benfenati S, Simion M, Tinti C, Wagenberg B. A study of the fate of the buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent roots. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:19-29.
4 Cardaropoli G, Arau′jo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2003;30:809-18.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Johnson K. A study of the dimensional changes occurring in the maxilla after tooth extraction. Part 2 : Closed face immediate denture treatment. Aust Dent J 1964;9:6-13.   DOI
6 London RM. The esthetic effects of implant platform selection. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001;22:675-82.
7 Garber DA, Salama MA, Salama H. Immediate total tooth replacement. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001;22:210-6, 218.
8 Saadoun AP, Le Gall MG. Periodontal implications in implant treatment planning for aesthetic results. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998;10:655-64.
9 Gelb DA. Immediate implant surgery: three-year retrospective evaluation of 50 consecutive cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:388-99.
10 Esposito M, Ekestubbe A, Grondahl K. Radiological evaluation of marginal bone loss at tooth surfaces facing single Branemark implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1993;4:151-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23:313-23.
12 Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K. Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: a surgical and prosthodontic rational. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 2000;12:817-24.
13 Smukler H, Castellucci F, Capri D. The role of the implant housing in obtaining aesthetics: generation of peri-implant gingivae and papillae-Part 1. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2003;15:141-9.
14 Langer B, Sullivan DY. Osseointegration: its impact on the interrelationship of periodontics and restorative dentistry. Part 3. Periodontal prosthesis redefined. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989;9:240-61.
15 Becker W, Sennerby L, Bedrossian E, Becker BE, Lucchini JP. Implant stability measurements for implants placed at the time of extraction: a cohort, prospective clinical trial. J Periodontol 2005;76:391-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Belser UC, Buser D, Hess D, Schmid B, Bernard JP, Lang NP. Aesthetic implant restorations in partially edentulous patientsa critical appraisal. Periodontol 2000 1998;17:132-50.
17 Buser D, von Arx T. Surgical procedures in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:83- 100.
18 $Ara\acute{u}jo$ MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:212-8.   DOI   ScienceOn