Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2020.58.4.306

Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level alteration around narrow implants placed in narrow alveolar ridge using guided flapless surgery  

Jeong, Seung-Mi (Department of Prosthodontics, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University)
Choi, Byung-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.58, no.4, 2020 , pp. 306-312 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare radiographic outcomes around narrow-diameter implants placed using guided flapless surgery at longer than 6 month post-placement. Materials and methods: A total of 12 implants were assessed in 12 patients for the sites where 0.5 - 1.5 mm labial bone was covering the implants, using CBCT. Results: A statistically significant preservation of crestal bone was observed in the narrow-diameter implants. Conclusion: Guided flapless implant surgery may be important in preventing bone loss around the narrow-diameter implants that are placed in narrow alveolar ridges.
Keywords
Computer-guided; Cemented abutment; Custom abutment; Flapless surgery; Narrow implant;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Spray JR, Black CG, Morris HF, Ochi S. The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Ann Periodontol 2000;5:119-28.   DOI
2 Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D boneto-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005;25:113-9.
3 Vercruyssen M, Laleman I, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Computer-supported implant planning and guided surgery: a narrative review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:69-76.
4 D'haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, Hultin M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy and complications using computerdesigned stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:321-35.   DOI
5 Cassetta M, Stefanelli LV, Giansanti M, Calasso S. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical template. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:655-63.
6 Oh JH, An X, Jeong SM, Choi BH. Digital workflow for computer-guided implant surgery in edentulous patients: A case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75:2541-9.   DOI
7 Fang Y, An X, Jeong SM, Choi BH. Accuracy of computerguided implant placement in anterior regions. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:836-42.   DOI
8 Jeong SM, Choi BH, Li J, Kim HS, Ko CY, Jung JH, Lee HJ, Lee SH, Engelke W. Flapless implant surgery: an experimental study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:24-8.   DOI
9 Santosa RE. Provisional restoration options in implant dentistry. Aust Dent J 2007;52:234-42; quiz 254.   DOI
10 Belser UC, Bernard JP, Buser D. Implant-supported restorations in the anterior region: prosthetic considerations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1996;8:875-83; quiz 884.
11 Oh JH, Fang Y, Jeong SM, Choi BH. The effect of low-speed drilling without irrigation on heat generation: an experimental study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;42:9-12.   DOI
12 Silverstein LH, Kurtzman D, Garnick JJ, Trager PS, Waters PK. Connective tissue grafting for improved implant esthetics: clinical technique. Implant Dent 1994;3:231-4.   DOI
13 Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry, 3rd ed., St Louis: Mosby, 2008, p. 678-9.
14 Campelo LD, Camara JR. Flapless implant surgery: a 10-year clinical retrospective analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:271-6.
15 Becker W, Goldstein M, Becker BE, Sennerby L. Minimally invasive flapless implant surgery: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7:S21-7.
16 Becker W, Wikesjo UM, Sennerby L, Qahash M, Hujoel P, Goldstein M, Turkyilmaz I. Histologic evaluation of implants following flapless and flapped surgery: a study in canines. J Periodontol 2006;77:1717-22.   DOI