Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2021.59.1.146

Accuracy of conventional and digital mounting of dental models: A literature review  

Kim, Cheolmin (Department of Prosthodontics, Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, School of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Ji, Woon (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Chang, Jaeseung (Department of Prosthodontics, Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, School of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Kim, Sunjai (Department of Prosthodontics, Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, School of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.59, no.1, 2021 , pp. 146-152 More about this Journal
Abstract
Accurate transfer of the maxillo-mandibular relationship to an articulator (i.e., mounting) is critical in prosthetic treatment procedures. In the current study, a PubMed search was performed to review the influencing factors for the maxillo-mandibular relationship's accuracy. The search included digital mounting as well as conventional gypsum cast mounting. The results showed that a greater amount of displacement was introduced during positioning the maxillary and mandibular models to interocclusal records rather than the dimensional change of registration material. Most intraoral scanners resulted in an accurate reproduction of the maxillo-mandibular relationship for posterior quadrant scanning; however, the accuracy was declined as the scan area increased to a complete arch scan. The digital mounting accuracy was also influenced by the image processing algorithms and software versions, especially for complete arch scans.
Keywords
Accuracy; Dental models; Mounting; Virtual mounting;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Millstein PL, Hsu CC. Differential accuracy of elastomeric recording materials and associated weight change. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:400-3.   DOI
2 Gregory WA, Kaplan MD. A comparison of the accuracy of two articulating methods: the double-arch impression technique vs. hand-articulated full-arch casts. Quintessence Int 1988;19:631-4.
3 Edher F, Hannam AG, Tobias DL, Wyatt CCL. The accuracy of virtual interocclusal registration during intraoral scanning. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:904-12.   DOI
4 DeLong R, Knorr S, Anderson GC, Hodges J, Pintado MR. Accuracy of contacts calculated from 3D images of occlusal surfaces. J Dent 2007;35:528-34.   DOI
5 Tanaka Y, Hattori Y. Dimensional and occlusal accuracy of a novel three-dimensional digital model of articulated dental arches. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:282-7.   DOI
6 Iwaki Y, Wakabayashi N, Igarashi Y. Dimensional accuracy of optical bite registration in single and multiple unit restorations. Oper Dent 2013;38:309-15.   DOI
7 Yee SHX, Esguerra RJ, Chew AAQ, Wong KM, Tan KBC. Three-dimensional static articulation accuracy of virtual models-Part II: Effect of model scanner-CAD systems and articulation method. J Prosthodont 2018;27:137-44.   DOI
8 Zimmermann M, Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. Accuracy of buccal scan procedures for the registration of habitual intercuspation. Oper Dent 2018;43:573-80.   DOI
9 Ren S, Morton D, Lin WS. Accuracy of virtual interocclusal records for partially edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:860-5.   DOI
10 Solaberrieta E, Garmendia A, Brizuela A, Otegi JR, Pradies G, Szentpetery A. Intraoral digital impressions for virtual occlusal records: Section quantity and dimensions. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:7173824.
11 Campos AA, Nathanson D. Compressibility of two polyvinyl siloxane interocclusal record materials and its effect on mounted cast relationships. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:456-61.   DOI
12 Assif D, Himel R, Grajower Y. A new electromechanical device to measure the accuracy of interocclusal records. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:672-6.   DOI
13 Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Kinderknecht KE. Accuracy of three interocclusal recording materials used to mount a working cast. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:265-70.   DOI
14 Ghazal M, Ludwig K, Habil RN, Kern M. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal recording materials. Quintessence Int 2008;39:727-32.
15 Solaberrieta E, Otegi JR, Goicoechea N, Brizuela A, Pradies G. Comparison of a conventional and virtual occlusal record. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:92-7.   DOI
16 Michalakis KX, Pissiotis A, Anastasiadou V, Kapari D. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part I: consistency prior to setting. J Prosthodont 2004;13:42-6.   DOI
17 Ghazal M, Albashaireh ZS, Kern M. The ability of different materials to reproduce accurate records of interocclusal relationships in the vertical dimension. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:816-20.   DOI
18 Ghazal M, Hedderich J, Kern M. An in vitro study of condylar displacement caused by interocclusal records: Influence of recording material, storage time, and recording technique. J Prosthodont 2017;26:587-93.   DOI
19 Peregrina A, Reisbick MH. Occlusal accuracy of casts made and articulated differently. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:422-5.   DOI
20 Strohaver RA. A comparison of articulator mountings made with centric relation and myocentric position records. J Prosthet Dent 1972;28:379-90.   DOI
21 Park JM, Jeon J, Heo SJ. Accuracy comparison of buccal bite scans by five intra-oral scanners. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2018;34:17-31.   DOI
22 Arslan Y, Bankoglu Gungor M, Karakoca Nemli S, Kokdogan Boyaci B, Aydin C. Comparison of maximum intercuspal contacts of articulated casts and virtual casts requiring posterior fixed partial dentures. J Prosthodont 2017;26:594-8.   DOI
23 Wong KY, Esguerra RJ, Chia VAP, Tan YH, Tan KBC. Three-dimensional accuracy of digital static interocclusal registration by three intraoral scanner systems. J Prosthodont 2018;27:120-8.   DOI
24 Gintaute A, Keeling AJ, Osnes CA, Zitzmann NU, Ferrari M, Joda T. Precision of maxillo-mandibular registration with intraoral scanners in vitro. J Prosthodont Res 2020;64:114-9.   DOI
25 Prasad BR, Mehra D. Interocclusal records in prosthodontic rehabilitations-Materals and techniques-A literature review. Nitte Univ J Health Sci 2012;2:54-60
26 Fattore L, Malone WF, Sandrik JL, Mazur B, Hart T. Clinical evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:152-7.   DOI
27 Walls AW, Wassell RW, Steele JG. A comparison of two methods for locating the intercuspal position (ICP) whilst mounting casts on an articulator. J Oral Rehabil 1991;18:43-8.   DOI
28 Wieckiewicz M, Grychowska N, Zietek M, Wieckiewicz W. Evaluation of the elastic properties of thirteen silicone interocclusal recording materials. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:7456046.
29 Vergos VK, Tripodakis AP. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal records. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:365-8.
30 Ury E, Fornai C, Weber GW. Accuracy of transferring analog dental casts to a virtual articulator. J Prosthet dent 2020;123:305-13.   DOI
31 Sfondrini MF, Gandini P, Malfatto M, Di Corato F, Trovati F, Scribante A. Computerized casts for orthodontic purpose using powder-free intraoral scanners: Accuracy, execution time, and patient feedback. Biomed Res Int 2018;4103232.
32 Ender A, Zimmermann M, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Int J Comput Dent 2019;22:11-9.
33 Chang YB, Xia JJ, Gateno J, Xiong Z, Teichgraeber JF, Lasky RE, Zhou X. In vitro evaluation of new approach to digital dental model articulation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:952-62.   DOI
34 Chun JH, Pae A, Kim SH. Polymerization shrinkage strain of interocclusal recording materials. Dent Mater 2009;25:115-20.   DOI
35 Krahenbuhl JT, Cho SH, Irelan J, Bansal NK. Accuracy and precision of occlusal contacts of stereolithographic casts mounted by digital interocclusal registrations. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:231-6.   DOI
36 Xia JJ, Chang YB, Gateno J, Xiong Z, Zho X. Automated digital dental articulation. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2010;13:278-86.
37 Porter JL, Carrico CK, Lindauer SJ, Tufekci E. Comparison of intraoral and extraoral scanners on the accuracy of digital model articulation. J Orthod 2018;45:275-82.   DOI
38 Millstein PL, Kronman JH, Clark RE. Determination of the accuracy of wax interocclusal registrations. J Prosthet Dent 1971;25:189-96.   DOI
39 Muller HC. Registration of occlusion by buccal scan in Cerec software version 3.80. Int J Comput Dent 2010;13:265-73.