Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2021.59.1.11

Comparative analysis of distance measurement on the rendering screen between dental CAD programs  

Cha, Cheol-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, Veterans Health Service Medical Center)
Lim, Seon-Young (Department of Prosthodontics, Veterans Health Service Medical Center)
Bang, Ju-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics, Veterans Health Service Medical Center)
Kim, Seong-Ah (Department of Prosthodontics, Veterans Health Service Medical Center)
Kim, Seong-Yong (Department of Prosthodontics, Veterans Health Service Medical Center)
Lee, Yong-Sang (Department of Prosthodontics, Veterans Health Service Medical Center)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.59, no.1, 2021 , pp. 11-17 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study was to find out whether the rendering screen difference affect to measuring distance in a CAD program according to three types of CAD programs. Materials and methods: The model presented in ISO 12836 for dental scanner evaluation was reduced by 70%. This model was repeatedly scanned 15 times using Trios II (3Shape, Denmark). Using the output STL file, 3Shape CAD, inLab 15, and ExoCAD programs were used to measure the horizontal distance (H) and vertical distance (V) between adjacent point angle, and for each experiment, three groups were set according to the CAD program type. Statistical analysis was performed using One-way ANOVA test and post hoc was performed using Dunnett T3 test. Results: In the horizontal and vertical distance measurement, there was no difference in the average of the measured values between the three groups according to the CAD program (P>.05). Conclusion: There were no effect of the difference in the rendering screen in the horizontal and vertical linear distance measurements of the inlay model on the dental CAD program.
Keywords
Computer-aided design; Computer-aided manufacturing; Marginal adaptation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, Kilpela A, Makynen A. Recent advances in dental optics - Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Opt Laser Eng 2014;54:203-21.   DOI
2 Ueda Y, Yamaguchi TJ. History of and current situation regarding dental CAD/CAM systems and future perspectives. Hokkaido J Dent Sci 2017;38:104-10.
3 Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-11.   DOI
4 Alghazzawi TF. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: Options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res 2016;60:72-84.   DOI
5 van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12.   DOI
6 Juh JB, Shim JS. The factors caused errors in the production process of CAD/CAM prosthesis based on experience. J Korean Dent Assoc 2014;52:332-45.   DOI
7 Uhm SH, Kim JH, Jiang HB, Woo CW, Chang M, Kim KN, Bae JM, Oh S. Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of four intraoral scanners with 70% reduced inlay and four-unit bridge models of international standard. Dent Mater J 2017;36:27-34.   DOI
8 Chon JH, Yang HI. Triangular mesh generation algorithm for generating nodes and triangular elements concurrently. Korean J Comput Des Eng 2000;5:207-14.
9 Berger M, Tagliasacchi A, Seversky LM, Alliez P, Levine J, Sharf A, Silva CT. State of the art in surface reconstruction from point clouds. Eurographics 2014:161-85.
10 Chae MJ, Lee GW, Kim JR, Park JW, Yoo HS, Cho MY. Development of the 3D imaging system and automatic registration algorithm for the intelligent excavation system (IES). Korean J Constr Eng Manag 2009;10:136-45.
11 Kwon SW. Object recognition and modeling technology using laser scanning and BIM for construction industry. J Architect Institut Korea 2009;53:31-8.
12 Lee YS. Comparative study of accuracy in dental CAD softwares on designing a fixed partial denture. Graduate school, Yonsei university 2019.