Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2020.58.4.356

SB-locking method for keeping implant restorations mechanically in place using fiber post: A case report  

Chung, Min Ah (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
Leesungbok, Richard (Department of Biomaterials & Prosthodontics, Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital at Gangdong)
Lee, Suk Won (Department of Biomaterials & Prosthodontics, Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital at Gangdong)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.58, no.4, 2020 , pp. 356-362 More about this Journal
Abstract
All the faculties at the prosthodontic department in Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital at Gangdong, have been implementing the Top-Down concept of treatment approach since 2006 in which the outcomes of the last prosthetic treatment are predicted in advance during the treatment planning stage of patients with dental tissue defects. Based on the Top-Down concept, this report is also an example of how the final prosthetic treatment was performed in advance before going into implant surgery for the missing teeth. Among the various methods of connecting implant fixture and restoration, the cement-retained method is relatively simple to manufacture restoration without being constrained by the angle of the implants placed, but difficult to remove remaining subgingival excess cement completely, and to detach it being when necessary. In the report, SB-locking method will be introduced which enables an aesthetic implant restoration without either a screw hole or residual excess cement.
Keywords
Cement-retained; Fiber-post; Retrievability; SB-locking; Screw-retained; Top-Down;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Park YH. Reliability of percussion-type measurements on implant primary stability according to the height of healing abutments. Master's thesis, Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, 2018 Aug. 28p.
2 Benic GI, Mir-Mari J, Hammerle CHF. Loading protocols for single-implant crowns: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:222-38.   DOI
3 Hinds KF. Custom impression coping for an exact registration of the healed tissue in the esthetic implant restoration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17:584-91.
4 Chung, C. and Son, M. The classification and comparison of implant prosthesis according to types of retention. Part II: screw-cement retained prosthesis. J Korean Acad Oral Maxillofac Implantol 2011;15:58-70.
5 Arman A, Viram U, Surbhi M, Itanshu G. Techniques for retrievability of cement retained implant prosthesis. J Dent Implants 2014;4:161-4.   DOI
6 Valbao FP Jr, Perez EG, Breda M. Alternative method for retention and removal of cement-retained implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:181-3.   DOI
7 Chee WW, Torbati A, Albouy JP. Retrievable cemented implant restorations. J Prosthodont 1998;7:120-5.   DOI
8 Yoon NR, Richard Leesungbok, Lee SW, Ahn SJ, Park SJ. A new retaining method of cement-retained restoration with linguo-horizontal insertion of fiber post. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2017;55:71-8.   DOI
9 Park YH, Richard Leesungbok, Lee SW, Paek JH, Lee JY. Differences in percussion-type measurements of implant stability according to height of healing abutments and measurement angle. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2018;56:278-86.   DOI
10 Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 3rd ed. St. Louis; CV Mosby; 2007. p. 737-51.
11 Leesungbok R. Dr. Lee's Top-Down implant dentistry. Seoul; Myoung Mun Publishing Co.; 2004.
12 Morton D, Chen ST, Martin WC, Levine RA, Buser D. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding optimizing esthetic outcomes in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:216-20.
13 Misch CE. Screw-retained versus cement-retained implantsupported prostheses. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;7:15-8.
14 Ma S, Fenton A. Screw- versus cement-retained implant prostheses: a systematic review of prosthodontic maintenance and complications. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:127-45.   DOI
15 Lee A, Okayasu K, Wang HL. Screw- versus cementretained implant restorations: current concepts. Implant Dent 2010;19:8-15.   DOI
16 Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35.   DOI
17 Wilson TG Jr. The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study. J Periodontol 2009;80:1388-92.   DOI
18 Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Vindasiute E, Linkeviciene L, Apse P. Does residual cement around implant-supported restorations cause peri-implant disease? A retrospective case analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:1179-84.   DOI