Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2022.60.1.71

Implant overdenture using milled bar and attachment in partially edentulous mandible: a case report  

Kim, Min-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Huh, Jung-Bo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Jeong, Chang-Mo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Yun, Mi-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Lee, So-Hyoun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Jo, Yong-Bum (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.60, no.1, 2022 , pp. 71-79 More about this Journal
Abstract
Excessive crown height space increases can cause crestal bone loss and screw loosening after prosthesis is placed. Milled bar and implant overdenture can be used as a treatment method for partially edentulous patients who have severe alveolar bone loss and excessive crown height space. Milled bar can provide primary splinting effect and stability between implants. Also, milled bar with additional retention device such as Advanced Dental Device-Treatment Of Choice (ADD-TOC) and magnet can provide additional retention force for implant overdenture. In this case, the patient has a partially edentulous mandible that has severe alveolar bone loss and multiple number of teeth loss after excision due to leiomyosarcoma. Because of the long-term loss of mandibular molars, the opposing teeth were extruded. Maxillary left molars were corrected to the occlusal plane through molar intrusion, and mandibular left molar region were treated with implant overdenture, using milled bar with ADD-TOC and magnet after implant placement. The clinical result was satisfactory on the aspect of esthetic and masticatory function.
Keywords
Advanced Dental Device-Treatment Of Choice (ADD-TOC); Dental implant; Implant overdenture; Milled bar;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Zarb GA, MacKay HF. The partially edentulous patient. I. The biologic price of prosthodontic intervention. Aust Dent J 1980;25:63-8.   DOI
2 Sullivan DY. Prosthetic considerations for the utilization of osseointegrated fixtures in the partially edentulous arch. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:39-45.
3 Yeo DH, Lim JH, Cho IH. A study on the changes in retention of clips used to retain implant-supported overdenture. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1998;36: 566-80.
4 Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP. Treatment plan for restoring the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported restorations: removable overdenture versus fixed partial denture design. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:188-96.   DOI
5 Bulaqi HA, Mousavi Mashhadi M, Safari H, Samandari MM, Geramipanah F. Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:548-57.   DOI
6 Naert I, De Clercq M, Theuniers G, Schepers E. Overdentures supported by osseointegrated fixtures for the edentulous mandible: a 2.5-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:191-6.
7 Trakas T, Michalakis K, Kang K, Hirayama H. Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review. Implant Dent 2006;15:24-34.   DOI
8 Walton JN, MacEntee MI, Glick N. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:391-8.
9 DeBoer J. Edentulous implants: overdenture versus fixed. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:386-90.   DOI
10 Smith DE. Review of endosseous implants for partially edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:12-9.
11 Lee CK, Agar JR. Surgical and prosthetic planning for a two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:102-5.   DOI
12 Hwang JW, Shin SW. Magnetic overdenture. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1998;36:748-57.
13 van Kampen F, Cune M, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. Retention and postinsertion maintenance of barclip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:720-6.   DOI
14 Kim MS, Yoon MJ, Huh JB, Jeon YC, Jeong CM. Implant overdenture using a locator bar system by drill and tapping technique in a mandible edentulous patient: a case report. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4:116-20.   DOI
15 Choi JW, Chae SK, Huh JB. Comparison of the retentive characteristics of two additional attachment used with an implant bar attachment. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2021;59:173-80.   DOI
16 Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, van Steenberghe D. A 5-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in the mandibular overdenture therapy. Part I: Peri-implant outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:170-7.   DOI
17 Misch CE, Goodacre CJ, Finley JM, Misch CM, Marinbach M, Dabrowsky T, English CE, Kois JC, Cronin RJ Jr. Consensus conference panel report: crown-height space guidelines for implant dentistry-part 2. Implant Dent 2006;15:113-21.   DOI
18 Pasciuta M, Grossmann Y, Finger IM. A prosthetic solution to restoring the edentulous mandible with limited interarch space using an implant-tissue-supported overdenture: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:116-20.   DOI
19 Yang TC, Maeda Y, Gonda T, Kotecha S. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:1315-9.   DOI