Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2022.60.1.100

Complete mouth rehabilitation with fixed implant-supported prosthesis using temporary denture and dental CAD-CAM  

Jeon, Sol (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Yoon, Hyung-In (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Lee, Jae-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Yeo, In-Sung Luke (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Han, Jung-Suk (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.60, no.1, 2022 , pp. 100-109 More about this Journal
Abstract
Installation of dental implants at optimal angles and positions is critical in long-term stable implant-supported restorations. Surgery and prosthodontic procedures should be performed accurately as the treatment is planned. In this clinical case, Computer aided design and manufacturing technology was used not only to establish a precise surgical plan, but also to fabricate both provisional and definitive fixed prostheses. A surgical guide was designed to install the implants at proper positions for the definitive prostheses. The patient's esthetic information, which was necessary for the new provisional and definitive fixed prostheses, was obtained from the existing temporary dentures. Finally, the complete mouth fixed implant-supported rehabilitation using monolithic zirconia provided the patient with functionally and esthetically satisfactory prostheses.
Keywords
Implant-supported dental prostheses; Edentulous jaw; Computer-assisted surgery; Denture duplication;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Lemos CA, Ferro-Alves ML, Okamoto R, Mendonca MR, Pellizzer EP. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2016;47:8-17.   DOI
2 Misch CE. Dental implants prosthetics. 2nd ed., St. Louis; Elseiver; Mosby; 2015. p. 11.
3 Korsch M, Marten SM, Dotsch A, Jauregui R, Pieper DH, Obst U. Effect of dental cements on peri-implant microbial community: comparison of the microbial communities inhabiting the peri-implant tissue when using different luting cements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:e161-6.   DOI
4 Kanno T, Carlsson GE. A review of the shortened dental arch concept focusing on the work by the Kayser/Nijmegen group. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:850-62.   DOI
5 Joda T, Bragger U. Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:1430-5.   DOI
6 Kapos T, Ashy LM, Gallucci GO, Weber HP, Wismeijer D. Computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing in prosthetic implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:110-7.
7 Miyamoto T, Kumagai T, Jones JA, Van Dyke TE, Nunn ME. Compliance as a prognostic indicator: retrospective study of 505 patients treated and maintained for 15 years. J Periodontol 2006;77:223-32.   DOI
8 Lepidi L, Galli M, Grammatica A, Joda T, Wang HL, Li J. Indirect digital workflow for virtual cross-mounting of fixed implant-supported prostheses to create a 3d virtual patient. J Prosthodont 2021;30:177-82.   DOI
9 Jivraj S, Chee W, Corrado P. Treatment planning of the edentulous maxilla. Br Dent J 2006;201:261-79;quiz 304.   DOI
10 Hassan B, Gimenez Gonzalez B, Tahmaseb A, Greven M, Wismeijer D. A digital approach integrating facial scanning in a CAD-CAM workflow for complete-mouth implant-supported rehabilitation of patients with edentulism: A pilot clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:486-92.   DOI
11 Schulte W. Implants and the periodontium. Int Dent J 1995;45:16-26.
12 Zarone F, Apicella A, Nicolais L, Aversa R, Sorrentino R. Mandibular flexure and stress build-up in mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:103-14.   DOI
13 Wittneben JG, Buser D, Salvi GE, Burgin W, Hicklin S, Bragger U. Complication and failure rates with implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and single crowns: a 10-year retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16:356-64.   DOI
14 Harris BT, Chen L, Lin WS. Digital imaging and prosthetic-driven implant planning: efficient, accurate, and reliable treatment. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2017;38:492-4.
15 Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:26-35.   DOI
16 Wittneben JG, Millen C, Bragger U. Clinical performance of screw- versus cement-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions-a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:84-98.   DOI
17 Solow RA. Comprehensive implant restoration and the shortened dental arch. Gen Dent 2010;58:390-9.
18 Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP. Treatment plan for restoring the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported restorations: removable overdenture versus fixed partial denture design. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:188-96.   DOI
19 Kwon KR. The prosthetic approach for collapsed vertical dimensions of occlusion. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2004;20:169-81.
20 Annibali S, Cristalli MP, Dell'Aquila D, Bignozzi I, La Monaca G, Pilloni A. Short dental implants: a systematic review. J Dent Res 2012;91:25-32.   DOI