Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2020.58.3.239

Burnishing effect on marginal misfit of implant-supported screw-and-cement retained prostheses: A case report  

Kim, Mijoo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Lee, Du-Hyeong (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.58, no.3, 2020 , pp. 239-243 More about this Journal
Abstract
When the marginal fit of fixed dental prosthesis decreases, biological and technical complications, such as plaque accumulation, periodontal disease, hypersensitivity, components fracture, cement loss, can happen. The complications affect the long-term success and survival of prostheses. This case report describes a clinical procedure to minimize the marginal gap of implant-supported screw-and-cement retained prosthesis by removing prosthesis-abutment complex and burnishing the interface area. The marginal gap was measured before and after the burnishing using a stereomicroscope and compared. This technique improves the marginal fit, thereby contributing the longevity of the prosthesis.
Keywords
Burnishing; Implant; Marginal fit; Screw-and-cement retained prosthesis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Chee W, Felton DA, Johnson PF, Sullivan DY. Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: which is better? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:137-41.
2 Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35.   DOI
3 Taylor TD. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:74-8.   DOI
4 Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:185-94.   DOI
5 Goodacre CJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:537-52.   DOI
6 Pauletto N, Lahiffe BJ, Walton JN. Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:865-8.
7 Goiato MC, dos Santos DM, Santiago JF Jr, Moreno A, Pellizzer EP. Longevity of dental implants in type IV bone: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;43:1108-16.   DOI
8 Sundar MK, Chikmagalur SB, Pasha F. Marginal fit and microleakage of cast and metal laser sintered copings-an in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res 2014;58:252-8.   DOI
9 Aparicio C. A new method for achieving passive fit of an interim restoration supported by Branemark implants: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:614-8.
10 Preiskel HW, Tsolka P. The DIA anatomic abutment system and telescopic prostheses: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:628-33.
11 Misch CE. Screw-retained versus cement-retained implantsupported prostheses. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1995;7:15-8.
12 Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G. Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns--validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:116-22.   DOI
13 Chen CJ, Papaspyridakos P, Guze K, Singh M, Weber HP, Gallucci GO. Effect of misfit of cement-retained implant single crowns on crestal bone changes. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:135-7.   DOI
14 Knoernschild KL, Campbell SD. Periodontal tissue responses after insertion of artificial crowns and fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:492-8.   DOI
15 Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Craig's restorative dental materials. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2012. p. 37-9.
16 Nawafleh NA, Mack F, Evans J, Mackay J, Hatamleh MM. Accuracy and reliability of methods to measure marginal adaptation of crowns and FDPs: a literature review. J Prosthodont 2013;22:419-28.   DOI
17 Rastogi A, Kamble V. Comparative analysis of the clinical techniques used in evaluation of marginal accuracy of cast restoration using stereomicroscopy as gold standard. J Adv Prosthodont 2011;3:69-75.   DOI