Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2020.58.4.313

Effect of machining precision of single ceramic restorations on the marginal and internal fit  

Son, Keunbada (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University)
Yu, Beom-Young (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University)
Lee, Kyu-Bok (Advanced Dental Device Development Institute (A3DI), Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.58, no.4, 2020 , pp. 313-320 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the machining precision and the marginal and internal fit of single restorations fabricated with three types of lithium disilicate ceramic blocks and to evaluate the correlation. Materials and methods: Single restorations were designed using a CAD software program. The crown designed model file was extracted from the CAD software program. Three types of lithium disilicate blocks (Rosetta; HASS, IPS e.max CAD; Ivoclar vivadent, VITA Suprinity; VITA) were milled using a milling machine. For the fabrication of the crown scanned model file, the intaglio surface of the restoration was digitized using a contact scanner. Then, using the three-dimensional inspection software (Geomagic control X; 3D Systems), the process of the overlap of the crown designed model and the scanned model and 3-dimensional analysis was conducted. In addition, the marginal and internal fit of the crowns was evaluated by a silicone replication method. The difference among three types of single ceramic crown was analyzed using a Kruskal-Wallis H test, and Spearman correlation analysis was performed to analyze the correlation between machining precision and fitness (α=.05). Results: There was a significant difference in the machining precision and the marginal and internal fit according to the type of ceramic block (P<.001). In addition, the machining precision and the marginal and internal fit were positively correlated (P<.001). Conclusion: The marginal fit of crowns fabricated according to the types of ceramic blocks was within the clinically acceptable range (< 120 ㎛), so it can be regarded as appropriate machining precision applicable to all clinical as aspects in terms of the marginal fit.
Keywords
Ceramic; Machining precision; Marginal and internal fit; Single restoration;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Park GH, Son K, Lee KB. Feasibility of using an intraoral scanner for a complete-arch digital scan. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:803-10.   DOI
2 Park JM, Kim RJ, Lee KW. Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:113-20.   DOI
3 Braian M, Wennerberg A. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate completearch mandibular casts: A comparative in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2019;122:129-36.   DOI
4 Jang D, Son K, Lee KB. A comparative study of the fitness and trueness of a three-unit fixed dental prosthesis fabricated using two digital workflows. Appl Sci 2019;9:1-12.
5 Lee JJ, Son K, Bae EB, Choi JW, Lee KB, Huh JB. Comparison of the trueness of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated from all-in-one and combination CAD/CAM systems. Int J Prosthodont 2019;32:352-4.   DOI
6 Araujo NS, Moda MD, Silva EA, Zavanelli AC, Mazaro JV, Pellizzer EP. Survival of all-ceramic restorations after a minimum follow-up of five years: A systematic review. Quintessence Int 2016;47:395-405.
7 Bosch G, Ender A, Mehl A. A 3-dimensional accuracy analysis of chairside CAD/CAM milling processes. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1425-31.   DOI
8 Choi YK, Banerjee A. Tool path generation and tolerance analysis for free-form surfaces. Int J Mach Tool Manu 2007;47:689-96.   DOI
9 Kirsch C, Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. Trueness of four different milling procedures used in dental CAD/CAM systems. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:551-8.   DOI
10 Martinez S, Cuesta E, Barreiro J, Alvarez B. Analysis of laser scanning and strategies for dimensional and geometrical control. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 2010;46:621-9   DOI
11 Wang W, Yu H, Liu Y, Jiang X, Gao B. Trueness analysis of zirconia crowns fabricated with 3-dimensional printing. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:285-91.   DOI
12 Son K, Yu BY, Yoon TH, Lee KB. Comparative study of the trueness of the inner surface of crowns fabricated from three types of lithium disilicate blocks. Appl Sci 2019;9:1798.   DOI
13 Papadiochou S, Pissiotis AL. Marginal adaptation and CADCAM technology: A systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:545-51.   DOI
14 Son K, Lee WS, Lee KB. Prediction of the learning curves of 2 dental CAD software programs. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:95-100.   DOI
15 de Paula Silveira AC, Chaves SB, Hilgert LA, Ribeiro AP. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:386-92.   DOI
16 Renne W, Wolf B, Kessler R, McPherson K, Mennito AS. Evaluation of the marginal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated using two different chairside CAD/CAM systems on preparations of varying quality. J Esthet Restor Dent 2015;27:194-202.   DOI
17 Son K, Lee S, Kang SH, Park J, Lee KB, Jeon M, Yun BJ. A comparison study of marginal and internal fit assessment methods for fixed dental prostheses. J Clin Med 2019;8:785.   DOI
18 Dolev E, Bitterman Y, Meirowitz A. Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:124-8.   DOI
19 Lee DH. Digital approach to assessing the 3-dimensional misfit of fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:836-9.   DOI
20 Son K, Lee KB. Prediction of learning curves of 2 dental CAD software programs, part 2: Differences in learning effects by type of dental personnel. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:747-52.   DOI
21 Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM. Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Dent Mater 2016;32:908-14.   DOI
22 Dancey C, Reidy J. Statistics without maths for psychology. Pearson Higher Ed; 2014. p. 124-56.
23 Colombo M, Poggio C, Lasagna A, Chiesa M, Scribante A. Vickers micro-hardness of new restorative CAD/CAM dental materials: evaluation and comparison after exposure to acidic drink. Materials (Basel) 2019;12:1246.   DOI
24 Kim CM, Kim SR, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Trueness of milled prostheses according to number of ball-end mill burs. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:624-9.   DOI
25 Song XF, Ren HT, Yin L. Machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016;53:78-92.   DOI
26 Bohez EL. Compensating for systematic errors in 5-axis NC machining. Comput Aided Des 2002;34:391-403.   DOI