Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2021.59.4.405

Radiologic evaluation and survival rate of taper-straight designed implant with SLA surface: A 1-year follow-up retrospective study  

Kim, Jee Eun (School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Kim, Ye Seul (School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Kim, Ok-Su (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.59, no.4, 2021 , pp. 405-414 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose. This study was conducted to evaluate clinical usefulness by evaluating the marginal bone resorption and survival rate of an implant with a taper straight type SLA surface domestically available on the market recently. Materials and methods. 40 implants satisfying the including criteria were observed for one year of 125 implants of 83 adult men and women who had KISPLANT® implanted from August 2016 to December 2019 at the Department of Periodontology, Chonnam National University Dental Hospital. The marginal bone level was measured on periapical radiographs taken initially and 1 year later and we analyzed implant survival and success rates. A t-test was used for the analysis of the association between the marginal bone resorption and the severity of periodontitis, supportive periodontal therapy, the inserted site, the cause of extraction, immediate placement, and systemic disease. Results. After 1 year of loading, the mesial bone resorption was 0.74 ± 1.07 mm, and the distal bone resorption was 0.53 ± 1.04 mm. The marginal bone resorption of 2 mm or more occurred at 3 implants out of 40 implants after 1 year, so the success rate of implant was 92.5% and survival rate was 100%. There was a significant difference in mesial marginal bone resorption according to the inserted site and no significant differences were found between marginal bone resorption and the other factors. Conclusion. As a result of marginal bone resorption, success rate, and survival rate in this study, we found little marginal bone resorption and high survival and success rate. It can be concluded that they represent excellent clinical results.
Keywords
Implant; Marginal bone loss; SLA surface; Survival rate;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Penarrocha M, Palomar M, Sanchis JM, Guarinos J, Balaguer J. Radiologic study of marginal bone loss around 108 dental implants and its relationship to smoking, implant location, and morphology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:861-7.
2 Lee DH. An analysis of the growth and marketing strategies of osstemImplant. Ph.D Thesis, Department of Medical Device Management and Research, Sungkyunkwan University, 2019.
3 Kim MJ. A comparative study on the cumulative survival rate of the external hex implants: Neoplant® & 3i-Osseotite® and changes of the peri-implant marginal bone. Ph.D Thesis, Ewha Womans University, 2005.
4 O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:85-92.   DOI
5 Seong DJ, Hong SJ, Ha SR. External vs internal implant. J Korean Dent Assoc 2016;54:184-90.   DOI
6 Mei DM, Zhao B, Xu H, Wang Y. Radiographic and clinical outcomes of rooted, platform-switched, microthreaded implants with a sandblasted, largegrid, and acid-etched surface: A 5-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017;19:1074-81.   DOI
7 Norton MR, Astrom M. The influence of implant surface on maintenance of marginal bone levels for three premium implant brands: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2020;35:1099-111.   DOI
8 Nam KY. Two-year retrospective study on the clinical success of the Korean implant systems. Ph.D Thesis, Kangneung National University, 2003.
9 Im SS. A study on the Utilization of National Health Insurance Care Benefit for the elderly denture and dental implants. Ph.D Thesis, Graduate School of Konyang University, 2020.
10 Song MJ. Retrospective study on survival and marginal bone loss of short implants: clinical results after 2-4 years. Ph.D Thesis, Dankook University, 2016.
11 An HS. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of Neoplant implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface and external connection. Ph.D Thesis, Graduate School, Yonsei University, 2007.
12 Wyatt CC, Zarb GA. Treatment outcomes of patients with implant-supported fixed partial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:204-11.
13 Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:1-11.   DOI
14 Goiato MC, Pellizzer EP, da Silva EV, Bonatto Lda R, dos Santos DM. Is the internal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? A systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;19:229-42.   DOI
15 Ten Bruggenkate CM, van der Kwast WA, Oosterbeek HS. Success criteria in oral implantology. A review of the literature. Int J Oral Implantol 1990;7:45-51.
16 Fourmousis I, Bragger U. Radiologic interpretation of peri-implant structures. Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Periodontology: Implant Dentistry 1999;3:228-41.
17 Yoo JH. Effect of initial placement level and wall thickness on maintenance of the marginal bone level in implants with a conical implant-abutment interface. Ph.D Thesis, Graduate School, Yonsei University, 2020.
18 Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
19 Tada S, Stegaroiu R, Kitamura E, Miyakawa O, Kusakari H. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:357-68.
20 Hwang JM, Kim YK. Retrospective study of implantium® dental implants : clinical and radiographic results of 22 months. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;9:30-40.
21 Zitzmann NU, Scharer P, Marinello CP. Long-term results of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: a 5-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:355-66.