Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2022.60.2.143

Temperature change and performance of bur efficiency for two different drill combinations  

Hwang-Bo, Heung (Research Institute, CSM Implant)
Park, Jae-Young (Research Institute, CSM Implant)
Lee, Sang-Youn (Research Institute, CSM Implant)
Son, Keunbada (Advanced Dental Device Development Institute (A3DI), Kyungpook National University)
Lee, Kyu-Bok (Advanced Dental Device Development Institute (A3DI), Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.60, no.2, 2022 , pp. 143-151 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance efficiency of two different drill combinations according to the heat generated and drilling time. Materials and methods. In this study, cow ribs were used as research materials. To test the specimen, cow bones were rid of fascia and muscles, and a temperature sensor was mounted around the drilling area. The experimental group was divided into a group using a guide drill and a group using a Lindmann drill according to the drill used before the initial drilling. The drilling sequence of the guide drilling group is as follows; guide drill (ø 2.25), initial drill (ø 2.25), twist drill (ø 2.80), and twist drill (ø 3.20). The drilling sequence of the Lindmann drilling group is as follows; Lindmann drill (ø 2.10), initial drill (ø 2.25), twist drill (ø 2.80), and twist drill (ø 3.20). The temperature was measured after drilling. For statistical analysis, the difference between the groups was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and the Friedman test was used (α = .05). Results. The average performance efficiency for each specimen of guide drilling group ranged from 0.3861 to 1.1385 mm3/s and that of Lindmann drilling group ranged from 0.1700 to 0.4199 mm3/s. The two drill combinations contained a guide drill and Lindmann drill as their first drills. The combination using the guide drill demonstrated excellent performance efficiency when calculated using the drilling time (P < .001). Conclusion. Since the guide drill group showed better performance efficiency than the Lindmann drill group, the use of the guide drill was more suitable for the primary drilling process.
Keywords
Dental implants; Efficiency; Implant handpiece; Temperature change;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Scarano A, Lorusso F, Noumbissi S. Infrared thermographic evaluation of temperature modifications induced during implant site preparation with steel vs. zirconia implant drill. J Clin Med 2020;9:148.   DOI
2 Naito M, Lung K, Linke B. Retrospective analysis of the survival of dental implants placed by dental students: a 10-year chart review. J Can Dent Assoc 2020;86:k11.
3 Kniha K, Heussen N, Weber E, Mohlhenrich SC, Holzle F, Modabber A. Temperature threshold values of bone necrosis for thermo-explantation of dental implants-a systematic review on preclinical in vivo research. Materials (Basel) 2020;13:3461.   DOI
4 Kim SJ, Yoo J, Kim YS, Shin SW. Temperature change in pig rib bone during implant site preparation by low-speed drilling. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;18:522-7.   DOI
5 Alves SF, Wassall T. In vitro evaluation of osteoblastic cell adhesion on machined osseointegrated implants. Braz Oral Res 2009;23:131-6.   DOI
6 Misir AF, Sumer M, Yenisey M, Ergioglu E. Effect of surgical drill guide on heat generated from implant drilling. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:2663-8.   DOI
7 Cordioli G, Majzoub Z. Heat generation during implant site preparation: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:186-93.
8 Lamazza L, Lollobrigida M, Vozza I, Palmieri L, Stacchi C, Lombardi T, De Biase A. Piezoelectric implant site preparation: influence of handpiece movements on temperature elevation. Materials (Basel) 2020;13:4072.   DOI
9 Katic Z, Jukic T, Stubljar D. Effects of osteotomy lengths on the temperature rise of the crestal bone during implant site preparation. Implant Dent 2018;27:213-20.   DOI
10 Kirstein K, Dobrzynski M, Kosior P, Chroszcz A, Dudek K, Fita K, Parulska O, Rybak Z, Skalec A, Szklarz M, Janeczek M. Infrared thermographic assessment of cooling effectiveness in selected dental implant systems. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:1879468.
11 Chacon GE, Bower DL, Larsen PE, McGlumphy EA, Beck FM. Heat production by 3 implant drill systems after repeated drilling and sterilization. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:265-9.   DOI
12 Sharawy M, Misch CE, Weller N, Tehemar S. Heat generation during implant drilling: the significance of motor speed. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:1160-9.   DOI